Charlie Kirk Shot

[Dude653]

He spoke words and promoted open and honest conversation. That's it. That's his crime. He listened, debated and discussed with reason, patience and humor. He taught many young people how to critically think. He pointed out facts, statistics, and the truth of Christ. He INVITED those who hated him to have a discussion. That's extreme to you? Fascists and extremists don't INVITE their opposition into an open discussion. He didn't yell, scream, and cuss at people. He didn't call his supporters to violence. Quite the opposite.

And for that you claim he deserved to be assassinated? Yeah, you said what you said, and it's evil.

What I see at work from your side is fear. The absolute fear of allowing others to have their own beliefs and opinions when it goes against yours because they may actually cause you to think and they may actually be right.

There is no denying this fact: Anyone daring to disagree with progressives/leftists are screamed and cussed at, berated, violently threatened, locked out of speaking opportunities [silenced], beaten up, abused, and murdered because you are terrified of words and ideas contrary to your own. That is serious brownshirt behavior.

Yeah I wasn't a big fan of the guy either but he did encourage open debate over violence
I'd like to have seen him debate one of the intellectual heavyweights like Sam Harris

 

[PennEd]

And for that you claim he deserved to be assassinated? Yeah, you said what you said, and it's evil.

People are getting fired all over the country for saying less than this supposed Christian said about the assassination.

Evil, can't, or choose not, to see their own evil. Pretty par for the course with that guy.

 

[Kroogz]

Gun violence is never acceptable. By the way, there was another school shooting in Colorado yesterday.

Everything is just an inanimate object to the left. Morals, integrity,responsibility,right and wrong......Are never on their radar.

How are the left supposed to kill all the conservatives if they get guns banned?....Everything woke...........

 

[Kroogz]

He was a right-wing extremist and activist. Not to mention a racist and a bigot. Don't let his boyish good looks fool you. It's not known if it was politically motivated, though that would be a reasonable guess.

I have compassion for those he left behind, who loved him; but I'm not at all shocked or surprised by this. It was predictable. You reap what you sow.

You have never listened to Charlie Kirk then. You just have left wing talking points.

This stuff is predictable for the left............Because they are the most violent group in America.

 

[Texasgal]

If it turns out to be one of the alien invaders or a State actor, you know what must be done.

Hard to tell, but I don’t believe illegal aliens are capable of doing that. I could be wrong, though. State actor? Also hard to know.

What is possible to do is to make an educated guess based on the facts presented as of now.

Distance was somewhere between 150-200 yards. Shooter was aiming downward from a roof. Shooter had a visual on Mr. Kirk, who was slightly moving his head and torso. Shooter hit him in the neck. Shooter was aware that if he aimed mid between the visual top and bottom and mid between the left and right side of the torso he (or she), would most likely make a lethal shot. The hit in the neck indicates that the shooter was aware of the challenge of shooting downward. The shooter was most likely aiming at center mass. Probably not aiming for the neck. But as I said. For a pro it was like aiming at a barn from ten feet away.

Now, that doesn’t mean that it actually was a pro, but chances are that it was. An amateur would probably not be able to keep the rifle steady in a situation like this, and missed.

All of what I’m saying is guessing, and we will probably be surprised to learn whoever it was.

 

[Edward429451]

A single shot from 200 yards, it was a political assassination, not some random college kid, and it was because the power of the populist movement is with college kids. People always see some leftist lunatic debating with Charlie, what they are missing is the massive crowds that have been building supporting and inviting him to the campuses.

I never thought about that. They said it was while Charlie was talking to a transformer like it was gbtz thing or whatever they call it. A government hit on Charlie Kirk. Not too surprising if you think about it.

 

[Kroogz]

Hard to tell, but I don’t believe illegal aliens are capable of doing that. I could be wrong, though. State actor? Also hard to know.

What is possible to do is to make an educated guess based on the facts presented as of now.

Distance was somewhere between 150-200 yards. Shooter was aiming downward from a roof. Shooter had a visual on Mr. Kirk, who was slightly moving his head and torso. Shooter hit him in the neck. Shooter was aware that if he aimed mid between the visual top and bottom and mid between the left and right side of the torso he (or she), would most likely make a lethal shot. The hit in the neck indicates that the shooter was aware of the challenge of shooting downward. The shooter was most likely aiming at center mass. Probably not aiming for the neck. But as I said. For a pro it was like aiming at a barn from ten feet away.

Now, that doesn’t mean that it actually was a pro, but chances are that it was. An amateur would probably not be able to keep the rifle steady in a situation like this, and missed.

All of what I’m saying is guessing, and we will probably be surprised to learn whoever it was.

One thing I bet all my money on..........It was not a "she."

 

[Texasgal]

One thing I bet all my money on..........It was not a "she."

You would be surprised to know how many female snipers USAF and other armed forces have.

 

[Kroogz]

A single shot from 200 yards, it was a political assassination, not some random college kid, and it was because the power of the populist movement is with college kids. People always see some leftist lunatic debating with Charlie, what they are missing is the massive crowds that have been building supporting and inviting him to the campuses.

When I was a teenager, me and my buddies shot golf balls at 300 yards........consistently.

The universities and public education can and do "turn" a bunch of these normal folks into monsters.

