Search results

Accusing someone of lying is accusing them of knowingly presenting a false statement as true (or a true statement as false). That word "knowingly" is critical. Where someone presents a false statement as true but does not know their statement is actually false is not lying, but merely deceived...

SOME mental illness is likely the result of generational sin. I would reject the idea that all of it is.

Wow... did it ever occur to you that, even if Jesus could have "seen" all the kingdoms of the world from one vantage point, they didn't all exist at the same time in history?

I see we have another contender for the "Most Ignorant of Basic Physics" award. Please, do your homework before posting dogmatic assertions, lest you embarrass yourself.

Already addressed. You are assuming too much and ignoring even more. Your problem is therefore fallacious.

That depends entirely on the direction each travels, and for how long. If they travel in different directions, B will never catch A. If the same direction, but A lands within an hour, again, B will never catch it. :)

Given that the word "firmament" is a transliteration of a Latin word which was translated from a Hebrew word, we should be cautious rather than dogmatic regarding its meaning. Trace the etymology of the terms and their meanings. You may be surprised at what you find. ;)

You haven't seen the spherical earth, therefore you don't believe it. Hypocrisy yet again.

Uh huh. Foundations can be temporal as well as physical. The text doesn't specify which. Where is that in Scripture? It's not impossible. The problem is that you don't understand basic physics. There you go adding to Scripture again. By the way, it's "an" ordained circuit, not "a". That...

Nothing there about water seeking its own level. You must be adding to Scripture again.

As your alleged “law” is not stated in Scripture anywhere, we can ignore your repeated bleating about it.

It's quite sad that you refuse to deal with real-world evidence and instead attribute all disagreement with your erroneous views to the deception of the enemy. Frankly, you demonstrate far more proclivity to deception than those you so freely decry.

Wrong. The evidence is visible in a glass or test tube of water. The water curves up at the edges. This is called the meniscus. It's a well-known and understood physical phenomenon... which refutes your claim completely. Wrong again. The surface level of the oceans varies cyclically due to...

Read my post again, this time with your eyes open. You're only extending your hypocrisy by trying to prove me wrong with the Greek (which you haven't), when you reject the Hebrew in Job.

My inner jury is still out on the question of gravity being fundamentally electromagnetic. Whether it is or not is largely irrelevant because in most contexts, the Newtonian model of attractant mass works. The EM model must have significant explanatory power to account for all the phenomena...

Lying? You are way too quick to judge, which sadly does not surprise me in the least. Here is the text from the NIV: Jesus replied, “The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. 35 But those who are considered worthy of taking part in the age to come and in the resurrection from the...

Your hypocrisy is shameful... as is your ignorance of basic physics.

Again, some translations erroneously use "angels" in Job, but the correct translation is "sons of God"... in all three passages. Luke 20:34-36 says nothing about "sons of God". Jude does not use the phrase "sons of God", nor does 2 Peter 2:4-5. Neither directly references Genesis 6. Luke...

Again, none of which is Scripture stating that the Earth is flat.

None of which is Scripture stating that the Earth is flat.