Search results

It is indeed a bait question. You have a pattern of them, carefully choosing your words and responding critically to everyone. You demonstrate a poor understanding of Scripture, in the same way the Pharisees did. You have much to learn.

Are you saying Moses was later than Samuel? You might want to check that. With respect to you, that's pretty speculative.

Um, no. Eve believed the lie of the serpent, but she was called “deceived”, not “sinner”.

Where is the biblical text to support this, and how does it explain Noah cursing Canaan rather than Ham?

None of them. The word is "canon".

It is used as a verb, but in the context of man and woman, it has only one meaning.

Adam was not commanded to sweat, but told that he would. He was not commanded to fight thorns and thistles, but told that he would. Similarly, Eve was not commanded to be under subjection to her husband, but rather told that he would rule over her. Indeed, why would God phrase a command to one...

The verse you cited is a statement of certain consequence, not a command. Compare it with the following verses stated to Adam. It would be silly for Paul to appeal to that to support the idea that all women should be in submission to all men.

If you are a bot, you fail on the “intelligence” part.

No, but you will have to answer to God for your refusal.

Answer my question first.

If you refuse to explain the doctrine that is correct, their condemnation is on your head.

*Which* doctrine, specifically? Responding with any variation of “all doctrine“ is not acceptable.

You have some silly ideas.

Actually, it isn’t. The error that permeates Intersection’s posts is the implicit conflation of “all” into the idea of “correct doctrine”. In reality, people can believe some correct doctrines and some incorrect doctrines at the same time… even knowingly. They are in process… as we all are...

Save your energy and sanity. This guy isn’t going to change his tune and isn’t worth losing your peace.

It is not a role in the Church in the same way that elder, deacon, pastor, and teacher are roles.

We have one priest in the NT Church: Jesus Christ. “Priest” as a human role in the Church does not exist.

Thanks, sincerely. Some of the details warrant follow-up, but the theme is consistent with things I have read.

There's no issue in outing a specific individual who has committed a crime (though better to wait until he is convicted), but slandering every person in a category because of the sin of a few is prejudicial, unjust, and possibly illegal.