Applying God's Word to Politics

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,847
4,503
113
IN Amercia the law of the land is the Constitution.
we have a Bill of Rights. We are not a Democracy we are a Constitutional republic which ensure we have individual rights. The Democracy part is on Nover 5th when we vote for the POTUS and other representatives.

Jesu said to render to Ceasar what is Ceaser and TO GOD what is Gods. WE are to obey the law of the land .

If those laws complement Loving God and our neighbor as ourselves we should obey it.
Actually all 3 words historically represent our government.

etymology: democracy comes from the Greek roots meaning “rule by the people,”

Republic comes from the Latin roots meaning “public good” or “public affair,” used in ancient Rome to mean simply “state” or “country” with reference to the representative democracy of the Roman Republic.

A governmental constitution is a social code, which declares the character of the government, and defines the philosophies and values to which society must conform.

A democracy is rule by the people which we are.
A Republic demands that rule to be for the public good of all people (to restrict majority rule)
A condition created by the people for the public good was created to restrict federal governments power.
 

Aaron56

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2021
2,760
1,584
113
In a free democratic country, it is a Christian responsibility to preserve religious freedom...
The only Christian society I see in the scripture is in the New Jerusalem. Within that country there is no religious freedom.

Like many church people, you are conflating Americanism with the government of God. This is part of the "great delusion".

In full disclosure, I've dissuaded few from continuing to support corrupt politicians. It is because my standard is different than theirs: they believe the tenets of the US Constitution represent a higher standard than those of Christ. Because of this, we cannot begin to discuss political matters with common ground.
 

Aaron56

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2021
2,760
1,584
113
First and foremost, government was instituted by God. That is obvious that we are to be part of the process.

Romans 13:1
English Standard Version

13 Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.

We as a nation are responsible as a whole for the evil we do or allow. If God judges the nation, the righteous like Daniel are affected as well.

Jeremiah 18:7-10
English Standard Version

7 If at any time I declare concerning a nation or a kingdom, that I will pluck up and break down and destroy it, 8 and if that nation, concerning which I have spoken, turns from its evil, I will relent of the disaster that I intended to do to it. 9 And if at any time I declare concerning a nation or a kingdom that I will build and plant it, 10 and if it does evil in my sight, not listening to my voice, then I will relent of the good that I had intended to do to it.

We are the salt of the Earth to help preserve what is good.

Matthew 5:13
English Standard Version

13 “You are the salt of the earth, but if salt has lost its taste, how shall its saltiness be restored? It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trampled under people's feet.

Good government is God's command, bad government (made up of the people we choose in a democracy either by voting or not voting) we are either voting for terror or accepting terror by not voting.

Romans 13:3
English Standard Version

3 For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval,

Also, let us all remember those who worked in governments to influence for the good.

1. Joseph from slave to 2nd in command
2. Moses liberated his people from bad government and built a new one.
3. The people wanted a King, so God gave them a King. The majority of kings did evil but a few including King David by majority followed God.
4. Ezra and Nehemiah (Nehemiah being a cucupbeareror the king) hid influence allowed him to return to build the walls.
5. Esther would influence her husband despite it may ending in her death.
6. Many of the prophets influenced kings to make righteous choices.
7. John the Baptist was beheaded for getting involved in addressing the immoral acts of a political leader.
7. Jesus was heavily involved in trying to influence the religious political system of His day.
8. Paul quite often appealed to his Roman rights to influence the government.
Your conclusions come from an American reality only.

Try to apply these standards to believers in Communist China, North Korea, etc. and their validity quickly falls apart.

13 Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.
This is referring to the government of God. Most cannot see it because of Rome's insistence upon "the divine right of kings". Therefore, many church people do not recognize those who are sent by God to lead them: a consequence of unbelief.
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
727
187
43
Of course, He uses everyone differently. I'm simply saying that to be not involved in government is against the commands of God as stated in post 99.
Good discussion everybody. I even like what Publican said because he referred to one of my favorite Pauline principles: Christians are members of one body or orchestra with different parts or instruments to play. (1 CR 12:4-31)
 

Aaron56

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2021
2,760
1,584
113
Rome, way back in the 380's, when they offered the church to be the state church of the empire, offered church leadership:

1. Health care
2. Lower taxes
3. Preferred property ownership and business
4. Strong military support
5. Clean up corruption to make things more "Christian"

In exchange, the church had to support the current administration and say their actions were ordained by God.

They took the offer.

The church began to rule by the decree of the Roman government. It married with politics in order to gain power and influence so that the church could "get things done for Christ".

Any of this sound familiar?
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,847
4,503
113
The only Christian society I see in the scripture is in the New Jerusalem. Within that country there is no religious freedom.

Like many church people, you are conflating Americanism with the government of God. This is part of the "great delusion".

