.
The incident with Cain and his brother isn't about the so-called plan of
salvation. It's about fellowship; which is a different issue altogether.
See Isa 1:2-15, Prov 15:8, and 1John 1:5-6.
_
So you were not thinking total depravity there?
.
The incident with Cain and his brother isn't about the so-called plan of
salvation. It's about fellowship; which is a different issue altogether.
See Isa 1:2-15, Prov 15:8, and 1John 1:5-6.
_
Not sure this is based on scripture? It sounds like a mixture of scriptures without correct interpretation. Let me ask you what this scripture means to you, using your ideology.
Hebrews 12:14-17 Work at living in peace with everyone, and work at living a holy life, for those who are not holy will not see the Lord. Look after each other so that none of you fails to receive the grace of God. Watch out that no poisonous root of bitterness grows up to trouble you, corrupting many. Make sure that no one is immoral or godless like Esau, who traded his birthright as the firstborn son for a single meal. You know that afterward, when he wanted his father’s blessing, he was rejected. It was too late for repentance, even though he begged with bitter tears.
.
The incident with Cain and his brother isn't about the so-called plan of
salvation. It's about fellowship; which is a different issue altogether.
See Isa 1:2-15, Prov 15:8, and 1John 1:5-6.
_
Is it? You quoted from Hebrews. Seems like a weird way to avoid answering the question. How about you show where in scripture suggests James and Hebrews is for tribulation period. But nice try Guojing lol you always avoid questions that contradict your ideology.The doctrine for Hebrews, as James, is meant for the Tribulation period, although we can learn lessons from it now.
So you were not thinking total depravity there?
You are trying to say you believe that had Cain repented after Genesis 4:7
and offer a blood sacrifice like Abel, God would still have rejected
him?
Is it? You quoted from Hebrews. Seems like a weird way to avoid answering the question. How about you show where in scripture suggests James and Hebrews is for tribulation period. But nice try Guojing lol you always avoid questions that contradict your ideology.
.
I have yet to be shown irrefutable evidence that Abel's offering was slain. Please
see post No.50 for my take on this incident in the Old Testament.
_
There was no command to bring an offering of the ground, there was a precedence set by God killing the animal, shedding blood and covering Adam and Eve's shame, sin and nakedness and the PROMISE of a redeemer in Genesis 3:15......from front to back the bible points at Jesus as the sacrifice for sin.....
There are many verses from Paul's epistles you can use to show:
- "BUT NOW the righteousness of God without the law is manifested" (Rom. 3:21);
- "To him that worketh not, but believeth on Him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness" (Rom. 4:5);
- "Being Justified freely by His grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus" (Rom. 3:24);
- "In whom we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins according to the riches of His grace" (Eph. 1:7);
- "Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us" (Tit. 3:5);
- "Not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast" (Eph. 2:8,9) -
Btw, I never used Hebrews earlier, it was posthuman.
I have yet to be shown irrefutable evidence that Abel's offering was slain.
When you made the claim that
God has never been pleased with the offerings of unrighteous people even
when their offerings are 100% correct, timely, and God-given.
You are trying to say you believe that had Cain repented after Genesis 4:7 and offer a blood sacrifice like Abel, God would still have rejected him?
.
The incident with Cain and his brother isn't about the so-called plan of
salvation. It's about fellowship; which is a different issue altogether.
See Isa 1:2-15, Prov 15:8, and 1John 1:5-6.
_
Under the law later given were people permitted to purchase an animal for price and offer it? Could Cain have traded, purchased or raised one himself?so Cain was in a sense dependent on Abel, because Abel was the one who tended sheep
Under the law later given were people permitted to purchase an animal for price and offer it? Could Cain have traded, purchased or raised one himself?
What was it that CAIN lacked faith in?
He knew God, was offering to God, talked with God.....so what was shown by his offering? A lack of faith INTO what exactly?
And I will remind you he was 1st on the list in Jude that false teachers are compared to...WHY? And what what he portraying that was FALSE?
so Cain was in a sense dependent on Abel, because Abel was the one who tended sheep
if they are commemorating the lamb(s?) slain to make covering for their parents, and Abel by repeating what God had done shows faith, and Cain by his particular botanical offering is demonstrating the opposite, what is the antithesis in Genesis 3 of the coverings of skin?
figs. how many things did Christ curse while He tabernacled among us?
what/who ever died in His presence?
so Cain was in a sense dependent on Abel, because Abel was the one who
tended sheep
And Abel also himself brought of the firstfruits of his sheep, and of the fat of
them (Genesis 4:4)
how do you get the fat out of an animal without killing it?