Daniel 9 Already Fulfilled

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,923
2,118
113
Notice the beginning events of the Olivet Discourse from Matthew 24:

1) Deception by many claiming Christ - (this is literally the antichrist spirit)
2) Wars and rumors of wars
3) Famine
4) Pestilences -
Death
5) Specifically, the Apostles would be killed
6) Abomination of desolation
7) Days cut short for the sake of The elect
.
Notice the same order of events from Luke 21:

1) Deception by many claiming Christ - (this is literally the antichrist spirit)
2) Wars and rumors of wars
3) Famine

4) Pestilences - Death
5) Specifically, the Apostles would be killed
6) Jerusalem is surrounded by armies (desolation neigh)
7) ...
It seems to me that you have left off the idea expressed in verse 12 (Lk21), which says, "BUT BEFORE ALL THESE...," referring to #s 1-4 in the GREEN / "BUT BEFORE ALL THESE IN GREEN" ^ i.e. "BEFORE ALL the beginning of birth pangs," [before those] the 70ad events of vv.12-24a,b must take place (first, BEFORE ALL of those).



This means that your numbers 5-7 should come BEFORE numbers 1-4, sequentially, as far as Luke 21 goes.



Check it out. :)





This is the part most people overlook (the "sequential issues" in the Olivet Discourse).
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,399
1,006
113
Oh, I took partial preterism to be a camp within Preterism. I only know of the primary position. If I'm mistaken by all means share its specific position like others have theirs.
Partial Preterism

Partial Preterism (often referred to as Orthodox Preterism or Classical Preterism) may hold that most eschatological prophecies, such as the destruction of Jerusalem, the Antichrist, the Great Tribulation, and the advent of the Day of the Lord as a "judgment-coming" of Christ, were fulfilled either in AD 70 or during the persecution of Christians under the Emperor Nero. (Wiki)

I am not saying that Partial Preterism is a correct interpretation in Eschatology. Rather it must be included among the views in eschatology.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,399
1,006
113
.


It seems to me that you have left off the idea expressed in verse 12 (Lk21), which says, "BUT BEFORE ALL THESE...," referring to #s 1-4 in the GREEN / "BUT BEFORE ALL THESE IN GREEN" ^ i.e. "BEFORE ALL the beginning of birth pangs" the 70ad events of vv.12-24a,b must take place.

This means that your numbers 5-7 should come BEFORE numbers 1-4, sequentially, as far as Luke 21 goes.

Check it out. :)





This is the part most people overlook (the "sequential issues" in the Olivet Discourse).
Don't start quoting from Luke 21 you will destroy the eschatology based on Matthew 24.

Talk about a party pooper.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,883
4,346
113
mywebsite.us
How can any eschatological view that includes the Second Coming of Christ / 'Day of the Lord' event(s) as past history not be considered to be "full" Preterism???
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,399
1,006
113
So there have been multiple threads debating this view, but I just wanted to share the reasons why many of us believe the prophecies of Daniel 9 have already been fulfilled.

For background and context, I take a Historicist view of eschatology which is the traditional view of the protestant reformers before the counter-reformation offered up the two opposing views of preterism and futurism (with futurism being the current view held by many modern Christians).

A quick and dirty summary of each:

- Preterism = All endtime prophecies were fulfilled in 70 AD. The Messiah is currently ruling on His throne.

- Historicism = Endtime prophecies are fulfilled progressively throughout human history, proving that God steers human events.

- Futurism = All endtime prophecies will be fulfilled in the future after a gap period called the church age.


So, generally speaking...

- Preterists take the position that the Messiah currently is ruling the world from His throne in heaven.

- Historicists take the position that we have been in the end times for the last 2k years; everything happening is laid out by God's end-time prophecies.

- Futurists take the position that after the church is raptured away, the clock will continue and the end times will begin.


As I mentioned, the traditional view of eschatology by the protestant reformers was Historicism and their argument was that the Almighty is sovereign, and proof of His sovereignty is knowing exactly what will happen from beginning to end. There is no scenario where He doesn't know, so any prophecy He shares - especially prophecy that principally involves time - will be a complete timeline of events.

For example, The Almighty gave King Nebuchadnezzar this dream in Daniel 2:

View attachment 258545

Everyone agrees that this was a visual representation of a timeline the Almighty gave to King Neb, starting with Babylon and ending with The Messiah's kingdom. So, it's a complete timeline of human history, with each section representing a world-ruling kingdom until the toes are smashed by the stone from heaven (Messiah).

