Usually I wouldn't even bother to get into the semantics of why evolution is a false doctrine. But let's pretend momentarily that I'm an atheist and I don't have the creationist outlook on life that I have. I'll show you from the perspective of an atheist why evolution is a groundless and baseless "theory", and certainly not a fact. The arrogance by the way of that comment, in calling evolution a fact... is astounding to me.
Anyways,
1.) Single Cell Complexity Proves Evolution is Wrong
It wasn't that long ago when scientists believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left-hand protein molecule as found in all animals.
2.) DNA Error Checking Proves Evolution is Wrong
The scientific fact that DNA replication includes a built-in error checking method and a DNA repair process proves the evolutionary theory is wrong. The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed. Cells do not mutate on their own.
3.) Origin of Matter and Stars Proves Evolution is Wrong
Evolutionists just throw up their hands at the question of the origin of matter because they know something cannot evolve from nothing. They stick their heads in the sand and ignore the problem. The fact that matter exists in outrageously large quantities simply proves evolution is wrong. The "Big Bang" theory doesn't solve the problem either. Matter and energy have to come from somewhere.
I'll leave it at that for now, these are three huge problems and gaps in the "theory" of evolution. Again, I've said this before to you, and I mean no offense in what I say, but before you defend a position so adamantly I think it's important that you first be aware of the facts. You're fastened onto these initial concepts you've adopted as your own and I think it's a dangerous thing to call evolution a fact when it has no evidence to support it's senselessness whatsoever.
The simple fact of the matter is, the building does not exist without a builder, and a garden cannot be without planters. That is the simplest way it can possibly be explained. Creation IS fact. Evolution is dependent on chance and time, which chance and time are filled to the brim with uncertainties, and anomalies that are not measurable or testable in any way shape or form.
None of what you've listed even remotely conflicts with the theory of evolution. At all. In essence, you've asserted two thinly-veiled arguments from ignorance alongside what might charitably be considered non sequitur, and you've asserted that these "problems" that don't exist are legitimately problematic to evolution on a scientific basis. That
simply isn't true from a scientific perspective.
Your first assertion concerning the complexity of cells arbitrarily injects abiogenesis into an argument from a
pathetic appeal to incredulity or an argument from a lack of imagination. "It's super complex, so it couldn't have come about on its own -- just because." Really, it's no better than that, and I think you know that. Beyond that, relatively recent scientific experiments have indeed created synthetic cells capable of replicating themselves and performing chemical reactions through functioning organelles. Feel absolutely free to look into it.
Your second point has no bearing on evolution at all, and would frankly be laughed at by geneticists. Evolution by natural selection doesn't occur on an individual basis for a given organism in a species; mutations that yield a competitive advantage occur as organisms reproduce and yield offspring that may be more competitive than their predecessors. There's a reason why mutations are so successful in quickly breeding desirable traits in organisms for humans via natural selection -- evolution simply accepts what works and tosses out what doesn't through extinction. Countless plants and animals have been artificially bred by humans, and beyond human interaction, there's no biological difference between natural and artificial selection. My cat with a bobbed tail that's sitting on my lap right now is evidence of evolution through mutations in offspring.
Your third point has nothing to do with evolution, and I frankly can't figure out what you're even attempting to get at, since theistic evolution is capable of answering the alleged incompatibility between theology and modern biological science. How in the world does the amount of matter in the universe "prove evolution as wrong"? How? I mean... What? Huh?
Again, none of this has any bearing on evolution at all. Really, you must understand that it's easily refuted by little more than a working, basic knowledge of how evolution actually works as opposed to a willfully ignorant set of misconceptions upon which to base meaningless straw men off of.
