hmm not sure how you're measuring to get that; she would in sorrow bring forth children, which isn't something one does all the days of their life, but he would all the days of his life in sorrow eat of the ground? so, if we measure by 'amount of sorrow' and measure sorrow by 'time spent in it' then Adam seems to have received more.
it's also for Adam's sake the ground is cursed, not Woman's.
IMO 'the punishment fit the crime' -- and how they are judged reflects how they sinned. that their judgement in that way informs us about what desire they had that underpinned their transgression: Woman wished to rule over her husband, to restrict her conception, to joy in it. Adam wished blessing to result from the fruit of the ground; i believe he sinned because he loved his wife, and hoped that through joining her in sin, he would save her from death - a vanity - while woman, being deceived, sinned because she hoped she would magnify herself, also a vanity.
it's absolutely true that both subtleties are present in us as humans; we sin out of pride in ourselves and sometimes even knowing that what we do is evil, we choose it. we also sin sometimes because we do not understand what we are doing, but have been led astray, whether by someone's influence or by our own vain desires. we sin in direct transgression of commands and also in opposition to eternal precepts of right and wrong where we do not have a command we are liable to, but a truth we have no excuse not to know.
we sin for all kinds of reasons -- or maybe when we get down to it, by another measure, only one reason: replacing the truth with a lie, having 'another god' before the One True God. pride; harkening to a voice other than the Lord's. but we have sin because Adam sinned. he had a choice when Woman came to him, with death in her, and death not in him. he could have let her to die. if he had, what? would God have made a new wife for him? possibly. but he joined her in death, and instead of there being two humans on earth, one with sin, one without, there became two humans on earth, both with sin -- all with sin, until there came the Son of God born of woman but not born of man, the Son of Man in whom there is no sin.
Sighs
The Woman is of the Man so his punishment applies to her. You think the man eating the dust of the earth and the woman eating ribeye steak? If the earth was not cursed for Adams sake they would be devoured.
In a post above you are trying to rationalize why Adam should be counted with the transgressions when it gives why Eve is counted with the transgression in the New Testament.
I believe you are being disingenous because if these verses
1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
1Ti 2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
Jas 1:14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
Jas 1:15 Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.
had stated
And
the Woman was not deceived, but Adam being deceived was in the transgression.
1Ti 2:15 Notwithstanding
He shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
Jas 1:14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
Jas 1:15 Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.
Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
And
when Adam saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise,
He took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and
gave also unto his wife with him; and she did eat.
then your Correction and Reproof would have been strong and swift.
Pro 15:10 Correction is grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die.
------------------------------------
This is why there are thousands of different Christian denominations with me.
You can be honest with me. Even though those verses seem to say what they say you don't feel like they should say what they say because the woman is supposed to be pure or immaculate compared to the seed of Man.
My reading comprehension can be above average at times but my righteousness without faith is as dirty rags so no condemnation from me.
-- the context of Romans 5 is not the same context as 1 Timothy, which is to say, the purpose of what is being called to attention isn't the same in both places. here in Romans, it's being explained how that all are under sin. that's by Adam, specifically, not by 'male/female conglomerate' -- this is Greek, and the name 'Adam' isn't the same in Greek as the word 'mankind' so we aren't looking at a case where we have to by context interpret whether we're talking about mankind in general or about the specific person, Adam. we know we are talking about Adam: that's how sin entered mankind. through the one who sinned even though he wasn't deceived; who knew his wife had death, and he did not, and joined her in it, willingly, knowingly. 
