LOLOL , That's what wouldn't meet the criteria .. But I know of a bunch that think so
LOLOL , That's what wouldn't meet the criteria .. But I know of a bunch that think so
Ha , no I'm saying the bride accepts or rejects willingly .. Are you saying it's not their/our choice ?
All I did was be willing to change believe, confess and repent ..I'm saying God changes the nature of the person through regeneration (being born again), and this produces the fruit of faith and repentance.
God removes the stony heart, giving them a heart of flesh (the new nature) and this heart produces the fruit of faith and repentance.
The other view is decisional regeneration..that you need to produce faith and repentance from a stony heart, in order to receive a heart of flesh.
That is the dominant view that has been taught by evangelicals since the church was overwhelmed by free-willers. And, this is a result of Charles Finney and others like him, that focus on decisional regeneration.
Do I believe their is a "choice"? Yes..and the man with a heart of stone always chooses to reject God and embrace a life of sin. The man with the heart of flesh, given to him by God, always chooses to embrace God and reject his life of sin.
It is God who gives the heart of flesh to those he is saving.
All I did was be willing to change believe, confess and repent ..
This applies to all of us. None of us are born being "Born Again". It is a choice we all must make. This rules out the idea that some are born predestined to go to Heaven. Choosing to be born again and following Jesus is the only way. There is no special group of people that was born elected, and there is no special group of people that was born without the opportunity to come to Jesus. This why Jesus told His followers to go out and tell everyone.
Matthew 22
22:1 And Jesus answered and spake unto them again by parables, and said,
22:2 The kingdom of heaven is like unto a certain king, which made a marriage for his son,
22:3 And sent forth his servants to call them that were bidden to the wedding: and they would not come.
22:4 Again, he sent forth other servants, saying, Tell them which are bidden, Behold, I have prepared my dinner: my oxen and [my] fatlings [are] killed, and all things [are] ready: come unto the marriage.
22:5 But they made light of [it], and went their ways, one to his farm, another to his merchandise:
22:6 And the remnant took his servants, and entreated [them] spitefully, and slew [them].
22:7 But when the king heard [thereof], he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city.
22:8 Then saith he to his servants, The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy.
22:9 Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage.
22:10 So those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests.
It should be noted that there are many false teachers everywhere who try to trick people into believing falsehood and lies. The Bible told us that it would be this way. Do not be deceived or discouraged, my brothers.
I think you got it backwards and you feel some reason to deny it ....God made you willing by giving you a heart of flesh. That produced faith and repentance.
Free willers have it backwards.
By the way, I'm guessing 80 percent of the people on this site are free-willers. Many of the Reformed people have been run off.
I think you got it backwards and you feel some reason to deny it ....
9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
This applies to all of us. None of us are born being "Born Again". It is a choice we all must make. This rules out the idea that some are born predestined to go to Heaven. Choosing to be born again and following Jesus is the only way. There is no special group of people that was born elected, and there is no special group of people that was born without the opportunity to come to Jesus. This why Jesus told His followers to go out and tell everyone.
Matthew 22
22:1 And Jesus answered and spake unto them again by parables, and said,
22:2 The kingdom of heaven is like unto a certain king, which made a marriage for his son,
22:3 And sent forth his servants to call them that were bidden to the wedding: and they would not come.
22:4 Again, he sent forth other servants, saying, Tell them which are bidden, Behold, I have prepared my dinner: my oxen and [my] fatlings [are] killed, and all things [are] ready: come unto the marriage.
22:5 But they made light of [it], and went their ways, one to his farm, another to his merchandise:
22:6 And the remnant took his servants, and entreated [them] spitefully, and slew [them].
22:7 But when the king heard [thereof], he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city.
22:8 Then saith he to his servants, The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy.
22:9 Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage.
22:10 So those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests.
It should be noted that there are many false teachers everywhere who try to trick people into believing falsehood and lies. The Bible told us that it would be this way. Do not be deceived or discouraged, my brothers.
I’m not sure I agree with you completely sir, there are too many verses that explain predestination.
And none of them are about salvation, but being predestined for the future adoption. The people are already saved.
Same old tired arguments about those seeking to deny God his sovereignty.
I am not sure if you are talking about corporate election, but that is Karl Barth's doctrine. He spent the last years of his life living with his wife and secretary, being intimately involved with both. The love letters have been recently published, and I don't see a saved man involved in such activities. Besides that, he denied the inerrancy of Scripture and claimed it had contradictions.
But, regarding whether God elects people to salvation, it is apparent that he does, and the argument that election is only a corporate election or election to service is an error.
Here is an example, where God says that he chose specific individuals with few redeeming characteristics for salvation:
1 Corinthians 1:26-31
26 For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. 27 But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; 28 God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, 29 so that no human being might boast in the presence of God. 30 And because of him you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, righteousness and sanctification and redemption, 31 so that, as it is written, “Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.”
