That is God's prerogative. Who are you to question God?If God has all power, and he does, why would he let man reject him.
That is God's prerogative. Who are you to question God?If God has all power, and he does, why would he let man reject him.
I would like to restate my question and ask, How can man reject God in his desire to save him eternally when man has nothing to do with choosing eternal salvation? We are saved eternally by God's grace and that not of ourselves lest any man should boast. Are you boasting? The only ones that can suppress the truth are the ones that have the imputed righteousness of Christ, in which, the natural man does not have. I do believe that Jesus's sacrifice was sufficient in that he saved all that he died for without the loss of even one. You are affirming that his sacrifice was not sufficient in that you say he died for all mankind and could not save all of them. You do not correctly divide the different salvation scriptures and you do not correctly divide the whole elect world from the whole world of its inhabitants.As revealed in Rom 1:18, man suppresses the truth in unrighteousness.
Adam and Eve rejected the truth in unrighteousness;
Cain rejected the truth in unrighteousness; etc. etc.
Abel did not suppress the truth in unrighteousness; Seth did not suppress the truth in unrighteousness; Noah did not suppress the truth in unrighteousness; etc. etc.
You limit the power of God. You do not believe the sacrifice of His Son was sufficient. However, Scripture tells us He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:2).
Before.ForestGreenCook,
re: "I thought I answered your question. You ask 'Does he have that knowledge before he created man?' And my answer was 'He has All foreknowledge'"
I didn't know if that meant the He has all foreknowledge before He creates a person or if it is only after He creates the person.
And BTW, you misquoted me.
That is a good question. I don't know. I have a lot of questions as to why God does and does not do many things. Rom 11:33, O the depths of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!ForestGreenCook,
re: "Before."
OK, thanks. So if the supreme being knows before He creates a person that He will eventually be tossing the person into the lake of fire, why do you suppose He goes ahead and creates the person anyway?
I have stated before and I will state again: The sacrifice of Jesus was sufficient to cover the sins of ALL mankind. The reason some will find themselves cast into the lake of fire is because they reject God's all sufficient and abundant grace, mercy, lovingkindness.You are affirming that his sacrifice was not sufficient in that you say he died for all mankind and could not save all of them.
Rom 11:33-34.ForestGreenCook,
re: "Before."
OK, thanks. So if the supreme being knows before He creates a person that He will eventually be tossing the person into the lake of fire, why do you suppose He goes ahead and creates the person anyway?
If God accomplishes all of his will, and he does, you are saying that it was not his will to save all mankind, else he would have. Your belief is contradicting scriptures. All scriptures must harmonize or you do not understand the doctrine of Jesus. You are saying that the sacrifice of Jesus was sufficient to cover the sins of all mankind yet the sin of rejection is what sent them to hell. Woops! I guess his sacrifice was not sufficient to cover the sin of rejection. All scripture must harmonize or you do not understand the doctrine of Jesus.I have stated before and I will state again: The sacrifice of Jesus was sufficient to cover the sins of ALL mankind. The reason some will find themselves cast into the lake of fire is because they reject God's all sufficient and abundant grace, mercy, lovingkindness.
If God accomplishes all of his will, and he does, you are saying that it was not his will to save all mankind, else he would have. Your belief is contradicting scriptures. All scriptures must harmonize or you do not understand the doctrine of Jesus. You are saying that the sacrifice of Jesus was sufficient to cover the sins of all mankind yet the sin of rejection is what sent them to hell. Woops! I guess his sacrifice was not sufficient to cover the sin of rejection. All scripture must harmonize or you do not understand the doctrine of Jesus.
In reference to 2 Cor 5:14-15 - The one that died for all was Adam causing all to be dead. But they which live, the elect, should live unto him, Jesus, which died for them, and rose again. I direct your attention to Rom 5:15. The scape goat in leviticus is Jesus who died for many, the elect, not all mankind.I already addressed this issue when I posted about Sections 6 , 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the following article (starting with the Section named "The Two Goats of Leviticus 16"). I'm afraid it is you who is not harmonizing Scripture...
http://biblecentre.org/content.php?mode=7&item=892
Note also 2Cor5:14-15 -
"...that if one died for all, then were all dead:
15 And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again."
"He died for all" but "they which live" are not "all"
Nope. That's your line …you are saying that it was not his will to save all mankind
All Scripture does harmonize and Scripture does tell us about the unforgiveable sin.ForestGreenCook said:All scriptures must harmonize or you do not understand the doctrine of Jesus. You are saying that the sacrifice of Jesus was sufficient to cover the sins of all mankind yet the sin of rejection is what sent them to hell. Woops! I guess his sacrifice was not sufficient to cover the sin of rejection. All scripture must harmonize or you do not understand the doctrine of Jesus.
Calvinists don't like that Scripture verse. They say it makes God weak and a loser. Some even say liar. Imagine! They call God and God's Word a lie.Scripture tells us that it is God's desire that ALL men be saved and come unto the knowledge of the truth.
He knows the end from the beginningForestGreenCook,
re: "I thought I answered your question. You ask 'Does he have that knowledge before he created man?' And my answer was 'He has All foreknowledge'"
I didn't know if that meant the He has all foreknowledge before He creates a person or if it is only after He creates the person.
And BTW, you misquoted me.
I know. Unbelievable what is passed off as "rightly dividing" God's Word.Calvinists don't like that Scripture verse. They say it makes God weak and a loser. Some even say liar. Imagine! They call God and God's Word a lie.
Adam died for all to sin, Jesus died for many which is the elect.. Jesus did not die for all mankind.I already addressed this issue when I posted about Sections 6 , 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the following article (starting with the Section named "The Two Goats of Leviticus 16"). I'm afraid it is you who is not harmonizing Scripture...
http://biblecentre.org/content.php?mode=7&item=892
Note also 2Cor5:14-15 -
"...that if one died for all, then were all dead:
15 And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again."
"He died for all" but "they which live" are not "all"
Thanks for restating that. You are helping me spread the truth.I know. Unbelievable what is passed off as "rightly dividing" God's Word.
ForestGreenCook has gone so far as to insist that those spoken of in Romans 1:18-32 are not unbelievers (as revealed in the text). According to ForestGreenCook, these are "disobedient children of God"![]()
Jesus’ death is sufficient for all, but only effectual for those who have faith.Adam died for all to sin, Jesus died for many which is the elect.. Jesus did not die for all mankind.