Behold the Beast System
- Thread starter ZNP
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
easier to wipe out the excess people with a poisonous vaccine than build more bots?
When the children grow and begin to see and speak out about the thing they began to understand the beast will conscript their sons and daughters and send them off to die by the millions and vaccines and bots will then be seen as toy's given to the children to play with so that their minds were hindered from understanding.
I'll explain it more basic for you then. When any of you do understand the issues of the beast and his workings and name and can identify it, when you begin to speak publicly of it the internet along with AI will end. When all our computer and phone screens turn black you will surly know it has been understood and spoken. Then millions upon millions will march off to a seemingly endless war in an attempt to stop it's voice from spreading out. The internet has nothing to do with your benefit it's only to evaluate what you have figured out and AI narrows it down in milliseconds on a global scale. Everyone's safe from the beast until one of us figures him out.
People are using really bad analogies for AI. It is nothing like a calculator. AI is part of the technological revolution just as electricity, computers, satellites, the internet and even calculators are.
If you are building a house, AI is when you turn the power on.
Also this whole ASI and AGI is a distraction. With every job that AI can do that is one less job you want a human to do. Anything that is electrical can be operated by AI. Things that are not electrical can still be operated by the beast system with robots. A few years ago robots didn't look anything like humans, they were designed to do one specific job and they did it. The only reason they are making humanoid robots is to do all the jobs that humans can do.
A better analogy to AI is "the beast system" which is the culmination of the Technological revolution. Prior to the industrial revolution we had horses everywhere, they were almost all replaced with cars, trucks and trains. However, the industrial revolution did not replace the driver, only the vehicle. The technological revolution is replacing the driver. Now a car and driver will be replaced with a self driving car, or self driving truck.
We saw this transition take place the fastest in cities and the same will be true with AI taking jobs, it will take place the fastest in companies with more than 100 employees. Walmart can replace half their cashiers with self checkout machines. But a Mom and Pop store won't replace anyone. Olive Garden can replace waiters and waitresses with little computer kiosks, but you won't see that at a family owned Italian restaurant. McDonald's can fully automate their restaurant replacing everyone, but a local Diner won't do that.
A better analogy would be the cotton gin, it replaced 100 slaves on a plantation, but the homes that had one slave helping out in the field with the owner, he wasn't replaced, not immediately. Employees are modern day slaves and the big companies, like the big plantations will find it easiest to lay them off in mass. Simply do a cost benefit analysis.
This doesn't mean that all horses will be killed, we still have horses. All of their jobs have been taken except for giving rich people an animal they can play Polo with or bet on.
If you are building a house, AI is when you turn the power on.
Also this whole ASI and AGI is a distraction. With every job that AI can do that is one less job you want a human to do. Anything that is electrical can be operated by AI. Things that are not electrical can still be operated by the beast system with robots. A few years ago robots didn't look anything like humans, they were designed to do one specific job and they did it. The only reason they are making humanoid robots is to do all the jobs that humans can do.
A better analogy to AI is "the beast system" which is the culmination of the Technological revolution. Prior to the industrial revolution we had horses everywhere, they were almost all replaced with cars, trucks and trains. However, the industrial revolution did not replace the driver, only the vehicle. The technological revolution is replacing the driver. Now a car and driver will be replaced with a self driving car, or self driving truck.
We saw this transition take place the fastest in cities and the same will be true with AI taking jobs, it will take place the fastest in companies with more than 100 employees. Walmart can replace half their cashiers with self checkout machines. But a Mom and Pop store won't replace anyone. Olive Garden can replace waiters and waitresses with little computer kiosks, but you won't see that at a family owned Italian restaurant. McDonald's can fully automate their restaurant replacing everyone, but a local Diner won't do that.
A better analogy would be the cotton gin, it replaced 100 slaves on a plantation, but the homes that had one slave helping out in the field with the owner, he wasn't replaced, not immediately. Employees are modern day slaves and the big companies, like the big plantations will find it easiest to lay them off in mass. Simply do a cost benefit analysis.
