Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Grace is not making people believe, it is restraining the sin nature so you are free to accept or reject His truth. His grace does the same thing after salvation. You are not made to believe the truth, you must believe of your own free will. We would all be thinking exactly the same thing if God is making us believe. Why you can't see that I don't know unless you think we who disagree with you are not saved. That could be the only reason I can think of as to why you could explain disagreements among Christians.
So many logical fallacies, too little time.

 
oh my ... a thousand pardons for mentioning "birth of" ... smh

Mathew 2:2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east, and are come to worship him.

Whose star? ... His star ... so, yes, Messiah is revealed in the natural creation.

.
False, nothing about the messiah being revealed in the stars. Those guys are probably from the east maybe Babylon. Babylon back in the day had prophets among them like Daniel. More in likely he prophesied about the coming messiah as in Daniel 9 and so these men had a Spiritual knowledge via the scripture. Now God may have confirmed their knowledge of the expected messiah king with the star and led them to him. But it had nothing to do with natural creation revealing Christ, that is hogwash.
 
sawdust said:


If God is doing what He asks us to do, why is He asking us to do it?

For the same reason God required the Israelites to seize the Land and drive out their enemies -- yet everywhere in scripture God is given 100% of the credit for all Israel's victories. You, too, appear to have no understanding of the Mystical Union of Christ with His Body.
 
The star was part of natural creation? Where is it today?
consensus is that the "star" was actually a conjunction ... in fact a triple conjunction within a short period of time ... between Jupiter (king planet) and Regulus (king star) in the constellation Leo (the lion). After the triple conjunction between Jupiter and Regulus, there was another conjunction between Jupiter and Venus (mother planet).


Genesis 49:9-10 Judah is a lion's whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up? The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

.
 
You are so duped. It is you who are doing that....

The Lord has nothing to prove.
He simply reveals the truth.

And, you believe that those standing opposed to your errors are doing just what you do?

That, in effect? You judge yourself.

Your own words will be held against you.

He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours,
but also for the sins of the whole world. 1 John 2:2​

I thought you said you are a believer in what the Word says?

You're lying, and promoting a lie.

Here's YOU!


lalala-i-can-t-hear-you-dtddhpd96258gse2.gif

No! That is you. I have provided NUMEROUS scriptures that prove that neither God never intended for his covenant people to assimilate with the pagan nations and all God-fearing Jews understood that perfectly. The Jews never considered themselves to be part of the world. They considered themselves to be a consecrated people -- SEPARATE from the rest of the nations. As interpreters of the Word on this side of the Cross, it's incumbent upon us to understand scripture in the same way the writers and their original audiences understood it.

And besides that...you interpret 1Jn 2:2 out of context because you're lumping John's audience in with the world (Gentiles), even though the apostle himself in the passage makes a distinction between Jews and the World (Gentile nations). The passage does not say that God made propitiation for "OUR| sins and for the sins of the rest of the world". That little "but" in the passage makes the distinction between the two groups.
 
consensus is that the "star" was actually a conjunction ... in fact a triple conjunction within a short period of time ... between Jupiter (king planet) and Regulus (king star) in the constellation Leo (the lion). After the triple conjunction between Jupiter and Regulus, there was another conjunction between Jupiter and Venus (mother planet).


Genesis 49:9-10 Judah is a lion's whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up? The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

.

Is that bright star still around today leading people to the Messiah? Or was it a one-time, unique event?
 
reneweddaybyday said:
nope ... directly refutes your claim that "Christ is not revealed by the natural creation". That you do not want to acknowledge the truth does not equal my showing you the truth is a "rabbit trail".​
Mathew 2:2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east, and are come to worship him.

Wasn't it scripture that revealed the existence of star?
The men from the east told Herod they had seen His star:

Mathew 2:2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east, and are come to worship him.

they didn't say they read about it in Scripture.

.
 