 

[Kroogz]

You would be surprised to know how many female snipers USAF and other armed forces have.

No, I would not.(In fact, I know.)

I bet all my money that this was not a "she."

 

[Texasgal]

No, I would not.

I bet all my money that this was not a "she."

You’re most likely right. I’m just not ruling out any possibility.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

I think the guy that's pictured being arrested right after and who approached local LEO's turning himself in saying,I shot Charlie Kirk, was a decoy. Detaining him as a confessor right there insured the perimeter wouldn't be locked down. And that would let the sniper to access their escape route unimpeded.

That's very good insight!
We ask ourselves, what motive would some random middle aged person on a college campus have for claiming to have committed a heinous crime?
That's more than unusual.
This is bizarre....... unless he serves a purpose to someone with a motive.
Then we ask, what purpose would he serve?

I think you answered it.

 

[Kroogz]

Hard to tell, but I don’t believe illegal aliens are capable of doing that. I could be wrong, though. State actor? Also hard to know.

What is possible to do is to make an educated guess based on the facts presented as of now.

Distance was somewhere between 150-200 yards. Shooter was aiming downward from a roof. Shooter had a visual on Mr. Kirk, who was slightly moving his head and torso. Shooter hit him in the neck. Shooter was aware that if he aimed mid between the visual top and bottom and mid between the left and right side of the torso he (or she), would most likely make a lethal shot. The hit in the neck indicates that the shooter was aware of the challenge of shooting downward. The shooter was most likely aiming at center mass. Probably not aiming for the neck. But as I said. For a pro it was like aiming at a barn from ten feet away.

Now, that doesn’t mean that it actually was a pro, but chances are that it was. An amateur would probably not be able to keep the rifle steady in a situation like this, and missed.

All of what I’m saying is guessing, and we will probably be surprised to learn whoever it was.

Not to deter from the pro's. But many farm boys and girls can shoot an eyeball out of a prairie dog at 300 yards or better.

We didn't have the technology back then. But today, you can send in your caliber, bullet weight and velocity and the scope company will design a scope by setting it to the exact performance of your gun. Just"click" and you are set to 100/200/300/400 yards. These are amazingly accurate and require little experience.

Who knows?

 

[ZNP]

Not to deter from the pro's. But many farm boys and girls can shoot an eyeball out of a prairie dog at 300 yards or better.

We didn't have the technology back then. But today, you can send in your caliber, bullet weight and velocity and the scope company will design a scope by setting it to the exact performance of your gun. Just"click" and you are set to 100/200/300/400 yards. These are amazingly accurate and require little experience.

Who knows?

shooting golf balls and prairie dogs not the same as shooting a human being. The man who offered himself up indicates this was a consipiracy to help the shooter escape the perimeter.

Accuracy in shooting is only one of the skills necessary for a sniper to evade the security that Charlie Kirk had and that the University and city had after the shooting.

 

[Texasgal]

Not to deter from the pro's. But many farm boys and girls can shoot an eyeball out of a prairie dog at 300 yards or better.

We didn't have the technology back then. But today, you can send in your caliber, bullet weight and velocity and the scope company will design a scope by setting it to the exact performance of your gun. Just"click" and you are set to 100/200/300/400 yards. These are amazingly accurate and require little experience.

Who knows?

But then there’s the thing about keeping that rifle steady…and for some reason I don’t think this was done by a farm boy or girl.

 

[Kroogz]

But then there’s the thing about keeping that rifle steady…and for some reason I don’t think this was done by a farm boy or girl.

A bipod or coat to keep it steady. Not hard. Keeping the rifle steady is a no brainier for pros and amateurs alike.

But I tend to agree with you. Charlie was making the left very nervous......an inside job would not surprise me.

But, I wouldn't be surprised by a farm boy or girl turned evil by the system.

 

[Texasgal]

A bipod or coat to keep it steady. Not hard. Keeping the rifle steady is a no brainier for pros and amateurs alike.

But I tend to agree with you. Charlie was making the left very nervous......an inside job would not surprise me.

But, I wouldn't be surprised by a farm boy or girl turned evil by the system.

I agree, long as you are aiming at sitting ducks. This was a human being. A bipod can’t erase your own body’s trembling completely.

 

[Kroogz]

shooting golf balls and prairie dogs not the same as shooting a human being. The man who offered himself up indicates this was a consipiracy to help the shooter escape the perimeter.

Accuracy in shooting is only one of the skills necessary for a sniper to evade the security that Charlie Kirk had and that the University and city had after the shooting.

Just offering perspectives.

You have watched Charlie Kirk in his open debates with the freaks right? Hate and death in their eyes. All possibilities are open for me.

 

[Kroogz]

I agree, long as you are aiming at sitting ducks. This was a human being. A bipod can’t erase your own body’s trembling completely.

Don't put your own emotions into an emotionless freak.

 

[Kroogz]

shooting golf balls and prairie dogs not the same as shooting a human being. The man who offered himself up indicates this was a consipiracy to help the shooter escape the perimeter.

Accuracy in shooting is only one of the skills necessary for a sniper to evade the security that Charlie Kirk had and that the University and city had after the shooting.

One thing I think we need to understand and GET......We are golf balls and prairie dogs according to the left.