Search results

  1. Dino246

    Our new relationship to the law.

    This post demonstrates your inflated view of yourself and your disparagement of others. You keep assuming that others are spiritually inferior to you. That’s unmitigated c**p. I have never before encountered someone who is simultaneously so wrong on so many levels and who also thinks they are...
  2. Dino246

    Our new relationship to the law.

    You keep displaying your inflated self-importance. Why?
  3. Dino246

    Our new relationship to the law.

    This is not true. This user puts on Ignore anyone who disagrees with him.
  4. Dino246

    Our new relationship to the law.

    FYI, the moderator does request that we report heresy.
  5. Dino246

    Earth Age

    They don’t, but human interpretation of them does.
  6. Dino246

    Where did King James only originate?

    Clearly, you do not understand what the gift of "the word of wisdom" is, and you are both immature and self-important for mentioning it and thinking that anyone should pay attention to you because of it. I have addressed these matters more thoroughly in another thread.
  7. Dino246

    Where did King James only originate?

    You just aren't getting it. The evidence that you claim does not even remotely support your assertion. NO amount of repetition will make it support your claim.
  8. Dino246

    Our new relationship to the law.

    As we are unable to assess the reliability of the "prophet", we can only judge by fruit. I'll be straight with you: the fruit of your "ministry" here is not that of the Holy Spirit. There is far too much of your ego involved. I haven't seen anything from you that I would describe as a "word of...
  9. Dino246

    Our new relationship to the law.

    Given that you have demonstrated that you have so much to learn, you should not be trying to teach at all.
  10. Dino246

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    Well folks, there we have it.
  11. Dino246

    Where did King James only originate?

    Your claim is this: "Because the translation accurately portrays Christ where many of the modern translations remain faulty in their execution of the language." The "evidence" you cited does not even remotely match your claim, let alone support it. There is no "faulty execution of the...
  12. Dino246

    Where did King James only originate?

    1666 has nothing to do with 666. The latter, biblically, is the number of a man. Every other instance of the number is irrelevant.
  13. Dino246

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    Do you even understand the concept of taking responsibility for your actions? YOU are causing the strife here.
  14. Dino246

    Where did King James only originate?

    Dodge and weave, dodge and weave. Once again, you can’t support your assertion with EVIDENCE.
  15. Dino246

    A Double Standard in Christianity?

    You are clearly implying that I’m a liar, but your accusation is incoherent, as I did not use the word, “spouse”. Perhaps you’d care to explain.
  16. Dino246

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    More stubbornness. If you would stop making an issue of it, the strife would go away. That you can’t grasp that is telling.
  17. Dino246

    A Double Standard in Christianity?

    No, you can’t, as I have made clear to you. You are stubbornly unteachable.
  18. Dino246

    Where did King James only originate?

    It looks like you are quoting some source without citing it, which is plagiarism. Also, you have not presented anything in the way of evidence to support your assertions.