The question was not who could fulfill all righteousness but are there any consequences to not fulfilling all righteousness?Jesus fulfilled all righteousness. You cannot.
The question was not who could fulfill all righteousness but are there any consequences to not fulfilling all righteousness?Jesus fulfilled all righteousness. You cannot.
The thief on the cross beside Jesus had not been baptized,
This is not known..from scripture....
and Jesus replied to him "Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise." Luke 23:43
There is only one requirement for eternal life "very truly I tell you, whoever hears my words and believes him who sent me has eternal life
Not per scripture;
Repentance
Baptism
Righteous living until the end....Is required.
I hasten...if we believe ..we will do The Father's will.
and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life." John 5:24. This will best explain it: https://www.gotquestions.org/baptism-salvation.html
I guess you fail to understand that your question is made moot by the very fact that you cannot fulfill all righteousness. In other words, you ask a senseless question. We put on the righteousness of Christ. He alone fulfilled all righteousness.The question was not who could fulfill all righteousness but are there any consequences to not fulfilling all righteousness?
....you cannot fulfill all righteousness.....[/QUOTE]
M...,
Please define..."all righteousness"...?
Not baptized? How do you know such a thing?
Don’t you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life. Romans 6:3-4M...,
Please define..."all righteousness"...?
The question is by no means "moot".I guess you fail to understand that your question is made moot by the very fact that you cannot fulfill all righteousness. In other words, you ask a senseless question. We put on the righteousness of Christ. He alone fulfilled all righteousness.
Matthew 3:15Jesus answered him, “This is the way it has to be now. This is the proper way to do everything that God requires of us.
Wasn't dodging your question, I answered it at #945. And in respect to your question "are there any consequences to not fulfilling all righteousness" I have a difficult time believing that someone with the Holy Spirit in them would not want to put on the righteousness of Jesus Christ, via of following the leading of the Spirit in regard to baptism. The Spirit brings conviction if one is disobedient, and with disobedience how will there be peace? It would be wise to be obedient to the One you love.The question is by no means "moot".
Matthew 3:15
Regardless of why, there is a proper way to do everything that God requires of us. There is no putting on of His righteousness without our obedience.
Christians are never encouraged to be baptized, they are commanded to be baptized.
You make your comments as though you believe there are those in this thread that do not understand that baptism is a command. I have not read that any where, unless I've possibly missed it somewhere along the way. Are there any other commands of works of righteousness whereby my eternal security can be hinged upon, or does this solely apply to baptism? I believe this would be extremely important to consider if we are to base our salvation on our ability to fulfill righteousness. It would seem to be an imposable task considering God looks on our righteousness as filthy rags. So, to what avail are works of righteousness? How can they be accomplished and not be a vile thing in the sight of God? Does adding my righteousness to the grace of God satisfy the requirements for salvation, or should we be obedient as a children adopted into the family of God fulfilling all righteousness in the context of sanctification that our righteousness not be soiled?The question is by no means "moot".
Matthew 3:15
Regardless of why, there is a proper way to do everything that God requires of us. There is no putting on of His righteousness without our obedience.
Christians are never encouraged to be baptized, they are commanded to be baptized.
Getting baptized in water does NOT gain us salvation. All we need is grace, faith and belief.![]()
b...,
The Bble commands it.
What are you following to conclude that?
Here it is.I...,
You are almost there. Perhaps a little more study will work.
Baptism is required as the final cleansing step of removing sin.
I suggest you go thru The Bible and list all references. They are convincing.
You make your comments as though you believe there are those in this thread that do not understand that baptism is a command. I have not read that any where, unless I've possibly missed it somewhere along the way. Are there any other commands of works of righteousness whereby my eternal security can be hinged upon, or does this solely apply to baptism? I believe this would be extremely important to consider if we are to base our salvation on our ability to fulfill righteousness. It would seem to be an imposable task considering God looks on our righteousness as filthy rags. So, to what avail are works of righteousness? How can they be accomplished and not be a vile thing in the sight of God? Does adding my righteousness to the grace of God satisfy the requirements for salvation, or should we be obedient as a children adopted into the family of God fulfilling all righteousness in the context of sanctification that our righteousness not be soiled?
