So do you think we can prevent the war of Armageddon or are you wiling to start it?We should purge evil by any means necessary. With love or bullets: I’m good with both.
So do you think we can prevent the war of Armageddon or are you wiling to start it?We should purge evil by any means necessary. With love or bullets: I’m good with both.
==================================does the church have a duty/mandate to impose a veneer of outward righteousness on an unregenerate, unbelieving world through legislated ethical behaviour?
is it the appointed task of Christendom to take hold of governmental & legislative power and in so doing force the lost to act like they're not wicked?
would appreciate examples / justification from scripture and discussion of the theological underpinnings of your views; thanks!
Armageddon can not be prevented. As far as starting it, I doubt it’s my calling in life, but if it’s God’s will that I do then so be it.So do you think we can prevent the war of Armageddon or are you wiling to start it?
There is nothing political about recognizing fraud. It is a criminal matter regardless of politics. And Paul said that in the last days "evildoers and seducers" would increase exponentially. But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived. (2 Tim 3:13)so i'm curious whether there are Biblical reasons for you to believe the 'massive fraud' story, or if it's purely political on your part.
So is the church obligated to seek governmental authority to prohibit it in the greater society, not just among those who name the name of Christ, but among the heathen?
This isn't the same question as voting ones conscience in a free democratic nation.
Explain the difference?
Always remember judgement starts in the house of the Lord.
Was it Israel's job to police the Egyptians tho? Were they supposed to take over Babylon and force the pagans to keep sabbaths and feasts and wear tzitzit? Or were there laws for them and 'the foreigner dwelling among them'?
Daniel didn't ask that no one eat meat, only that he and his fellow israelites be allowed not to - and Paul didn't try to get a seat in the Roman Senate to change their laws.
Was it Israel's job to police the Egyptians tho? Were they supposed to take over Babylon and force the pagans to keep sabbaths and feasts and wear tzitzit? Or were there laws for them and 'the foreigner dwelling among them'?
Daniel didn't ask that no one eat meat, only that he and his fellow israelites be allowed not to - and Paul didn't try to get a seat in the Roman Senate to change their laws.
Totally missed the point. Israel was given a land we are sent into all the world.
Teach us to pray Lord......thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
Did not God send moses to pharaoh to say what God wanted.
Was not Daniel and his 3 friends a testamony of God fearing people refusing to obey that which was not of God.
Your argument here will fall apart over and over again.
What God has joined together let no man put asunder.
Sorry I didn't end up with much free time after work yesterday..
I could put it this way:
We have in this country an opportunity to make our voices heard and our opinions counted about what becom s law. We should take that opportunity, for sure.
But what I'm asking about is, suppose the votes are counted or the representative is elected and the outcome is that something contrary to our wishes is enacted or someone we disagree with is given power and authority, according to the will of the republic. That our opinion turns out to be minority.
Given that we have an ethos informed by scripture, does the gospel then compel us to overturn the authority of the elected officials and impose our will on the secular nation regardess of - in fact despite - the expressed will of the people being contrary to ours?
Suppose for example we are convinced covetousness is sinful. The laws allow Walmart to advertise and sell baubles. Does the gospel obligate us to go on a bauble-clasm, shut down Walmart and forcibly remove any political power in our way, setting up loyalists to our cause by whatever means necessary, to make sure that no one, whether un the church or out of it can access baubles or be tempted by them?
Do we spank our neighbors kids.
But what I'm asking about is, suppose the votes are counted or the representative is elected and the outcome is that something contrary to our wishes is enacted or someone we disagree with is given power and authority, according to the will of the republic. That our opinion turns out to be minority.
Given that we have an ethos informed by scripture, does the gospel then compel us to overturn the authority of the elected officials and impose our will on the secular nation regardess of - in fact despite - the expressed will of the people being contrary to ours?
If the election turns out to be not a sham then in a Democratic Constitutional Republic the minority groups have equal rights. They have the ability by law to vote and lobby for their beliefs. I see nothing in scripture to say we shouldn't vote. But I see how we should vote related to morality.
If the contrary will of the people is to start a socialist party like NAZI and then determine certain minority groups are not worthy of life it is not only of moral duty but by the sanctity of life we defend ourselves and the innocence of others.
When the blood of the innocent cries out to the Lord and the Lord looks as the supposed moral upright of mankind choose to turn a blind eye while the wicked of evil loosen the toxicity of their ideologies upon the world. The Lord God will judge me on my conscience as He has told in His Word what is moral, what is good, and what is evil.
Proverbs 24:11-12
11 Rescue those who are being taken away to death;
hold back those who are stumbling to the slaughter.
12 If you say, “Behold, we did not know this,”
does not he who weighs the heart perceive it?
Does not he who keeps watch over your soul know it,
and will he not repay man according to his work?
If the contrary will of the people is to start a socialist party like NAZI and then determine certain minority groups are not worthy of life it is not only of moral duty but by the sanctity of life we defend ourselves and the innocence of others.
We should purge evil by any means necessary. With love or bullets: I’m good with both.
Armageddon can not be prevented. As far as starting it, I doubt it’s my calling in life, but if it’s God’s will that I do then so be it.
Then it’s not my calling.to my understanding 'starting it' amounts to joining with a coalition of nations led by the antichrist to invade Israel & seize something from them.![]()
to my understanding 'starting it' amounts to joining with a coalition of nations led by the antichrist to invade Israel & seize something from them.Duskey said:
Armageddon can not be prevented. As far as starting it, I doubt it’s my calling in life, but if it’s God’s will that I do then so be it.![]()
In Romans 13 what kind of government does Paul speak of? Good or bad government?i have to be able to explain why Paul, prisoner of Nero Ceaser, wrote Romans 13 - saying be subject to earthly authority because it is appointed by God. why he did not say, seize control of or otherwise overthrow the Roman government because their civil precepts & culture favor immorality.