- Babylon
- Medo-Persia
- Macedonia // Greece
- Rome
- 10 Smaller Mixed Kingdoms
- Messiah's Kingdom

And per the magnificence of the Almighty's imagery, even the characteristics we see from the statue were representative of the kingdoms that rule:

1) Gold was the economy of Babylon

2) There were two arms folded. Medo-Persia was a partnership of two kingdoms, and silver was their economy.

3) With Greece, humanity literally entered into the bronze age

4) The time of Rome was known as the Iron Age...and there were even two legs of the empire: The Byzantine Empire and the Western Roman Empire. Also, notice that this section is the longest section of the statue. And in fulfillment, The Roman Empire experienced by far the longest run.

5) Next, humanity reaches the ten toes which are a mix of clay and iron. Meanwhile, revelation speaks of ten smaller kingdoms prophesied to emerge in the end times. So if we follow the pattern that The Almighty has given, then the ten smaller kingdoms will have characteristics of the Roman Empire and characteristics of "Clay" (the original Hebrew word used was "Arab"). The ten smaller kingdoms will be mixtures of Roman and Arabic influences (Algebra or "Al' jabr ", the basis of math, being one example). Also, the prophecy says the iron/clay mixture never completely combines, meaning that the people of the ten kingdoms will never truly be unified.

NOTE: At no point was this statue described to break until the toes were smashed by the heavenly stone, representing an unbroken timeline of human history as we go from one kingdom age to the next until Messiah.

----

Now, as history will show, both preterism and futurism views were developed by the Catholic Church to counter historicism. The reason why historicism was countered was because the reformers began identifying the Catholic Church as The Great Harlot and the Papacy as the Beast of the Sea. So, during the counter-reformation, two newer views of eschatology began to spread. This brings us to Daniel 9.


Daniel 9

The preterist view holds that all of Daniel 9:24-27 (i.e., The 70 Weeks prophecy) was fulfilled in 70 AD, while the futurist view holds that only 69 weeks have been fulfilled followed by our current pause/break of an indetermate amount of time (never once mentioned to happen by The Almighty or Messiah or any angel), with the 70th week beginning the time of Great Tribulation after the break. If we were to lay out these views using King Neb's statue to represent the timeline each view would look like this:


Preterism - "Humanity is currently in the post-stone period called the kingdom of God, where Messiah rules from heaven."

View attachment 258551


Futurism - "Humanity is currently in a gap period called the Church Age, and will be raptured away before the end times begin."
View attachment 258549


Meanwhile, historicists believe that all 70 weeks were fulfilled in 70 AD, leading to the destruction of Jerusalem and the scattering of the people, (both of which are the "desolations" prophesied in Daniel 9:27), and that the land would be devoid of the people who are supposed to be there until the return of the Messiah when He establishes His eternal kingdom on earth. Historicists also believe that the Great Tribulation equates to the time in human history when the nations of the world collectively hated and persecuted the Jews as "murderers of Christ", spanning 1,260 years and directly involving the Papacy.

----

I think this is a good enough intro. Let me know if you have any questions.

Blessings.
If the book of Revelation will be fulfilled at some point in the 21st Century. Would that mean that the book of Revelation had no relevance for two thousand years?
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,399
1,006
113
How can any eschatological view that includes the Second Coming of Christ / 'Day of the Lord' event(s) as past history not be considered to be "full" Preterism???
Full Preterism states all prophecy was fulfilled in the first century. Partial Preterism states that not all prophecy was fulfilled in the first century.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,883
4,346
113
mywebsite.us
Partial Preterism (often referred to as Orthodox Preterism or Classical Preterism) may hold that most eschatological prophecies, such as the destruction of Jerusalem, the Antichrist, the Great Tribulation, and the advent of the Day of the Lord as a "judgment-coming" of Christ, were fulfilled either in AD 70 or during the persecution of Christians under the Emperor Nero. (Wiki)
Full Preterism states all prophecy was fulfilled in the first century. Partial Preterism states that not all prophecy was fulfilled in the first century.
??????????

What part of the definition above exists outside of the first century?

Does it not suggest that everything it lists is believed by "Partial Preterism" to have occurred in the first century?

