That land is not here, And it is not now. And israel in Gen 12 15 and 17 was NO PROMISED THAT LAND. nor was it given to them as a gift..
You can post that passage 1000 times, UNTIL you look at and respond to the actual covenant given in Gen 12, 15 and 17 you will continue to fail to grasp the palestinian covenant made between God and Israel as an eternal covenant.
Okay, I didn't want to leave your post hanging out there unanswered. I read (again) the chapters you specified, and my conclusions remain the same - and by the way, I don't know what you meant by a "palestinian covenant"? I do not find it mentioned in the Bible anywhere (please post where it may be found). So, don't say that I didn't read them - I've actually read them many times in the past.
I do fail to grasp the exitance of an eternal covenant with the nation of Israel because there isn't one - not the way you intend it. However, there is one with spiritual Israel: the Israel of God. The reason I posted those verses repeatedly, is so you could see that this world, in its entirety, will be destroyed by God, so it would be impossible for any of its land, covenants (or for anything else for that matter) to be eternal. Notice in the verses I posted that the Jerusalem comes down heaven is the eternal one, not the one of earth.
If, as you claim, earthly Canaan was an eternal possession given to Israel, then my question is: has Israel been in possession of it until now? Remember, for the possession to be eternal, it has to have been Israel's from the giving of it until forever. So, was it? If there were breaks in possession, then it couldn't be eternal. However, we are assured by the Bible, that Canaan was given to Abraham's seed as an eternal possession, but which seed? The fleshly seed? No, instead, these are they who are counted as Abraham's seed and heirs of God's promise, and therefore, eternal.
[Gal 3:29 KJV]
29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
[2Co 1:20 KJV]
20 For all the promises of God in him [are] yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.
The following verses demonstrate that the nation of Israel's special relationship with God was ended by God because they did not keep His covenant.
[Jos 24:19 KJV]
19 And Joshua said unto the people, Ye cannot serve the LORD: for he [is] an holy God; he [is] a jealous God; he will not forgive your transgressions nor your sins.
[Jer 3:8-9 KJV]
8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.
9 And it came to pass through the lightness of her whoredom, that she defiled the land, and committed adultery with stones and with stocks.
[1Ki 9:6-7 KJV]
6 [But] if ye shall at all turn from following me, ye or your children, and will not keep my commandments [and] my statutes which I have set before you, but go and serve other gods, and worship them:
7 Then will I cut off Israel out of the land which I have given them; and this house, which I have hallowed for my name, will I cast out of my sight; and Israel shall be a proverb and a byword among all people:
[Jos 23:16 KJV]
16 When ye have transgressed the covenant of the LORD your God, which he commanded you, and have gone and served other gods, and bowed yourselves to them; then shall the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and ye shall perish quickly from off the good land which he hath given unto you.
Also, after thinking about it further, I want to correct something I posted yesterday based upon the following verse:
[Zep 2:5 KJV] 5 Woe unto the inhabitants of the sea coast, the nation of the Cherethites! the word of the LORD [is] against you; O Canaan, the land of the Philistines, I will even destroy thee, that there shall be no inhabitant.
My understanding was, within that context, that it was referring to the physical destruction of Canaan at the end of the world.
However, now I believe the verse to be symbolic, but I won't go into my interpretation at this time.
Nevertheless, my conclusions of the covenants remains unchanged.