They are already without excuse, according to Romans 1.
I believe men fit themselves for destruction as per Romans 9. I believe this would be true of everyone if God did not purpose otherwise.
Is that destruction "hell" ... probably not.
They are already without excuse, according to Romans 1.
I believe men fit themselves for destruction as per Romans 9. I believe this would be true of everyone if God did not purpose otherwise.
So, more ignoring the questions that I am interested in, and more blather and pontificating. This is why having the discussion is impossible.There will never really be a dialogue, all we can do is point out all the holes in the schema by scripture and logic.
It is not possible to dialogue with what is essentially illogical, even of you pull scripture to make it sound Biblical
As @cv5 has pointed out many times,
God doesn’t program people’s decisions like robots
He wants people to Love Him/Seek Him by their own decision – without making that decision for them.
He/God proposes marriage to her – and honors her decision – and does not make her decision for her.
He/God allows her to say no – and does not determine her choice.
What I see in this Reformed School is the case of the irresistible bull of Greek mythology.
Too funny, as if God does not know those whose hearts are uncircumcised cannot love Him. Try reading Deuteronomy 30:6, Ezekiel 11:19, and this also: I will give them one heart and one way, so that they will always fear Me for their own good and for the good of their children after them. I will make an everlasting covenant with them: I will never turn away from doing good to them, and I will put My fear in their hearts, so that they will never turn away from Me. Yes, I will rejoice in doing them good.God doesn’t program people’s decisions like robots
He wants people to Love Him/Seek Him by their own decision – without making that decision for them.
Do you not make a distinction between the improperly translated word "hell" and the Lake of Fire?Is that destruction "hell" ... probably not.
So, more ignoring the questions that I am interested in, and more blather and pontificating. This is why having the discussion is impossible.
Grace and peace.
You have zero verses articulating free will of the natural man. Stop lying.Why would I discuss a doctrine most people are realizing on a daily basis is outside scripture, the right thing to do is show its errors.
I don't need to know God's purpose to know that when He sends forth His word that it will always accomplish what He purposes. His
word clearly says that it does. My question to you is...when God sends forth His word, is the purpose always to accomplish salvation?
What you are actually doing is refusing to acknowledge scripture. I didn't address you with my views. I gave scripture and asked questions. Rather than stay on point and explore the implications of scripture, you go off point and spout things that aren't germane to the passage. And that because you aren't actually interested in truth, but hanging on to your current beliefs. Anything that might actually show error in your thinking requires a change of subject and a general denunciation of the other view. It's your modus operandi, and that of many here.Why would I discuss a doctrine most people are realizing on a daily basis is outside scripture, the right thing to do is show its errors.
Have you ever objected to God choosing Israel to the neglect of every other nation? Do you object to God sovereignly passing over every other nation?Just to be clear what Reformed Doctrine teaches...
The doctrine of reprobation, in Christian theology, particularly within Reformed theology, refers to God's eternal, unconditional decision to pass over certain individuals and not grant them salvation, instead leaving them to experience the consequences of their sin. It's the negative counterpart to the doctrine of election, where God chooses some for salvation.
Essentially, reprobation means God does not choose to save some individuals, not because of any inherent fault in them, but because of his sovereign will.
Gemini/
Have you ever objected to God choosing Israel to the neglect of every other nation? Do you object to God sovereignly passing over every other nation?
Choosing Israel? Right. To do what exactly?Have you ever objected to God choosing Israel to the neglect of every other nation? Do you object to God sovereignly passing over every other nation?
That's interesting. What other nation does the Bible refer to as God's people? In Deuteronomy 7:6-8, God says He chose Israel. Do you find in scripture God doing so for another nation?He didn't.
So...God did choose Israel? @HeIsHere is incorrect? Did God choose any other nation? Did God force Israel to be His people?Choosing Israel? Right. To do what exactly?
Do you know? I doubt it.
With a Determinist foundation of course.
So...God did choose Israel? @HeIsHere is incorrect? Did God choose any other nation? Did God force Israel to be His people?
Choosing Israel? Right. To do what exactly?So...God did choose Israel? @HeIsHere is incorrect? Did God choose any other nation? Did God force Israel to be His people?
and who is given to God?
is it not those who see and believe?
do he himself say those who do have PASSED from death to life (bron again or regeneration)
and that they shall not be judged?
John 5: 24 “Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life.