In full disclosure, I've dissuaded few from continuing to support corrupt politicians. It is because my standard is different than theirs: they believe the tenets of the US Constitution represent a higher standard than those of Christ. Because of this, we cannot begin to discuss political matters with common ground.
(The only Christian society I see in the scripture is in the New Jerusalem. Within that country there is no religious freedom.)

It doesn't matter. God instituted government Romans 13:1. Our was instituted with religious freedom just as our gospel respects free will.

(Like many church people, you are conflating Americanism with the government of God. This is part of the "great delusion".)

Not so. As post 99 states, we will be held accountable for our actions or inactions.

(In full disclosure, I've dissuaded few from continuing to support corrupt politicians. It is because my standard is different than theirs: they believe the tenets of the US Constitution represent a higher standard than those of Christ. )

Interesting. So the Christians who vote follow a lower standard than Christ?

Corrupt must be defined. Do you mean by sin? Then we all are corrupt. Or do you mean by factual proven misuse of government power and taxes? Or the entire system despite the good people within it?

It is one thing to vote for known corruption and another to vote with a good conscious.

(Because of this, we cannot begin to discuss political matters with common ground.)

Political matters are either moral, amoral, or immoral. Either a policy promoted by a politician is moral, amoral, or immoral. What is moral is defined by the Bible.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,847
4,503
113
Rome, way back in the 380's, when they offered the church to be the state church of the empire, offered church leadership:

1. Health care
2. Lower taxes
3. Preferred property ownership and business
4. Strong military support
5. Clean up corruption to make things more "Christian"

In exchange, the church had to support the current administration and say their actions were ordained by God.

They took the offer.

The church began to rule by the decree of the Roman government. It married with politics in order to gain power and influence so that the church could "get things done for Christ".

Any of this sound familiar?
Actually this is not our reality. Most churches are against for example nationwide abortions among many current issues.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,847
4,503
113
Rome, way back in the 380's, when they offered the church to be the state church of the empire, offered church leadership:

1. Health care
2. Lower taxes
3. Preferred property ownership and business
4. Strong military support
5. Clean up corruption to make things more "Christian"

In exchange, the church had to support the current administration and say their actions were ordained by God.

They took the offer.

The church began to rule by the decree of the Roman government. It married with politics in order to gain power and influence so that the church could "get things done for Christ".

Any of this sound familiar?
Actually this is not our reality. Most churches are against for example nationwide abortions among many current issues. To say the U.S. church is being controlled by the government is false. The only way this currently has occurred is the threat to lose tax exemption or through lawfare and as seen with Covid, many resisted.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,887
29,274
113
2 Chronicles 7:14 (condensed): “If my people will humble themselves and turn from their wicked ways, then I will forgive their sin and heal their land.”

2 Chronicles 7:14 If my people who are called by My name humble themselves and pray and seek My face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, forgive their sin, and heal their land.
:)
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,007
4,317
113
Actually all 3 words historically represent our government.

etymology: democracy comes from the Greek roots meaning “rule by the people,”

Republic comes from the Latin roots meaning “public good” or “public affair,” used in ancient Rome to mean simply “state” or “country” with reference to the representative democracy of the Roman Republic.

A governmental constitution is a social code, which declares the character of the government, and defines the philosophies and values to which society must conform.

A democracy is rule by the people which we are.
A Republic demands that rule to be for the public good of all people (to restrict majority rule)
A condition created by the people for the public good was created to restrict federal governments power.

The majority rules in a democracy. If we were a Democracy, then California and New York would elect the president every four years because those two states have the majority of the Population.

That is not the case now. If you violate my individual rights, you can be sued or even placed in jail, even if you are the majority.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,847
4,503
113
The majority rules in a democracy. If we were a Democracy, then California and New York would elect the president every four years because those two states have the majority of the Population.

That is not the case now. If you violate my individual rights, you can be sued or even placed in jail, even if you are the majority.
I'm only speaking of the definition and not how they are applied.

In reality it goes in this order Democracy+Republic+ Constitution= a government that was far superior than the Greek Democracy or the Roman Republic.
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,007
4,317
113
I'm only speaking of the definition and not how they are applied.

In reality it goes in this order Democracy+Republic+ Constitution= a government that was far superior than the Greek Democracy or the Roman Republic.
good point, but what makes America's superior is this statement by our Founding Fathers:



From John Adams to Massachusetts Militia, 11 October 1798


Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

The God on who this Nation was founded is the Lifeblood of this Nation. Without GOD, we are done.
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
727
187
43
good point, but what makes America's superior is this statement by our Founding Fathers:



From John Adams to Massachusetts Militia, 11 October 1798


Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

The God on who this Nation was founded is the Lifeblood of this Nation. Without GOD, we are done.
Both of you have good points and harmonizing them is how we arrive at a closer approximation or better understanding of the truth.
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
727
187
43
Now please consider the following policies and decide which ones Christians should support.