It is obviously not a good definition...? Did I miss something...?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,923
2,118
113
Don't start quoting from Luke 21 you will destroy the eschatology based on Matthew 24.
Right... but not in the way you expect (seeing as you hold to Preterism, I think);

Luke 21 SEQUENTIALLY starts with the 70ad events ("BEFORE ALL" the beginning of birth pangs), per v.12;

moves from there (sequentially) to the "beginning of birth pangs" of vv.8-11 (same as found in Matt24:4-8 / Mk13:5-8)... which are the Seals of Rev6 (and which Paul speaks of the INITIAL one of those ["birth pang [singular]"], in his words found in 1Th5:1-3, speaking of the ARRIVAL of "the Day of the Lord"), and which "Seals" are included WITHIN "the things which must come to pass IN QUICKNESS [noun]" per Rev1:1 [1:19c/4:1] and which "in quickness" time-period ends with Christ's Second Coming to the earth Rev19.




Additionally, as I've pointed out in past posts, Lk21:32's "This generation shall not pass away TILL ALL shall have taken place" must necessarily include the "of-lengthy-duration" items verse 24 had just referred to:

("and they shall be led away captive into all the nations, AND Jerusalem shall be TRODDEN DOWN [Rv11:2] of the Gentiles UNTIL the TIMES of the Gentiles be fulfilled [at His Second Coming to the earth Rev19 time-slot]" (not speaking of "the Church age," but Neb's "dream / statue / image" and "Gentile domination over Israel" (the toes of the statue, yet). The "TIMES" of the Gentiles not being the same meaning as the phrase "the FULNESS of the Gentiles be come in [G1525]" (Rom11:25[,15]).



So,
Matthew 24:4-8 STARTS OUT with that which takes place [sequentially] "AFTER" the 70ad events, meaning, "the beginning of birth pangs" come SEQUENTIALLY AFTER the 70ad events... and then vv.9-14 come next... then after that comes the AOD (the one Dan12:11 "SET UP" spoke to, specifically), which is the kick-off point to the "GREAT tribulation" (1260 days remain until Christ's Second Coming to the earth Rev19, at that point--so ENDS at Matt24:29-31 / Isa27:9,12-13 / parts of Dan9:24 / Rom11:27).

Talk about a party pooper.
THANKS! :D Woo Hoo!
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,883
4,346
113
mywebsite.us
Don't start quoting from Luke 21 you will destroy the eschatology based on Matthew 24.
Why should that be? The two accounts (indeed, all three) of the Olivet Discourse are in 100% total agreement, alignment, and synchronization. ;)
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,505
468
83
5) Next, humanity reaches the ten toes which are a mix of clay and iron. Meanwhile, revelation speaks of ten smaller kingdoms prophesied to emerge in the end times. So if we follow the pattern that The Almighty has given, then the ten smaller kingdoms will have characteristics of the Roman Empire and characteristics of "Clay" (the original Hebrew word used was "Arab"). The ten smaller kingdoms will be mixtures of Roman and Arabic influences (Algebra or "Al' jabr ", the basis of math, being one example). Also, the prophecy says the iron/clay mixture never completely combines, meaning that the people of the ten kingdoms will never truly be unified.
If you are saying the ten kingdoms will be X, how are you claiming Daniel has been fulfilled?
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,505
468
83
Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city,
[1] to finish the transgression,
[2] and to make an end of sins,
[3] and to make reconciliation for iniquity,
[4] and to bring in everlasting righteousness,
[5]and to seal up the vision and prophecy,
[6] and to anoint the most Holy.

What we are seeing at the present all around the world is the EXACT OPPOSITE. We are seeing Satan's minions preparing the world for the reign of the Antichrist. So evil and wickedness are on the increase. But God says in Daniel 9:24 that all of this will be gone and EVERLASTING RIGHTEOUSNESS will be established on earth after the Second Coming of Christ.
Is the righteousness offered in the New Covenant not 'oLaM?
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,505
468
83
The cross and the resurrection OFFER SALVATION to humanity. But the majority of humanity at this point are not saved. So how can "everlasting righteousness" be attributed to the unsaved, the ungodly, and the wicked?
Jesus' incarnation, life, death, resurrection and ascension to sit at God's right hand "brought in" (Hiphil form of Bo' , to lead in, bring in, cause to come in) 'oLaM righteousness. :Bring in: does not have to mean "establish worldwide". You are reading that into Daniel 9:24. But it is not inherently there. Jesus introduced the cl=ear teaching of 'oLaM righteousness by grace through faith into the world.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,923
2,118
113
^ @PaulThomson 's Post #212,

Consider the following verse:

Acts 17:31nasb -
"because He has fixed [/established] a day [i.e. the MK (not a "singular 24-hr day" kind of 'day')] in which He will judge [/govern] the world in righteousness through a Man whom He has appointed, having furnished proof to all men by raising Him from the dead."
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,923
2,118
113
^ Consider also the following passage:

