To suffer for doing what is correct and right is suffering with our Savior.18You who are slaves must submit to your masters with all respect. Do what they tell you ā not only if they are kind and reasonable, but even if they are cruel. 19For God is pleased when, conscious of his will, you patiently endure unjust treatment. 20Of course you get no credit for being patient if you are beaten for doing wrong.
Love, forgiveness, grace and mercy in Jesus Christ is the collective essence of Scripture, yet here we see Peter being obtuse and seemingly uncaring towards slaves who are beaten. If I am incorrect in my assessment then please share your enlightenment.
So angry and I would say that calling a fellow believer an Idiot is definitely contrary to the Word of God.Youāre an idiot. You know nothing about me, but itās painfully obvious youāre a judgmental, pharisaic perfectionist lost in his own pride. Carry on, wayward son.
I would have no problem killing a cruel slaveholder; not then, not now.
18You who are slaves must submit to your masters with all respect. Do what they tell you ā not only if they are kind and reasonable, but even if they are cruel. 19For God is pleased when, conscious of his will, you patiently endure unjust treatment. 20Of course you get no credit for being patient if you are beaten for doing wrong.
Love, forgiveness, grace and mercy in Jesus Christ is the collective essence of Scripture, yet here we see Peter being obtuse and seemingly uncaring towards slaves who are beaten. If I am incorrect in my assessment then please share your enlightenment.
All you did was incorrect. My Bible has the remainder of verse 20 but the focus of the OP was the first part of verse 20. You come in with guns blazing, assuming Iām reading a corrupted version of Scripture. Thanks anyway.So angry and I would say that calling a fellow believer an Idiot is definitely contrary to the Word of God.
Matthew 5:21&22
āYou have heard that it was said to those of old, āYou shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.ā But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, āYou fool!ā will be liable to the hell of fire.
Getting angry enough to call me a name without a doubt is a reflection of the condition of your heart and the corrupted bible you are studying from is also a reflection of your heart.
All I did was point out how the bible version you are using is corrupted by leaving out words that God intended to be in His Word and that made you really angry???? You should be grateful that someone took the time to point that out to you.
Don't worry though. I was not insulted because My Father has blessed me with an understanding heart.
To sin. And that āmasterā has been destroyed.Were you ever a slave?
A lot of egotistical finger pointing from people on this thread. But I digress; continue with your incorrect projections.Do you really think that you are better peron than Peter was? I would suggest that you should think again.
So you would sit back and watch someone be harshly beaten; again and again and again. Thanks for your honesty.Then you would be and are in fact guilty of murder..
Do not judge least you be judged in the same manor.. If you believe a person should be killed for sinning then do not be surprised when on the day of judgement Jesus judges you in the very same manor..
So you would sit back and watch someone be harshly beaten; again and again and again. Thanks for your honesty.
On another note, if you think Jesus condemns His own for passions of righteous indignation, you are sorely mistaken.
Read John 5:24
I appreciate your concern but youāve taken things out of context. Itās astonishing how often that happens here on CC.I have no problem with righteous indignation,, but the point i was responding to was not about righteous indignation.. It was the stated desire to kill someone.. And since you have not repented of it and in fact seek to justify yourself in it, then i do fear for your eternal destiny..
To sin. And that āmasterā has been destroyed.
So you would sit back and watch someone be harshly beaten; again and again and again. Thanks for your honesty.
On another note, if you think Jesus condemns His own for passions of righteous indignation, you are sorely mistaken.
Read John 5:24
Thank you, Eleven! This is the wisdom and understanding I was trying to gain. Itās an excellent summation and I appreciate your time and effort in sharing.I really think it is important to put this in context of the "times" of Roman society and slaves in that world and in context of the early church.
We had a teacher who knew Latin at my high school so I was able to take Latin for three years and we studied Roman culture quite a bit to help understand the writings of that time.
The slaves of the ancient world lived a very different reality than slaves in our more recent history, the slaves had no rights, they were a possession, but many had significant "professional" roles within that culture.
They were gained by war.
Some were abused but most were not and some even were given their freedom and rights by their owners.
I think Peter did not want slaves to rebel ... he did not want the people of "The Way" to be seen as rebels or revolutionaries for the sake of preserving the Gospel.
A revolt would have been crushed by Rome and it would have been worse for all Christians.. so I think Peter is advising this for the greater good of all believers for that time period.
The yoke of slavery could not be overthrown over night...I think Peter being wise knew this.
Today, I agree we should not allow anyone be harshly beaten, we live in a different time.