For Whom Should I Vote?
(A comparison of policies)

Issue A B

Border Open to unvetted millions-- Control with fence & patrols

Education Socialists indoctrinate students-- Parents approve teachers

Finances Taxes spent to enrich elites-- Tariffs applied to support jobs

Elections No voter ID & no audits-- Voter ID, verifiable results

Pandemics Use as excuse to dictate behavior-- Preserve right of medical choice

Abortion Allow killing of viable fetuses-- Limit killing; prevent pregnancy

Crime Limited protection & punishment-- Prevent, arrest, confine, reform

Energy Depend on unreliable sources-- Use oil/gas but test alternatives

Race Foment division and turmoil-- Unity based on common values

Climate Hype problem; expand regulations-- Practical ways to limit pollution

Economy Print money; eliminate ownership-- Expand middle; ban oligarchy

Politics Marxist/Fascist dictatorship-- Caring capitalism & democracy

Family Parents serve governments-- Parental authority until age 18

Business Regulated by government-- Privately owned; minimal regs

Constitution No longer valued or heeded-- Esteemed as wise & adaptable

Military Employed by politicians-- Preserve peace; PTSD for enemy

Ethics Whatever human wizards decide-- Based mainly on New Testament

Media Subverted by globalist elites-- Fair investigative journalism

Truth Cancel, cover up, flip, persecute-- Scientific, public, common sense

Labor Low wages; profits for stocks-- Pay & benefits; profit-sharing

Healthcare Government controlled, welfare -- Workfare, competitive pricing

Thanks! (I think this may not post correctly, so I hope you can figure it out. It is supposed to be two columns.)

Over...
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,007
4,317
113
Now please consider the following policies and decide which ones Christians should support.

For Whom Should I Vote?
(A comparison of policies)

Issue A B

Border Open to unvetted millions-- Control with fence & patrols

Education Socialists indoctrinate students-- Parents approve teachers

Finances Taxes spent to enrich elites-- Tariffs applied to support jobs

Elections No voter ID & no audits-- Voter ID, verifiable results

Pandemics Use as excuse to dictate behavior-- Preserve right of medical choice

Abortion Allow killing of viable fetuses-- Limit killing; prevent pregnancy

Crime Limited protection & punishment-- Prevent, arrest, confine, reform

Energy Depend on unreliable sources-- Use oil/gas but test alternatives

Race Foment division and turmoil-- Unity based on common values

Climate Hype problem; expand regulations-- Practical ways to limit pollution

Economy Print money; eliminate ownership-- Expand middle; ban oligarchy

Politics Marxist/Fascist dictatorship-- Caring capitalism & democracy

Family Parents serve governments-- Parental authority until age 18

Business Regulated by government-- Privately owned; minimal regs

Constitution No longer valued or heeded-- Esteemed as wise & adaptable

Military Employed by politicians-- Preserve peace; PTSD for enemy

Ethics Whatever human wizards decide-- Based mainly on New Testament

Media Subverted by globalist elites-- Fair investigative journalism

Truth Cancel, cover up, flip, persecute-- Scientific, public, common sense

Labor Low wages; profits for stocks-- Pay & benefits; profit-sharing

Healthcare Government controlled, welfare -- Workfare, competitive pricing

Thanks! (I think this may not post correctly, so I hope you can figure it out. It is supposed to be two columns.)

Over...
You should vote for who you think is the person best to represent your positions.


I will not vote for any democrat. they are demonic. haters of GOD and shed innocent blood
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
727
187
43
You should vote for who you think is the person best to represent your positions.


I will not vote for any democrat. they are demonic. haters of GOD and shed innocent blood
Yes, and hopefully our positions are the policies on the right.
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
727
187
43
At this point I will list a few bones of contention I have with politicians and pundits for y'all to add to if desired.

a. Not quoting exactly or not considering the totality of what someone has said, but instead bloviating about a part out of context,

b. Not valuing substance over style or policy over the way it may be stated,

c. Failing to acknowledge that socialism is a form of immorality, because it has hurt people wherever it has been implemented.

d. Failing to realize that there is no such thing as "free" trade because of tariffs and limits being levied on U.S. imports by other countries.

e. Failing to learn lessons that history teaches, especially regarding wars, which I plan to discuss under "W" when we get there on the Various Moral Issues thread.

f. Failing to acknowledge that murderers need to be engaged and stopped as soon as possible, preferably by armed police, but possibly by citizens carrying concealed hand guns.

g. Saying “Americans” want this or that instead of saying “most” (or some percentage) of Americans are for something per polls.

h. Failing to “get into the weeds” and educate viewers, but rather opining/bloviating superficially,

I. Stating that a party “controls Congress”, when current Senate rules require 60 votes to end a filibuster,

j. Referring to Dems as Progressives, when progressive capitalism was a beneficial policy of the Pubs in the early 1900s, and socialist Dem policies are Regressive.

k. This last one stems from my having been an English teacher: Saying “No” when they agree with the questioner.

