Well, when has any leader been of good moral character?
All of this simply takes the focus off of the actual subject. Explain to me how a person who claims to be a born-again Christian can possibly vote for a person who makes it very clear that they are amoral. What leaders do or not do "in secret" is meaningless because there is no way the average person could know about that behavior, so it is not germane to the subject at hand. It's a subjective judgment in the first place and smacks of conspiracy theory.