That is a command given to the apostles TO baptize, not to BE baptized.The command of baptism can be seen in Matt. 28:19-20 "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the ages." This command might be seen as instructional in that it was instructing the disciples on how to baptize new converts, and it shows us that the baptism that Jesus was commanding is very different from the one that than John the Baptist had initiated; a baptism for repentance. With this in mind, it could be concluded that Jesus expected that those who came to faith in Him would be expected to be baptised. More specifically, the Holy Spirit would direct them that baptism is a necessary outward proclamation of an inward conversion, a ceremonial act undertaken upon accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour. Considering it is command for the disciples to do, then it is reasonable to conclude that there is a reciprocating factor in which Jesus is also commanding those who came to faith in Him to be baptized.
Understood, but please read my entire comment. If Jesus gave the command, then it would be reasonable to conclude that He wanted those who came to faith in Him to be baptized. In other words, the Holy Spirit would command or direct baptism of the believer. Jesus is not separate from the Holy Spirit, which guides us in our walk. Therefore, such a command would be given with the expectation that the person coming into faith in Him, is also under direction to be baptised. Why would Jesus give such a command if He did not require that the convert (follower) to be baptized? Jesus sets the standard with His baptism by John, and following His baptism Jesus began His ministry. We are to follow, and following requires obedience to direction or command.That is a command given to the apostles TO baptize, not to BE baptized.
This is a very common misinterpretation of the passage in Mat 28. The context is making disciples through instruction of Who Christ is and teaching them to obey Christ in belief.The command of baptism can be seen in Matt. 28:19-20 "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the ages." This command might be seen as instructional in that it was instructing the disciples on how to baptize new converts, and it shows us that the baptism that Jesus was commanding is very different from the one that than John the Baptist had initiated; a baptism for repentance. With this in mind, it could be concluded that Jesus expected that those who came to faith in Him would be expected to be baptised. More specifically, the Holy Spirit would direct them that baptism is a necessary outward proclamation of an inward conversion, a ceremonial act undertaken upon accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour. Considering it is command for the disciples to do, then it is reasonable to conclude that there is a reciprocating factor in which Jesus is also commanding those who came to faith in Him to be baptized.
In some respect they are being taught of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, but in this context they are actually being baptized in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. We agree that the word "baptizing" used in Mat 28:19 comes from the Greek baptizo; however, according to Strongs (G0907) and other texts it means: to immerse, submerge; to make whelmed (i.e. fully wet); used only (in the New Testament) of ceremonial ablution, especially (technically) of the ordinance of Christian baptism: — Baptist, baptize, wash.This is a very common misinterpretation of the passage in Mat 28. The context is making disciples through instruction of Who Christ is and teaching them to obey Christ in belief.
The Greek uses the word baptizo which makes is highly unlikely that water baptism is the subject of the passage.
Teaching them of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit is doctrinal not ritual.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
In some respect they are being taught of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, but in this context they are actually being baptized in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. We agree that the word "baptizing" used in Mat 28:19 comes from the Greek baptizo; however, according to Strongs (G0907) and other texts it means: to immerse, submerge; to make whelmed (i.e. fully wet); used only (in the New Testament) of ceremonial ablution, especially (technically) of the ordinance of Christian baptism: — Baptist, baptize, wash.
Jesus never commanded anyone to be baptized, but TO baptize. Since there are those who are saying it is a command to BE baptized, I would like to see where this is specifically articulated, without saying what you have just said, in drawing conclusions from the command that was actually given.Understood, but please read my entire comment. If Jesus gave the command, then it would be reasonable to conclude that He wanted those who came to faith in Him to be baptized. In other words, the Holy Spirit would command or direct baptism of the believer. Jesus is not separate from the Holy Spirit, which guides us in our walk. Therefore, such a command would be given with the expectation that the person coming into faith in Him, is also under direction to be baptised. Why would Jesus give such a command if He did not require that the convert (follower) to be baptized? Jesus sets the standard with His baptism by John, and following His baptism Jesus began His ministry. We are to follow, and following requires obedience to direction or command.