Search results

Thanks for the response. I understand your irritation... many Christians and pastors are insensitive and narrow-minded when it comes to single believers. They inadvertently ostracize singles because, I suspect, they have forgotten their own pre-marriage experience and haven't a clue what to do...

I'm sensing that you have a personal stake in this issue... given the number of threads on the subject started by you in recent weeks. Maybe, instead of dancing around it, just share what's going on for you (though perhaps not in this forum).

Um, no. Reincarnation is a Buddhist belief, not a biblical concept. John came in the spirit and power of Elijah, and he was the fulfillment of the prophecy, but he was not "the reincarnated Elijah"... at all.

Your underhanded insult is noted. Too bad you don't have the integrity to say it openly.

I see no point in entertaining Calvinistic straw man arguments.

We found Elvis!

I see I have a new fan. I wonder if @Lorielhn will step up and provide some rationale for the multiple dislikes.

The traditions about which Paul was writing were those taught to him by Christ and which he in turn taught to others in his travels. They are what we know now as the substance of his letters. So, to answer your latter question directly, the traditions are part of what we now call Scripture.

"Their falling down causes them to worship"? Really? Perhaps you'd care to rethink that. The elders' correct apprehension of the very presence of God caused them to worship. Your assertion regarding English grammar is simply incorrect. "And" in this case does not indicate causation, but only...

Um, no, Romans 1:19 and 21 do not tell us that Paul is writing about believers. Here are verses 18 through 21: 18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God...

Where is your evidence for that?

Did you do any textual study on these verses, or did you just react to what you think is a problematic translation?

I see that, despite your claim to reading the KJV an hour every day, you haven't learned proper English grammar by doing so.

So physical actions consistent with spiritual worship are forbidden? Fanaticism indeed....

Two verses do not a "demolishment" make. Don't be ridiculous.

Learn history. Think before you post. Try not to embarrass yourself. smh...

Dispensationalist codswollop.

@John146's list of "proofs" in favour of the KJV, with response 1. Contains no errors FALSE 2. Perfect time in history SUBJECTIVE 3. Fulfillment of God's promise NO MORE SO THAN ANY MODERN TRANSLATION 4. Manuscript evidence DITTO 5. The fruit it has produced SUBJECTIVE 6...

There was no such thing.