E
eternally-gratefull
Guest
In daniel 7?when you look at the interlinear translation you definitely see five parts, not four.
In daniel 7?when you look at the interlinear translation you definitely see five parts, not four.
yes the fourth beast.In Daniel Chapter 7, we are told about four beasts or kingdoms (lion, bear, leopard with four heads, a fourth one different from the first three and it has ten horns which represent ten kings, and another horn , a small one, came up among them and at the same time three of the first horns are flucked up (This small horn is a king and it will humiliate three kings) . This small horn with eyes and a mouth will be in war with the holy ones but the holy ones will get the kingdom. So this small horn is a king or kingdom COMING FROM THE FOURTH ONE and he will speak against God and will harass the holy ones but then comes God's kingdom!
Where do you get Islam?
The legs and toes are shown in Dan 7 as the 4th beast. Not two separate beasts.
My question is still the same can you explain why Islam is the fifth kingdom?

Only the `10 toes` are the same as the `10 kings` of the 4th beast in Dan. 7.
Islam is from other scriptures.
The Assyrian. (Isa. 31: 8) That is the region of Iraq, Syria and Jordan. They were one region until the allies after WW 1 divided them up between Britain and France. That is the uprooting of the 3 horns, the 3 kingdoms, which will come under the A/C`s rule. (Dan. 7: 8)
The King of the north, (of Israel). (Dan. 11: 40) That is the region that was part of the divided up after Alexander died. Dan. 11 goes through what happened in that region till the `appointed time.`
The king of Babylon. (Rev. 17 & 18) (Zech. 6: 5 - 11 tells of the economic and religious aspects of the Global Government going to the land of Shinar - Iraq and Babylon.)
It is still rome. Not islam.
The iron in the toes is significant. It is rome broken. Thats why the fourth beast (rome) of daniel 7 has some it has already accomplished. And some that are yet future.
YepThe word `iron` is a descriptive word NOT a noun, not the name. It means `strong.`
Yep
And rome was strong. The strongest yet. And future rome will be even stronger
Islam is not strong. It is weak.
He beast will rule the worldThat`s right it is partly strong and partly weak - Sunni and Shi-ite aspects of Islam.
`As the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly fragile.` (Dan. 2: 42)
Who is killing Christians in Afghanistan, Nigeria etc....?
He beast will rule the world
Islam can not even conquer Israel.
The beast is a ten kingdom european confederacy. Which will be ruled by the man of sin.
The prince who is to come of Dan 9. The one who comes from the people who destroyed the city and sanctuary.
you seemed to have missed the point of the passage.You seem to have missed this comment I made.
.....partly strong and partly weak - Sunni and Shi-ite aspects of Islam.
`As the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly fragile.` (Dan. 2: 42)
Who is killing Christians in Afghanistan, Nigeria etc....?
And BTW I do not see the EU killing Christians or even wanting to go to war.
I can see what your sayingI really don't think that the iron and clay are talking about Islam. In my opinion, what the iron and clay are representing is a familiar Bible contrast; those who are strong in faith and those who are not; much the same as only part of the virgins were ready at Christ's coming in the parable of the virgins, so also only some are in the faith correctly at that time while some are not. Remember, in the Bible, iron can be a picture of the word of wisdom (iron sharpens iron - Ecc 10:10, Proverbs 27:17); Daniel chapter 2 tells us that the clay and the iron are divided and do not mix. Remember, Jesus came not to bring peace but division in terms of salvation; some are in his word and some are not
you seemed to have missed the point of the passage.
1. They rule the world. Not christians.
2. Partly strong and partly weak is in reference to the fact it is not a complete dictatorship. The 9 kings give their power to the beast (man of sin) but it is loosely bound.
3. There are ten kings. Not 2
4. Its not religion. It is a Gentile nation who is ruling the world
5. Again, Islam can not even conquer Israel. How are they going to military conquer the world and hold off the kings who will go against her?
my question: we are told about an Ottoman empire but it doesn't exist anymore. The Germanic tribes didn't have an empire. When we are told about Babylonia, there were different kings who maintained the empire, same for the Medo-Persian empire and Greece and Rome. The Ottoman empire and the German tribes don't have the same continuity. Moreover, God's kingdom was supposed to come in the days of those kings? What about England who had the biggest world empire and what about America who has had the military and political powers till now?
I can see what your saying
But if the head of Gold represented Babylon and the other three represented media-persia, greece, and the rome of Christs day. (literal kingdoms) Why would the final aspect of the statue represent anything other than a gentile kingdom? A time period which paul calls the time of the gentiles in Romans 11?
my question: we are told about an Ottoman empire but it doesn't exist anymore. The Germanic tribes didn't have an empire. When we are told about Babylonia, there were different kings who maintained the empire, same for the Medo-Persian empire and Greece and Rome. The Ottoman empire and the German tribes don't have the same continuity. Moreover, God's kingdom was supposed to come in the days of those kings? What about England who had the biggest world empire and what about America who has had the military and political powers till now?
Considering the symbolic significance of iron discussed in the brief synopsis at symbolismandmetaphor.com, that the feet are of iron mixed with clay alludes to a 'toned' down, more, if you will, (supposedly) humble or down to earth (signified by clay), form of government(s) or ruling class. And I'm not certain that 10 is a distinct count of rulers or merely alluding to the symbolism of 'yod' (10th and smallest letter), the number of humility as well as other significances such as the 10 generations from Adam to Noah, 10 plagues, and 10 sons of Haman, etc. But here is certainly a more 'humanistic' approach to government these days.