@sawdust

Grace is not making people believe

False Grace is causative of people believing Acts 18:27

27 And when he was disposed to pass into Achaia, the brethren wrote, exhorting the disciples to receive him: who, when he was come, helped them much which had believed through grace:

The word through is the prep dia and means

of means

by

by the means of

through

the ground or reason by which something is or is not done

by reason of

on account of

because of for this reason

therefore

on this account


So Grace is the cause of believing, that is God's power
 
reneweddaybyday said:
nope ... directly refutes your claim that "Christ is not revealed by the natural creation". That you do not want to acknowledge the truth does not equal my showing you the truth is a "rabbit trail".​
Mathew 2:2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east, and are come to worship him.


The men from the east told Herod they had seen His star:

Mathew 2:2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east, and are come to worship him.

they didn't say they read about it in Scripture.

.
How they know it was his star specifically? Did the star tell them he was to be born king of the Jews and to worship him?
 
reneweddaybyday said:
nope ... directly refutes your claim that "Christ is not revealed by the natural creation". That you do not want to acknowledge the truth does not equal my showing you the truth is a "rabbit trail".​
Mathew 2:2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east, and are come to worship him.


The men from the east told Herod they had seen His star:

Mathew 2:2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east, and are come to worship him.

they didn't say they read about it in Scripture.

.
So I guess the stars now reveal Christ and him crucified? Man just don't need to suppress it! Outstanding
 
consensus is that the "star" was actually a conjunction ... in fact a triple conjunction within a short period of time ... between Jupiter (king planet) and Regulus (king star) in the constellation Leo (the lion). After the triple conjunction between Jupiter and Regulus, there was another conjunction between Jupiter and Venus (mother planet).


Genesis 49:9-10 Judah is a lion's whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up? The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

.
That's conjecture. It's simply what you have chosen to believe. You wrap it with consensus to make it more palatable.
 
reneweddaybyday said:
nope ... directly refutes your claim that "Christ is not revealed by the natural creation". That you do not want to acknowledge the truth does not equal my showing you the truth is a "rabbit trail".​
Mathew 2:2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east, and are come to worship him.


The men from the east told Herod they had seen His star:

Mathew 2:2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east, and are come to worship him.

they didn't say they read about it in Scripture.

.
Yes, but why were they looking for a star?
 
So many professing Christians say it because of their PRIDE -- Pride which is the root cause of all sin. Is it any wonder that they hate all those many scriptures that teach us that God gives his grace only to the Humble!?

Your so called plan of salvation has no conditions remember... "god" creates those he had planned to save based on ???? :unsure: .... and everyone else is shut out.
 
Mz. Sawdust, I have a question for you over something you conceded yesterday. When discussing Jn 3:16-17, I pointed out the glaring inconsistency you FWers bring to this passage. In v. 16, "kosmos" (world) you FWers insist that this term must be understood in the distributive sense; but then in v. 17 the same Gr. term cannot be understood distributively because, according to you, the phrase in v. 16 that reads "whosoever believes" qualifies (limits) the extent of Christ's salvation. God loves all w/o exception (v. 16), but Christ did not come to save all w/o exception (v.17), even though the passage says differently.

Now that you have shoved your foot in that door and concede that the term "world" in v.17 isn't always used in the distributive sense, can you point us to other passages where this term is also used in qualified sense? For example, is "world" in any of the passages below used in the distributive sense or qualified sense?

1 Kings 10:24
24 The whole world sought audience with Solomon to hear the wisdom God had put in his heart.

NIV

Or

John 17:9
9 I pray for them. I am not praying for the world, but for those you have given me, for they are yours.

NIV

Or

Rom 11:11-15
11 Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their [Israel's] transgression, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel envious. 12 But if their [Israel's] transgression means riches for the world, and their [Israel's] loss means riches for the Gentiles, how much greater riches will their fullness bring!

13 I am talking to you Gentiles. Inasmuch as I am the apostle to the Gentiles, I make much of my ministry 14 in the hope that I may somehow arouse my own people to envy and save some of them. 15 For if their [Israel's] rejection is the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead?

NIV
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cameron143