This doesn't mean that all horses will be killed, we still have horses. All of their jobs have been taken except for giving rich people an animal they can play Polo with or bet on.
We Found the Hidden Cost of Data Centers. It's in Your Electric Bill
What a great story of the American people stepping up to help the struggling billionaires (META, GROK, Google, etc) and they didn't even know that they had been given the bill.
There are claims that only 5 jobs will remain in 2030 that will not be taken by AI and robots.
This is because they require empathy and compassion.
1. Healthcare workers
2. Education
3. Creative arts
4. Strategic management
5. Human/AI collaboration.
The problem with this is that in all five cases even though AI cannot replace 100%, it can do 50% of the work of any of these jobs. When I was teaching I had 150 students, but with AI I could easily handle 300 students. Teachers have five classes a day because there is a lot of prep and grading that is also required. If AI can do all that you could easily have 8 classes a day. Teachers get about 3 months vacation a year when all the days are added up. But if you don't need to do many hours of homework each week there is no reason you couldn't work 50 weeks a year like everyone else.
This is true of all of these categories. No, AI cannot replace you 100% but it can replace 50% of what you do and because of that there will be no reason to hire anyone out of college. New hires make up less than 5% of the workforce. If AI can make workers do 50% more not only will they stop hiring new workers but they will also lay off a third of the workers.
These five categories represent less than 20% of US workers. So does this mean that 80% of jobs will be gone by 2030? And of the remaining 20% no one will be hired, and probably a third of those will be laid off.
This is because they require empathy and compassion.
1. Healthcare workers
2. Education
3. Creative arts
4. Strategic management
5. Human/AI collaboration.
The problem with this is that in all five cases even though AI cannot replace 100%, it can do 50% of the work of any of these jobs. When I was teaching I had 150 students, but with AI I could easily handle 300 students. Teachers have five classes a day because there is a lot of prep and grading that is also required. If AI can do all that you could easily have 8 classes a day. Teachers get about 3 months vacation a year when all the days are added up. But if you don't need to do many hours of homework each week there is no reason you couldn't work 50 weeks a year like everyone else.
This is true of all of these categories. No, AI cannot replace you 100% but it can replace 50% of what you do and because of that there will be no reason to hire anyone out of college. New hires make up less than 5% of the workforce. If AI can make workers do 50% more not only will they stop hiring new workers but they will also lay off a third of the workers.
These five categories represent less than 20% of US workers. So does this mean that 80% of jobs will be gone by 2030? And of the remaining 20% no one will be hired, and probably a third of those will be laid off.
People make a big mistake about AI thinking the key point of no return is when AI is smarter than the smartest human.
First, if you hire an employee are you looking for someone who is super smart or are you looking for someone who can follow directions? There are probably a handful of people who are hired because they are "super smart" but for 90-95% of people hired the real question is can you follow directions. AI can follow directions very well.
Second, let's think of a person who is super smart, perhaps a lawyer, or Columbo, or Sheldon Cooper. That lawyer who will get the guy off who everyone assumes is guilty, he has a team of people working with him. He has the ideas, but they go and do the research he asks for, gets him the things he needs. He might have a team of ten people working with him when you include private investigators, para legals, and junior attorneys. AI can replace 50-80% of those people.
Third, the improvement in the last ten years has been at break neck speed. Ten years ago, in 2015 AI was in an infant stage. It could play chess, a game with very clear rules. In 2002 we had the first Roomba vacuum cleaner and it was clear, it wasn't going to put any cleaning lady out of business. In 2011 Watson won at Jeopardy and for the first time it became clear, AI would be able to replace many workers, not yet, but soon. In 2017 AI taught itself to beat the world's number 1 Go player, it created new strategies never before seen. That was the point at which we realized AI could train itself to be smarter than humans. Again, Go is a game with very clear rules defined, but it was a signpost that AI was not hype, then in 2020 Alphafold was released solving real world problems that had stumped humans for fifty years. This was a key transition, showing that AI could have super intelligence and that it could be used to solve very significant problems.
