Search results

You are playing silly games. ‘Light’ and ‘the sun’ are related but distinct things.

If the head covering is a symbol of a husband's authority over his wife, then it is not relevant for an unmarried woman. If it is a symbol of Christ's authority, then it is not of the husband's authority. The problem with the latter is that the passage is clearly addressing a marital...

Lol... kinds, not kings. Not sure how I managed to fat-finger that one. So much for my proofreading habits.

Implying a comparison between yourself and Jesus is arrogant. Implying an insult is cowardly. If it bothers you when people tell you that the doctrine you promote is not biblically sound, maybe you should consider why.

If you think my comment is incorrect, you are welcome to offer an alternative. Simply throwing doubt on it is disingenuous.

Revelation 22:5 answers that. :)

For the record, the best translation of the passage is "the love of money is a root of all kings of evil."

The only reason that money "has turned you into" anything is that you have allowed it to have power in your life that God never intended it to have. It's a tool, just like a hammer, which in the same way can be used for good or for evil. The hammer itself can do nothing.

We will also be free from the need for food. Is food therefore evil? No. Your "logic" is really wacky.

Any other groundless assumptions you care to make? Insulting me isn't going to get you anything good.

I don't hate you at all, but I think you're quite thoroughly wrong, and I'm not afraid to tell you so.

There's the problem: it's your doctrine, not biblical doctrine.

The ignorance of your post is astounding. Firstly, the term, "satan" means "accuser". Secondly, money is completely neutral; it is the use of money that may be evil. You clearly haven't read Revelation anywhere near closely enough. Please, go and take your ignorant fearmongering with you.

Light was created on the first day; the sun was created on the fourth day. ;)

Refraction and reflection poke a fatal pinhole in your hypothesis.

There's the problem, in bold.

The belief that the earth is spherical does not logically lead to any of these conclusions.

I am simply respecting the other person's choice. I am unaware of any Scripture that would support his position in contradiction to my position, and he has not provided any, so there's no point in continuing.

Because the "angels who sinned" did so by having relations with human women. Paul may have been making reference to that.

Okay, feel free to ignore my post in the other thread. I didn't forget anything. There was darkness (evening) before God created light (morning). 1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the...