Why not?
The dad's gun is not the only gun in town. Neither is the SS, FBI, CIA etc short of loaded weapons to hand over at a moments notice.
So why did he go to his Dad to borrow a gun then?
Why not?
The dad's gun is not the only gun in town. Neither is the SS, FBI, CIA etc short of loaded weapons to hand over at a moments notice.
Tell me all of you Experts in this thread:That is hilarious because the sniper agrees with you. He says that a true sniper would go for the kill shot and not the head shot. But that a head shot would be more horrific and would inflame people all the more. They didn't just want to kill Trump they wanted to inflame riots so they could institute martial law.
Pride goes before a fall. I think they assumed they could kill him any way they pleased. Also, if you are aimed at the head, take a shot, it takes 1-2 seconds for the bullet to get there, then it takes 3-5 seconds to know if you killed him. Since they are aimed at the head they don't change their aim instantaneously to the neck. So they clipped off another two shots that also missed Trump but hit spectators. Then some other gun let off five shots, not at Trump who was already down and out of sight but just to create panic and a riot. Then there was one more shot fired. Possibly from Crooks, so that was when they shot and killed Crooks.
The made up conspiracy theory is that he was a lone wolf. That has been thoroughly debunked.No false narrative. I live in a real world surrounded by real facts not made up conspiracy theories.
So why did he go to his Dad to borrow a gun then?
My point is that Crooks acted alone.The made up conspiracy theory is that he was a lone wolf. That has been thoroughly debunked.
Well if your plan involves a gun but your Dad is only way to get a gun it's not a Government plan now is it?Have you ever had a plan fail and had to improvise?
I understand the point you are making. The problem is that it isn't air-tight.
You are missing the point. If he had bought ammo before the day people would ask why the Secret Service had not been aware of this guy and had him on their radar. If he buys it the morning of the event it gives the Secret Service cover to say they hadn't been notified yet.Tell me all of you Experts in this thread:
Do you buy AMMO before you have a weapon or afterwards?
How do you know which ammo to buy without knowing which weapon you have to use?
Tell me all of you Experts in this thread:
Do you buy AMMO before you have a weapon or afterwards?
How do you know which ammo to buy without knowing which weapon you have to use?
He did not buy ammo because he did not know what kind of gun his Dad would let him borrow. His Dad had 12 guns.You are missing the point. If he had bought ammo before the day people would ask why the Secret Service had not been aware of this guy and had him on their radar. If he buys it the morning of the event it gives the Secret Service cover to say they hadn't been notified yet.
Also, he walks into the store, he could have asked for hollow points for his gun, but if they don' t have any in stock then the false narrative of him being the shooter falls apart.
As a cover story they want him buying the ammo the day of the event and that has to be the ammo they use.
That is false. The audio is conclusive proof we have 2 shooters, maybe 3, and we still have not gotten any proof that Crooks even shot his gun. So it is possible that counting Crooks there are 4.My point is that Crooks acted alone.
Tell me:
Tell me all of you Experts in this thread:
Do you buy AMMO before you have a weapon or afterwards?
I don't use guns. Nor have I ever done a hit job for The US government.
There's audio of the ss sniper shooting to.That is false. The audio is conclusive proof we have 2 shooters, maybe 3, and we still have not gotten any proof that Crooks even shot his gun. So it is possible that counting Crooks there are 4.
You keep making these claims without providing us the links.He did not buy ammo because he did not know what kind of gun his Dad would let him borrow. His Dad had 12 guns.
You just don't want to believe in facts.You keep making these claims without providing us the links.
1. Provide us the link to the interview where the Dad says he gave permission to the son to use the gun.
2. Provide the link where the Dad says he has 12 guns.
3. Provide the link that says the Dad would even decide which gun his 20 year old son could take to the shooting range.
Till then, enough with trying to beat everyone down with your unsubstantiated claims. Thankyou.
Well if your plan involves a gun but your Dad is only way to get a gun it's not a Government plan now is it?
If there was another way the boy would not even have used his Dad's weapon.You are the one insisting that it's the ONLY way. No one else is saying that. There was a local gun club for goodness sake.
I'm going to repeat myself; Using his own weapon makes perfect sense if they wanted to give their scapegoat an air of authenticity as a local/lone psycho. That does not prove that they weren't capable and willing to improvise if something didn't go according to plan.
I have asked you repeatedly to give us a link that backs up your claims. You have insulted others and talked about how easy it is to get the link, and yet you still haven't provided it while treating it like the gospel truth. You have lost your credibility with me and most likely with many other people on this forum. Back up your claims with links so we can look at them.You just don't want to believe in facts.
You like conspiracies so go live in your pretend world.
It is so hard finding good patsies these days.You are the one insisting that it's the ONLY way. No one else is saying that. There was a local gun club for goodness sake.
I'm going to repeat myself; Using his own weapon makes perfect sense if they wanted to give their scapegoat an air of authenticity as a local/lone psycho. That does not prove that they weren't capable and willing to improvise if something didn't go according to plan.
It's on the timeline. It's not hard to find it. You just don't do it because it proves your conspiracy jokes wrong.I have asked you repeatedly to give us a link that backs up your claims. You have insulted others and talked about how easy it is to get the link, and yet you still haven't provided it while treating it like the gospel truth. You have lost your credibility with me and most likely with many other people on this forum. Back up your claims with links so we can look at them.
You dismiss a professional sniper trained by the US military and working for the US government in his assessment because he was on Alex Jones and yet you want us to believe your claim without any link that we can assess. What did you hear this from some kid in Gaza on Tik Tok? Give us the links.
Especially ones who must get permission from Dad to use his gun.It is so hard finding good patsies these days.