At the same time GPT-3 was released and has been used by kids in school to do their school work. Since we have had readily available free versions of AI on the internet millions of people have used them and they have improved dramatically. At first they were likened to a very smart elementary school kid, then a very smart HS kid, then a very smart college kid, and now they are testing at the very top scores for graduate students and Phd's. Depending on your definition in many ways AI has achieved Artificial General Intelligence meaning they have a firm grasp on all the various disciplines in education. Although we still have humans that can outperform the AI on individual tests it is unlikely there is any human that could outperform AI on all the tests and what is much more likely is that given ten tests AI will outperform every single human on at least six. This improvement has taken place in the last five or six years. You could argue this was "born" at the time of Watson in 2011, but that makes AI 14 years old. Also we know that AI can improve with more powerful computers, with more data, with better chips and with better software. Every single year we are seeing improvements in these four areas. The pace of improvement is astounding. If you are starting college this year where will AI be in four years when you graduate? Far ahead of you, that is for sure. If you decide to stay in college for two more years to get a Phd, then where will AI be six years from now? At this point if you are not scoring in the top 1% of humans is it worth it to go to college for the next six years? Obviously it depends on several factors, is the cost of education a factor to you? If not and if your father owns the business and if you are scoring in the top 1% of kids it might be.
First, if you hire an employee are you looking for someone who is super smart or are you looking for someone who can follow directions? There are probably a handful of people who are hired because they are "super smart" but for 90-95% of people hired the real question is can you follow directions. AI can follow directions very well.
Second, let's think of a person who is super smart, perhaps a lawyer, or Columbo, or Sheldon Cooper. That lawyer who will get the guy off who everyone assumes is guilty, he has a team of people working with him. He has the ideas, but they go and do the research he asks for, gets him the things he needs. He might have a team of ten people working with him when you include private investigators, para legals, and junior attorneys. AI can replace 50-80% of those people.
Third, the improvement in the last ten years has been at break neck speed. Ten years ago, in 2015 AI was in an infant stage. It could play chess, a game with very clear rules. In 2002 we had the first Roomba vacuum cleaner and it was clear, it wasn't going to put any cleaning lady out of business. In 2011 Watson won at Jeopardy and for the first time it became clear, AI would be able to replace many workers, not yet, but soon. In 2017 AI taught itself to beat the world's number 1 Go player, it created new strategies never before seen. That was the point at which we realized AI could train itself to be smarter than humans. Again, Go is a game with very clear rules defined, but it was a signpost that AI was not hype, then in 2020 Alphafold was released solving real world problems that had stumped humans for fifty years. This was a key transition, showing that AI could have super intelligence and that it could be used to solve very significant problems.
At the same time GPT-3 was released and has been used by kids in school to do their school work. Since we have had readily available free versions of AI on the internet millions of people have used them and they have improved dramatically. At first they were likened to a very smart elementary school kid, then a very smart HS kid, then a very smart college kid, and now they are testing at the very top scores for graduate students and Phd's. Depending on your definition in many ways AI has achieved Artificial General Intelligence meaning they have a firm grasp on all the various disciplines in education. Although we still have humans that can outperform the AI on individual tests it is unlikely there is any human that could outperform AI on all the tests and what is much more likely is that given ten tests AI will outperform every single human on at least six. This improvement has taken place in the last five or six years. You could argue this was "born" at the time of Watson in 2011, but that makes AI 14 years old. Also we know that AI can improve with more powerful computers, with more data, with better chips and with better software. Every single year we are seeing improvements in these four areas. The pace of improvement is astounding. If you are starting college this year where will AI be in four years when you graduate? Far ahead of you, that is for sure. If you decide to stay in college for two more years to get a Phd, then where will AI be six years from now? At this point if you are not scoring in the top 1% of humans is it worth it to go to college for the next six years? Obviously it depends on several factors, is the cost of education a factor to you? If not and if your father owns the business and if you are scoring in the top 1% of kids it might be.