Over...
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
727
187
43
Applying Christian beliefs to politics has been problematic ever since Peter told the Sanhedrin "We must obey God rather than men!" (Acts 5:29)

How should we do this in the current political situation to issues such as national borders, abortion, globalism and lawfare?
I do not think we have adequately discussed any of these, so may I suggest that we address the issue of migration, which I find one of the most difficult ones to apply Scripture to?
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
727
187
43
I do not think we have adequately discussed any of these, so may I suggest that we address the issue of migration, which I find one of the most difficult ones to apply Scripture to?
IOW, what is God's will regarding how migration should occur? It surely is not the "king of the hill" [KOTH] violence that has been the main method from the beginning!

What teaching of Scripture may apply to this moral/political issue?
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
727
187
43
IOW, what is God's will regarding how migration should occur? It surely is not the "king of the hill" [KOTH] violence that has been the main method from the beginning!

What teaching of Scripture may apply to this moral/political issue?
Since KOTH is surely not God’s will, what is His will regarding migration. What biblical teachings are applicable?

After suggesting this topic I did some study and here is what I came up with:

The Bible mentions the migration of Cain (in GN 4:12 & 16) and migrations following the building of the tower at Babel (in GN 11:1-9). Secular histories cite migrations by unknown peoples that established civilizations near the mouths of the Indus, Nile and Euphrates rivers, followed by Akkadians invading the Sumerians and Aryans invading India about 2270 B.C. Abram migrated from Mesopotamia (per GN 12:1-10), then Israel settled in Canaan (GN 35:1-21 & 46:1-7) about the time Sumeria was conquered by Amorites, then Kassites. Moses led the Israelites from Egypt to Canaan (EX 13:17-20, 15:22-16:1, 17:1, 19:1-2, 33:1-2, NM 21:10-31 & NM 33).

NM 33 instructs the Israelites to drive out all of the inhabitants of Canaan so that their idolatry would not give them trouble, and NM 35:33-34 tells them not to pollute or defile the land with bloodshed, so apparently driving out was not supposed to be by means of murder. Listing the history of migrations merely documents that KOTH was the way it always occurred, so now let us consider how migrations OUGHT to have happened in accordance with God’s Will beginning with the migration to America by Europeans.

We begin with the only hint we have had thus far—the proscription against bloodshed/murder. A NT principle that can be applicable is MT 7:12, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” An OT one is EX 20:15, “You shall not steal.” These two commands indicate that when people migrate they must do so with the intention of compensating the owners of the new land rather than of conquering them by means of violence. Thus, murdering the Indians instead of making and keeping treaties was wrong. Ditto for the Indians who did the same. (Death resulting from illness and struggle against natural disasters are other aspects of KOTH.)

Another critical migration that needs to be evaluated is when Jews moved to Palestine following WWII. It began with war or KOTH that has continued ever since. It would seem that God’s will would have been for the Jews to purchase land from Palestinians and obtain a legal deed. Besides being peaceful, it probably would have been cheaper in the long run to pay them $10,000 per acre!

This brings us to consider the migration currently occurring over the U.S. borders. In this case there is a line of people seeking to enter legally via a vetting process, so what justification can there be for people to cut in line by stealing across the border illegally? The right of an individual home owner to require people to enter their houses/walls only if invited seems applicable to a nation regarding control of its borders.

God loves everyone in the world (JN 3:16) and includes all kinds of people in His plan of salvation (GAL 3:28-29, 1TM 2:3-4). Thus, we all have equal rights, which need to be respected as people move about planet Earth. There is no justification for feeling superior to anyone of a different nationality or civilization.

As we have mentioned, migration needs to occur without murder or stealing (MT 19:18). Selfishness by those who have something does not justify stealing by those who lack and covet it. Two wrongs do not make a right. (Hezekiah 6:1) However, the rich should share (2CR 8:14) and the poor should rightly resist hoarders. Those who have an abundance of land or material possessions should realize they have no divine right to hoard it, but on the contrary they have a divine command from God to be compassionate toward the poor.

Paul teaches that those who are able should work (2THS 3:10), so a valid reason for migration would seem to be in order to look for a job. Other considerations include the need to practice birth control in order not to procreate more children than the parents can afford to feed, besides being good stewards of the planet by not over-populating and polluting the world God has given humanity. Also, good governors and employers are needed, who will legislate opportunity and pay fairly.