Search results

I made a mistake in giving thumbs up to this message. There is no such thing as unconditional election because it robs us of our free will to choose or reject God's free offer of eternal salvation. God has chosen Christ to be the elect to save the world (Ps 89:3, Isa 42:1, 43:10, 49:7, Mat...

Name a couple of my views that offend you and that are removed from the gospel... IN YOUR VIEW. 1) 2) 3)

Prove me wrong. By the way, I don't quote other people or copy from links. If I did, I would provide the info. Another lie about me.

I simply exegete the scriptures according to the scriptures, not according to man, but I have to admit I have read extensively the beliefs of the Dispensational jargon and it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Preterism, on the other hand, tends to put everything in the past without...

I have never claimed to be a preterist. Did you give me that label because my beliefs don't fit yours? ;););)

I don't obey the law, I obey a Person. :love:

[[ Futurism does not teach that something is "always one step beyond our grasp". So that is just a straw man. }} The straw argument comes from you, but you just don't know yet. But I'm sure you will let me know when the future is here, [[The relevance of the Bible is for today. The Gospel is...

So far you have demanded much from me as if you were my interrogator, yet you have not divulged how in the world can you believe in something that is always one step beyond our grasp? Do you believe God gave us a completely irrelevant book for the last 2,000 years which continuously and...

That's ridiculous. We all know that John wrote Revelation by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Are you looking for silly excuses? Revelation 1:1–2 (NASB95) 1 "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must soon take place; and He sent...

I'm not going to explain my beliefs to someone who is not interested in understanding the principles that I use to believe that Revelation is not about a book of the end-times, but a book that presents us with a whole new picture of the supremacy of Christ over all the powers of hell and the...

I wished I could help you to think clearer and according to what the scriptures reveal to us. For example, if the book of Revelation was written for an intergalactic time of the future, we would have a problem because we would've had to admit that God gave us a book that has been irrelevant for...

I believe I already gave you scriptures that made my point very clearly. If you wish to disregard what I said, I'm not going to read what you posted.

Sorry, the 412-year-old KJV uses a term that doesn't read correctly in modern English. The wording is "a little while", a "short time", "the time is near", etc. Revelation 1:1 (NASB95) 1 "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must...

Before I can respond to the scriptures you provided, I would like to know on what basis do you believe that the book of Revelation was written for the future? Do you know what kind of implications this speculative belief brings to the table? Out of the top of my head, I can bring at least three...

I was waiting for you to mention that Jesus is the seed of Abraham while we are an expression and a result of God'sd seed in us.

Please provide related scriptures to give it the correct context. Thanks,

The mark of the beast is a 2,000-year account of what John saw in his vision. For me to say that Revelation was written for an intergalactic generation of the future, it would only serve to deny the historical context of the scriptures.

The Times of the Gentiles ended when Jerusalem was destroyed and the city was burned to the ground. That's the correct context of the scriptures. There is no reason to believe that modern and false Israel is somehow a continuation of what God judged as Jesus predicted in Mat. 23:34-39. The...

Thank you, you have exposed some of the "KJV only cult" narrative that is used to attack the rest of good scholarly translations. Good work!

So, what's your point in saying all that? You seem to have fallen short in your conclusion. ;)