Search results

Um, no. Firstly, the term "satan" doesn't appear in either passage in any of the translations, so your point is completely without foundation. Secondly, the term, "Lucifer" in the KJV is not correct. It is a transliteration from the Latin Vulgate, not a translation from the Hebrew. Thirdly...

Sadly, many people argue that the English translation trumps the Greek word.

Pureness, is English your first language? There's no shame if it isn't. Either way, may the Lord bless you.

Then, the next time you are asked for scriptural support for your assertions, you will provide it without waffling or throwing shade? We'll see.

Actually, I can, because Luke, and Mark were not apostles. Neither were the authors of Joshua, Job, Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles. Neither was Solomon, David, or Moses. Neither were any of the OT prophets. You should think before you post.

Your gross mishandling of Scripture is the root of the problem.

Your claim is utterly ridiculous. If that were true, you would have no trouble showing Scripture that supports your assertions.

Uh huh. :ROFL::ROFL::LOL::LOL::ROFL::ROFL:

Perhaps you should check to whom my post was addressed, instead of attempting to make yourself look more foolish.

BAHAHAHAHAHA... you are doing a fine job of demonstrating your ignorance. :ROFL::ROFL::ROFL:

Perhaps in some contexts, but not this one. When it comes to scriptural interpretation, opinions have absolutely no evidentiary value. When your assertions are inconsistent with Scripture (as many of them are), the only place they need to be taken is to the trash bin. More judging the heart...

You can either answer my questions, or not, as you choose. I won't be answering stupid questions.

If you truly believe that, there is no point in trying to correct you. The only one who can still reach your stubborn, arrogant, self-righteous heart of stone is the Holy Spirit Himself.

How hypocritical of you. And how childish of you.

It is unwise to use words that you don't understand. So that she can... continue learning? No. She is to learn so that she can teach. But you would sit under a male pastor, who has nobody over him to ensure he isn't leading the congregation astray? Maybe that explains a few things....

It's not a lie unless she knew it to be false, which I doubt. If it's not true, then why are you so bothered?

What is the cultural context into which Paul wrote that verse? What is the specific situation? What is the textual context?

No, your threads aren't bothering me at all. I'm just suggesting that you slow down and seek to discuss. Throwing somewhat-critical Scripture at everyone will probably earn you a reputation as unpleasant. :)

Hi... You have started four threads in twenty minutes, and none of them offers anything but quotations of critical verses taken out of context. Do you have anything edifying to share? Would you like to discuss anything?

You keep saying this, but have offered nothing but wind in support of it. It is nothing but your uninformed opinion.