Rev19:14-15a -

And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall ['future tense' to His return to the earth in Rev19] rule [/shepherd] them [the nations] with a rod [/sceptre; see Heb1:8 "a sceptre of righteousness"] of iron [i.e. 'of righteousness and strength']:"

[see also Rev2:26-27a "...he that overcometh, and keepeth My works unto the end, to him will I give power [/authority] over the nations: And he shall rule [/shepherd; same Grk word as in Rev7:17 (see Isa49:10--MK verse)] them with a rod [/sceptre] of iron [/righteousness and strength]; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: EVEN AS I have received of My Father"]
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,923
2,118
113
^ Consider what the following commentary has to say:

[quoting from Bible Gateway]

Daniel 9:24

Amplified Bible

Seventy Weeks and the Messiah
24 “Seventy weeks [of years, or 490 years] [a]have been decreed for your people and for your holy city (Jerusalem), to finish the transgression, to make an end of sins, to make atonement (reconciliation) for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness (right-standing with God), to seal up vision and prophecy and prophet, and to anoint the Most Holy Place.
Read full chapter
Footnotes
  1. Daniel 9:24 I.e. cut off, decided, determined. This phrase occurs only here and indicates a period of time set aside for a certain purpose. The prophecy that follows pertains only to the Jews and Jerusalem. It records six objectives to be achieved by the Messiah. The first three are resolved by the death and resurrection of Jesus; the final three are resolved at His second coming.
[end quoting]









However, consider that Daniel 9:24 [parts] and Romans 11:27 and Isaiah 27:9,12-13 [/Matthew 24:29-31] are speaking to the same issue, "when I shall take away THEIR [/Israel's] SIN"

Compare also with what we see in Hosea 5:14-6:3, where v.15 says, "I will go and return to My place [i.e. at His ascension], TILL they acknowledge THEIR OFFENCE, and seek My face: IN THEIR AFFLICTION [i.e. yet future, Rev6-19] THEY WILL seek Me early / earnestly" [chpt 6:1-3 then provides the timing issue regarding this]
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,505
468
83
^ @PaulThomson 's Post #212,

Consider the following verse:

Acts 17:31nasb -
"because He has fixed [/established] a day [i.e. the MK (not a "singular 24-hr day" kind of 'day')] in which He will judge [/govern] the world in righteousness through a Man whom He has appointed, having furnished proof to all men by raising Him from the dead."
Now prove that "has fixed a day in which He will judge the world in righteousness" means the same thing as "to bring in 'oLaM righteousness" .
 

Yahshua

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2013
2,915
817
113
.


It seems to me that you have left off the idea expressed in verse 12 (Lk21), which says, "BUT BEFORE ALL THESE...," referring to #s 1-4 in the GREEN / "BUT BEFORE ALL THESE IN GREEN" ^ i.e. "BEFORE ALL the beginning of birth pangs," [before those] the 70ad events of vv.12-24a,b must take place (first, BEFORE ALL of those).



This means that your numbers 5-7 should come BEFORE numbers 1-4, sequentially, as far as Luke 21 goes.



Check it out. :)





This is the part most people overlook (the "sequential issues" in the Olivet Discourse).
Sure, let's look at it...I've gone over this before but it's been a while...

The verse you're referring to is Luke 21:11-12. After the disciples ask Him (1) when the temple will be destroyed and (2) what will be the sign of His coming, Messiah begins listing the events. In Luke, He lists deception, then wars, and then we read...


Luke 21:11-12
And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven. But before all these, they shall lay their hands on you, and persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues, and into prisons, being brought before kings and rulers for my name's sake.


Question: How should we interpret this passage? What's more plausible?:

a) "[deception, war, famine, pestilences, and fearful sights & great signs], ......< but before all these...[apostles killed]"?

OR

b) "deception, war, famine, pestilences.......[and fearful sights & great signs], but before all these...[apostles killed]"?


Modern punctuation didn't exist when these were written so we can't really rely on it here. We need to rely on the context shared at the beginning of the passage (i.e., the First question: "When will that temple be destroyed?") and the context shared by each account because the testimony of two or more establishes a truth.


Matthew 24:

- Deception

- Wars & Rumors

- Famines

- Pestilences

- Earthquakes (in diverse places)

["These are the beginning of sorrows, then..."]

- They shall kill you [He's speaking to His disciples]

- The gospel of the kingdom will be preached to all nations, and then the end shall come [What "end"? what's the first question?]

- Abomination of Desolation ("Flee...!")

