Where does the Bible tell us that God spoke Hebrew? I am simply applyingWhat Language do you think God used with the Ancient HEBREW PEOPLE?
your standard here. The Bible does not say that, so why do you assume it?
Where does the Bible tell us that God spoke Hebrew? I am simply applyingWhat Language do you think God used with the Ancient HEBREW PEOPLE?
But I don't know the process, I am guessing like anyone else.Applying your standard here, the Bible would tell us if women were impregnated in vitro.
Applying your standard here, the Bible would tell us if Mary was impregnated the same way you
believe angels impregnated women. Applying your standard here, the Bible would tell us that is
how Jesus was placed into the womb of Mary instead of repeatedly being told she conceived.
It's your standard too!Where does the Bible tell us that God spoke Hebrew? I am simply applying
your standard here. The Bible does not say that, so why do you assume it?
That is your guess, sure, but it is not the only conclusion to be drawn. Your insistence that it is, is a logical fallacy.But I don't know the process, I am guessing like anyone else.
But i know when the Bible says specifically HUMAN WOMEN but does not label the men, that means these are not human men.
It's your standard too!
You think the men are human when the Bible only tells us the Women are. The Bible is ALWAYS Right!
When Jesus called people children of the devil, were they in vitro created that way by Satan also?הַנְּפִלִ֞ים הָי֣וּ בָאָ֘רֶץ֮ בַּיָּמִ֣ים הָהֵם֒ וְגַ֣ם אַֽחֲרֵי־כֵ֗ן אֲשֶׁ֨ר יָבֹ֜אוּ בְּנֵ֤י הָֽאֱלֹהִים֙ אֶל־בְּנ֣וֹת הָֽאָדָ֔ם וְיָלְד֖וּ לָהֶ֑ם הֵ֧מָּה הַגִּבֹּרִ֛ים אֲשֶׁ֥ר מֵעוֹלָ֖ם אַנְשֵׁ֥י הַשֵּֽׁם׃ {פ}
It was then, and later too, that the Nephilim appeared on earth—when divine beings cohabited with the human women, who bore them offspring. Such were the heroes of old, the men of renown.
Notice, the HEBREW, Divine Beings are the MEN and HUMAN WOMEN
Notice, NO SEX...only COHABITED!!
It is a Story that describes who was involved. Human Women and .....just mThe Bible tells us the men are human too, it just uses different words to exemplify certain characteristics about them.
Language is not monolithic, there are different ways to say the same thing or different things. Context is the key.
Look, this Story is only for how the Nephilim got on Earth, this has nothing to do with You or Myself getting here.When Jesus called people children of the devil, were they in vitro created that way by Satan also?
You were the one who said we would be told something if it were a fact. Jesus told certain people they were children of theLook, this Story is only for how the Nephilim got on Earth, this has nothing to do with You or Myself getting here.
It doesn't matter. Get past it. We are discussing THIS TODAY not what's on your mind from yesterday.You were the one who said we would be told something if it were a fact. Jesus told certain people they were children of the
devil, that the devil was their father. Surely if you are consistent in how you interpret the Bible, that can only mean one thing,
that being, that the devil impregnated women the same way you are saying other angels impregnated women to bear children.
Look, this Story is only for how the Nephilim got on Earth, this has nothing to do with You or Myself getting here.
We still are in the lineage of Noah at this point.
I see you do not want to be held to your very own standard. It is shoddy. I understand.It doesn't matter. Get past it. We are discussing THIS TODAY not what's on your mind from yesterday.
The Fact is, the Bible is clear HUMAN WOMEN, Divine Beings as Men, we come from Noah, not this Story about Nephilim..
NO, Nephilim are 50% human.Nephilim are people too.
You have been watching too much science fiction and then thinking it connects to the Bible.
I will leave to your beyond reality theories. This kind of extrapolating to the extreme from scripture does not interest me.
I am HUMAN and make many errors. I did admit to already being wrong. But you want me to admit for the next 20 posts. I meant it the first time I offered it! It has not changed.I see you do not want to be held to your very own standard. It is shoddy. I understand.
The Bible does not say Nephilim were angel babies. Your standard fails again.
I did not see the admission you refer to here...I am HUMAN and make many errors. I did admit to already being wrong. But you want me
to admit for the next 20 posts. I meant it the first time I offered it! It has not changed.
where does it say that they could? There was a law given at that time.Where does it say the line of Cain should not marry the line of Seth? There were no laws given at this time.
It was Yesterday!I did not see the admission you refer to here...
The Bible refutes that notion also. The context is false prophets and their lusts.Yes that is true, I reread the passage, however angels cannot procreate and are not sexual, end of story.