That would make salvation no longer of grace. He simply chose to have a people for Himself.
Have you found the success criteria yet?
That would make salvation no longer of grace. He simply chose to have a people for Himself.
So...tell us some of your experiences of God.you forgot the emoji, lol
So...tell us some of your experiences of God.
She doesn't have any, remember?So...tell us some of your experiences of God.
A few things: First, would that be the same "grace" that freed the vast majority of the world to choose to reject the gospel?
She doesn't have any, remember?
There is no criteria on the human side. That's what makes it grace.Have you found the success criteria yet?
Keep trying to deflect and make it about me, oh well, was fun til next time.
Each person does not include you? I guess not. Just more of your dishonesty.Fixed it for you, unless you can prove (which you cannot) he had specific criteria explicitly stated for each person.
You're not a very good apologist for FWT, are you? Why can't you answer my questions?
It's not about any of us. It's about God and His glory.Keep trying to deflect and make it about me, oh well, was fun til next time.
There is no criteria on the human side. That's what makes it grace.
From God's side, He simply chose people to set His affection upon.
Belief is the result of the activity of God: the Spirit of God employing the word of God. It too is of grace. Nothing arbitrary about the work of God.Biblically, there is a condition on the human side, belief which precedes receiving the gift of salvation.
But according to your second statement it is arbitrary.
Isn't that what I initially stated.![]()
Yes, you lied about what Scripture states. Repeatedly. And then project your lack of understanding onto Cameron.Biblically, there is a condition on the human side, belief which precedes receiving the gift of salvation.
But according to your second statement it is arbitrary.
Isn't that what I initially stated.![]()
Here's the link to the gotquestions article:Sometimes they (gotquestions) are fine for sure, I would have to go back and read the dialogue to say more.
No, not really.You have the *free will* choice to lie about me or not. So far you've chosen the former.
Sooooo.....pre-birth lottery?Yes, you lied about what Scripture states. Repeatedly. And then project your lack of understanding onto Cameron.
You really ought to make a bit more of an effort to understand Scripture. And God.
As it is, claiming God does things arbitrarily just showcases your ignorance.
PS And in Him, having heard and believed the word of truth— the gospel of your salvation— you were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, 14who is the pledge of our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession, to the praise of His glory.
There you go again with the strawman. You don't even care when you do it. It's called "bearing false witness against your neighbor." I'm sure you can look that one up.
Are you suggesting that dogma is sinful? Are there no definite, absolute tenets or body of doctrines for the Church to grasp and hold onto? What about dogmas like the Trinity, the Incarnation, virgin birth, the fall of mankind, etc.?
So you aren't doing to stop lying. No point in continuing then. Have a nice day.No, not really.
[Mat 16:22-23 KJV] 22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.
23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
We make choices all the time based on our desires. My decision was not "coerced", but it was only made after I was made spiritually alive. While I was spiritually dead, I had no desire to believe in Christ.