If someone doesn't believe or doesn't repent and isn't forgiven, why would that have to be 'reconciled' with the idea that speaking against the Holy Spirit cannot be forgiven?
People can commit forgivable sins, but not repent and believe and be forgiven. But other people who commit the same sins repent and believe and are forgiven. That doesn't have to be the same category as villifying the Holy Spirit. These words actually have meaning.
I could insist that blasphemy means 'eating chocolate on the weekend.' The problem is, that has nothing to do with what 'blasphemy' means.
People can commit forgivable sins, but not repent and believe and be forgiven. But other people who commit the same sins repent and believe and are forgiven. That doesn't have to be the same category as villifying the Holy Spirit. These words actually have meaning.
I could insist that blasphemy means 'eating chocolate on the weekend.' The problem is, that has nothing to do with what 'blasphemy' means.