(ESV)
Why did he choose these individuals, with characteristics that were not admirable? To make his glory more apparent. He is like the star athlete who picks the worst players for his team, so that his glory can be displayed more apparently. He does not tolerate boasting.
Note that they are chosen to be in Christ, and that this includes righteousness, sanctification and redemption..SALVATION WORDS.
I don't know how it can be any more apparent, yet the same guys on this site keep claiming the same stuff.
Same old tired arguments about those seeking to deny God his sovereignty.
I am not sure if you are talking about corporate election, but that is Karl Barth's doctrine. He spent the last years of his life living with his wife and secretary, being intimately involved with both. The love letters have been recently published, and I don't see a saved man involved in such activities. Besides that, he denied the inerrancy of Scripture and claimed it had contradictions.
But, regarding whether God elects people to salvation, it is apparent that he does, and the argument that election is only a corporate election or election to service is an error.
Here is an example, where God says that he chose specific individuals with few redeeming characteristics for salvation:
1 Corinthians 1:26-31
26 For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. 27 But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; 28 God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, 29 so that no human being might boast in the presence of God. 30 And because of him you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, righteousness and sanctification and redemption, 31 so that, as it is written, “Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.”
(ESV)
Why did he choose these individuals, with characteristics that were not admirable? To make his glory more apparent. He is like the star athlete who picks the worst players for his team, so that his glory can be displayed more apparently. He does not tolerate boasting.
Note that they are chosen to be in Christ, and that this includes righteousness, sanctification and redemption..SALVATION WORDS.
I don't know how it can be any more apparent, yet the same guys on this site keep claiming the same stuff.
Some folks aren't willing to give up their riches , their freewill choice .. Riches come in many different forms imo ..Same old tired arguments about those seeking to deny God his sovereignty.
I am not sure if you are talking about corporate election, but that is Karl Barth's doctrine. He spent the last years of his life living with his wife and secretary, being intimately involved with both. The love letters have been recently published, and I don't see a saved man involved in such activities. Besides that, he denied the inerrancy of Scripture and claimed it had contradictions.
But, regarding whether God elects people to salvation, it is apparent that he does, and the argument that election is only a corporate election or election to service is an error.
Here is an example, where God says that he chose specific individuals with few redeeming characteristics for salvation:
1 Corinthians 1:26-31
26 For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. 27 But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; 28 God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, 29 so that no human being might boast in the presence of God. 30 And because of him you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, righteousness and sanctification and redemption, 31 so that, as it is written, “Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.”
(ESV)
Why did he choose these individuals, with characteristics that were not admirable? To make his glory more apparent. He is like the star athlete who picks the worst players for his team, so that his glory can be displayed more apparently. He does not tolerate boasting.
Note that they are chosen to be in Christ, and that this includes righteousness, sanctification and redemption..SALVATION WORDS.
I don't know how it can be any more apparent, yet the same guys on this site keep claiming the same stuff.
You just nailed in the head sir! He has to put a passage of verses and let's talk about it. Not just a mere opinion just for nothing.If you want to talk predestination, at least post the verses that has the word in it.
I don't mean to be contrary and I agree that baptism in itself does not save but it DOES seem like water baptism is a pretty big deal in the New Testament.
I don't think we can discount the possibility of being born of water DOES refer to water baptism.
But I DO agree with you just because the bible states water it is not necessarily referring to baptism.
I think if we look at water baptism the way John was using it, as a source of repentance, or trying to be right before God, instead of some magic ritual that will impart Righteousness to someone it would be easier to accept and understand.
The way I have looked at water baptism is a public declaration for Christ. Sort of like saying I am making a proclamation for Christ. I believe and I want everyone (my peers?) to know that. I state this publicly in hopes of the Lord Jesus stating it privately before the Father.
God is not willing that any 9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance ..There's nothing that conflicts with my position there.
It says "to us-ward", and is talking about those the letter is addressed to, who are believers.
This is talking about those who the letter is addressed to, which are the elect believers in the church who have already obtained salvation.
So, he wants all the believers to come to repentance, and that might even include current believers who are dwelling in sin and need to be conformed to the image of Jesus before their death.
Repentance is not a one-time thing. Additionally, even if it were, there could be individuals within the congregation which had not been regenerated yet.
One thing is sure, though, the Bible teaches that election is a true doctrine. It also teaches that the believer needs to be born-again, and he doesn't cause his own birth anymore than a child causes their own birth. This idea is absurd.
My New Birth came when I realized all the millions of folks could not be that wrong that came and willing to die for Jesus sake, that the witness and testimony of others before me must have something I didn't .. I listened and made a choice for Jesus one day .... And how many folks go to hell because we refuse to witness Jesus to them ..Please don’t turn this into an election debate, the title is New Birth let’s stick to that please. New birth is an amazing gift, we should rejoice.
My New Birth came when I realized all the millions of folks could not be that wrong that came and willing to die for Jesus sake, that the witness and testimony of others before me must have something I didn't .. I listened and made a choice for Jesus one day .... And how many folks go to hell because we refuse to witness Jesus to them ..