Godfather of AI WARNS: "You Have No Idea What's Coming"
1. Can we slow down the pace that AI is being developed?
No. There is a global race, even if the US were to slow down the pace of development China, Israel, Europe and the rest will not slow down.
2. Can we make it safe?
No. Same reasons, the US represents 5% of the world's population, we don't control what other countries are doing and in order to keep ahead of everyone else we can't afford to put restrictions on the development of AI.
He thinks for mundane intellectual labor AI will replace everyone. Basically 90% of government jobs are "mundane intellectual labor". All jobs in cubicles is "mundane intellectual labor".
Human actors and actresses are complaining that she was trained using their work (movies, TV shows) without paying them. If we watch your movie or your TV show aren't you getting paid for that? Isn't it true of every single actor out there that they can train by watching other actors and you never have to pay them. How hypocritical. If you learned from Clint Eastwood or Leonardo Dicaprio did you then send them a check in the mail?
This is "thoughtless"? I saw a short clip about an actress in her 30s showing how many millions of dollars she was paid for the various movies she had done so far. In some cases as much as $15 million for a single movie. Now we can replace you with AI for 1% the cost? Perhaps for 0.1% of the cost? How is it that these actors and actresses never thought that people would want to replace them with someone prettier, nicer and cheaper.
The bottom line is that AI is looking to do human jobs. The more you are paid the more appealing it is to AI to take your job.
Consider how they make these cartoon movies by using CGI, how could you not see that the next stage in the evolution would be to replace the actor altogether.
1% or .1% of $15m and we don't have to listen to their liberal politics or watch their attitudes because people fawn over them, and continuing series with favorite actors who don't age or get sick of roles, and maybe movie tickets and subscriptions become less expensive, and........ Maybe worth considering.
Molecular Manufacturing, AI. and The Beast System | Tipping Point with Jimmy Evans
I would remind people that Germany and Japan laughed when FDR called for them to make a hundred thousand airplanes. They thought it was impossible, in the end the US made 300,000. Same with the number of ships.
I say this so that people don't laugh when Elon Musk talks about 100 million robots. Anyone ever consider those horses and locusts that we see in Revelation look a whole lot like some of these military robots they are making. These dogs with machine guns on their back do look a little like a scorpions tail.
"The jobs apocalypse is upon us" -- Steve Bannon
Joe Allen: It's Possible That In 5 Years Time, Tens To Hundreds Of Millions Of People Who's Most Trusted Companion In This World Is A Bot
https://rumble.com/v70m1ru-joe-allen.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
Amazon is planning that the next 600,000 they hire will be robots and AI.
The justification they use is "if we don't do this China will"
Joe Allen: It's Possible That In 5 Years Time, Tens To Hundreds Of Millions Of People Who's Most Trusted Companion In This World Is A Bot
https://rumble.com/v70m1ru-joe-allen.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
Amazon is planning that the next 600,000 they hire will be robots and AI.
The justification they use is "if we don't do this China will"
The temptation to be chipped is going to be immense. This is the broad way that leads to destruction. A kid who would otherwise be a C student struggling with his classes can now be valedictorian if they let AI do everything. The temptation to the 80% of students will be intense because there will be a very clear benefit for free given to kids unable to consider the long term ramifications. Once you go down this road it gets harder and harder to stop. Imagine using AI for two years to put you on the honor roll when in reality you would struggle to get a D on these classes. You are falling further and further behind for these two years and now if you stop you will be fully exposed and probably flunk out. The same threat is to 80% of employees that if you want to keep your job you need to be working together with AI.
https://rumble.com/v70m3h2-joe-allen.html?e9s=src_v1_sa,src_v1_sa_o,src_v1_upp_a
Joe Allen: These CEOs Have A Messiah Complex, They Believe If They Are The Ones To Create The System They Will Be Able To Resist Their Own Inner Demons And Create Something Benevolent
Joe Allen: These CEOs Have A Messiah Complex, They Believe If They Are The Ones To Create The System They Will Be Able To Resist Their Own Inner Demons And Create Something Benevolent