Gasp I just noticed....
You're stunned by "grace" and he's Eternal "grace"!
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm![]()
Yeah, except EG should stand for Egregious Grammar!
Gasp I just noticed....
You're stunned by "grace" and he's Eternal "grace"!
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm![]()
I wonder if his ears are burning right now?Yeah, except EG should stand for Egregious Grammar!![]()
It probably counts as a negative reaction. I'm pretty sure that even the zzz counts as a negativeHey, if I am joking and hit the misspelling emoji/like button, that doesn't take away from someone in any way does it? Because I will probably be hitting it every six seconds when talking with EG...![]()
There is nothing figurative about it. You are reasoning dyadically. Scripture is quite clear that Jesus bore our sins for us in his flesh. Whether or not we understand how this is possible does not diminish the fact. I do not have to understand how God accomplished in order to believe he did. Christ bore our sin in his flesh on the cross, not symbolically but in actually. If Christ did not bear our sins, who did?
Agreed. Christ paid the penalty (death) for our sins. He became the sin offering for our sins.
He did not "become sin".
I'm outa here for awhile....
I may or may not have pushed the zzz reaction!It probably counts as a negative reaction. I'm pretty sure that even the zzz counts as a negative![]()
It probably counts as a negative reaction. I'm pretty sure that even the zzz counts as a negative![]()
I think that Christ bore our sins figuratively. How could he bear a disobedience?
I agree. It's the same difference as in 2 Cor 5:21. Was Christ "made sin", or was he "made a sin offering"?
To put this plainly, our sins were transferred to him and he bore the penalty for those sins in death. The shadow of this was the Azazel in Lev. The whole point of that animal was to have all the sins of Israel placed on the head of that animal to bear them away from the people. Like all sacrificial animals, the Azazel was the symbol or shadow of the reality. Christ is the reality.Yes, He bore our sins - bore the penalty for our sins, our sins were paid for by Him. This doesn't mean He turned into my sin. He didn't become my sin - He paid for my sin in His body, bore the punishment I deserved.
"He Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross, so that we might die to sin and live to righteousness; for by His wounds you were healed." 1Peter 2:24. Peter is not speaking metaphorically here. He is offering a statement of fact. This is not symbolic or figurative language.
His Father imputed them to Him. The Father then imputed to us His righteousness.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Oh dear Magenta may be stuck with a boring reaction,"Forever" or I could click undo reaction but wondering what my "motivation" would be!Oh no! ?Yeah, joe gave you zzz and it shows as negative. I hope I can remove it from oldhermit! Was joking about his misspelling! Yikes!
To put this plainly, our sins were transferred to him and he bore the penalty for those sins in death. The shadow of this was the Azazel in Lev. The whole point of that animal was to have all the sins of Israel placed on the head of that animal to bear them away from the people. Like all sacrificial animals, the Azazel was the symbol or shadow of the reality. Christ is the reality.
It let me undo it. Whew! And I could be wrong and dyadically means something I'm not aware of. Sorry OH, I was joking and didn't know it gave you a negative thingy.
Didn't know "thingy" could be so informative!It let me undo it. Whew! And I could be wrong and dyadically means something I'm not aware of. Sorry OH, I was joking and didn't know it gave you a negative thingy.
It's a statement of legal fact.
LOL. Dyadic reasoning is man's attempting to rationalize reality based on human lived experiences. Dyadic reasoning is a belief structure that attempts to refine and conceptualize the question of cause and effect based upon observable conditions.It let me undo it. Whew! And I could be wrong and dyadically means something I'm not aware of. Sorry OH, I was joking and didn't know it gave you a negative thingy.
Oh dear Magenta may be stuck with a boring reaction,"Forever" or I could click undo reaction but wondering what my "motivation" would be!![]()
LOL. Dyadic reasoning is man's attempting to rationalize reality based on human lived experiences. Dyadic reasoning is a belief structure that attempts to refine and conceptualize the question of cause and effect based upon observable conditions.
It can "reach" that many"miles" away??????My broom on your bottom is the motivation young man!!![]()