- Time of Great Tribulation...("if anyone says christ is here secret, don't go")

- Great Signs in Heaven and on Earth

- The Son



Mark 13:

- Deception

- Wars & Rumors

- Earthquakes (in diverse places)

- Famines

- Troubles

["These are the beginning of sorrows..."]

- They shall deliver you up [He's speaking to His disciples]

- The gospel must first be published among all nations, then you shall be delivered up. Endure until the end. [What "end"? what's the first question?]

- Abomination of Desolation ("Flee...!")

- Affliction in those days...("if anyone says lo christ is here, don't go")

- Sun darkened, moon does not give light, stars will fall

- The Son


Matthew and Mark each list the same events as "the beginning of sorrows" before the disciples were to be persecuted and killed for their testimony, and then the end comes. "The end of what?" In context, the end of the temple. This was the first question they asked and the first question Messiah answered. And we know for a fact that the temple ended in 70 AD. We also know for a fact that the apostles were martyred in the first century before 70 AD. These two events are constants fixed in time.

So whether we interpret the "beginning of sorrows" events to happen before the martyrdom of the disciples or after their martyrdom, all of it happens before "the end": before the 70 AD destruction of that temple. This is why there are more events Messiah prophesies after "the end" because the first question was about the temple's end. The rest of what He shares answers the second question.

----

Meanwhile, Luke lists the same "beginning of sorrows" events, and yet also mentions "fearful signs from heaven" but adds "but before all these" the disciples will be killed after giving their testimony. Before all of what? Is it before all of the events listed or just before the fearful signs from heaven?


Luke 21:

- Deception

- Wars & Rumors

- Earthquakes (in diverse places)

- Famines

- Pestilences

- Fearful sights and great signs from heaven

- [But before all these...]

- They shall lay their hands on you [He's speaking to His disciples]

- And it shall turn to you for a testimony

- Ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, desolation near ("Flee...!")

- Wrath upon this people

- Signs in the sun, moon, and stars...distress of nations, fear

- The Son


So Luke also lists a series of events leading to the desolation of Jerusalem and the temple (the first question Messiah is answering). But in Luke, there are two mentions of fearful signs in heaven, with the first mention preceding the phrase "but before all these [the disciples will be killed]". So what's more plausible when we consider Matthew, Mark, Luke, and recorded history? Was that phrase referring to all the events listed or referring just to the fearful signs from heaven?

The simplest explanation is that the writer means "Before all these > (fearful signs from heaven) the apostles will be killed", which would perfectly harmonize the text with the other gospels.
 

Yahshua

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2013
2,915
817
113
If the book of Revelation will be fulfilled at some point in the 21st Century. Would that mean that the book of Revelation had no relevance for two thousand years?
Based on futurism?
 

Yahshua

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2013
2,915
817
113
If you are saying the ten kingdoms will be X, how are you claiming Daniel has been fulfilled?
I think you're asking a question about what I've posted regarding Daniel 2? No, I'm saying Daniel 9 has been fulfilled from a historicist pov, and was using Daniel 2 as part of my setup in the OP.

But to address the ten kingdoms; I believe we're currently living in the time of those ten kingdoms...we just don't identify as ten distinct kingdoms. Kind of like how we're all from just three sons but presently we don't identify with just three groups of humanity but with over 195 nations/groups.

Similarly, I believe we already exist as the ten-toed mixed nations; being a mixture of Roman and Arabic influences (i.e., Western & Eastern) but we also do not cleave to each other, clashing constantly (i.e., Western way of life vs. Eastern way of life).

This is why I also fully believe we will never become a one-world government (until Messiah comes) no matter how hard the powers that be try to make it happen. It's literally impossible because scripture (Daniel 2) says we never mix.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
Jesus' incarnation, life, death, resurrection and ascension to sit at God's right hand "brought in" (Hiphil form of Bo' , to lead in, bring in, cause to come in) 'oLaM righteousness. :Bring in: does not have to mean "establish worldwide". You are reading that into Daniel 9:24. But it is not inherently there. Jesus introduced the cl=ear teaching of 'oLaM righteousness by grace through faith into the world.
Totally incorrect. Since whatever you said did not FINISH THE TRANSGRESSION or result in AN END OF SINS (seen Dan 9:24) you are seriously mistaken. What the sacrifice of Christ did was to make eternal life available to all mankind. And only a small number has believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. To bring in EVERLASTING RIGHTEOUSNESS is to literally establish that on the earth. That can only happen after the Second Coming of Christ. And I have already quoted Scriptures to support this.