Search results

Many things are unproveable by Scripture but are true nonetheless. Use the appropriate tool for the job.

I can provide supporting evidence. Whether you consider that evidence "proof" is up to you. "In general, the person or party making an argument has the burden of proof to justify it (whether they argue that something is true or false). This applies, in particular, to situations where someone...

That’s called a ‘burden of proof reversal’. The one who first makes a claim bears the responsibility for proving it. ;)

Him. Everybody needs Him. The Holy Spirit is a Person, not a thing.

Yes, clarity is helpful. ;)

Depending on the consistency of your punctuation with your intended meaning, this could be interpreted as... "To be honest, I'm struggling;" or "Honesty is a struggle for me." Perhaps you'd care to clarify?

We don't trust your manipulated images.

Let’s agree first on which are the “uncorrupted original manuscripts”.

Nor do we read anything about it being flat. Wrong; the fall of Adam is the groundwork of modern infidelity.

You can make any assertions you like, but until you back them up with EVIDENCE, you are only spouting hot air. Don't bother merely presenting the KJV and the NIV; show the underlying Greek text and demonstrate where the NIV fails to present the deity of Christ where it is presented in the Greek.

That's really simple: We all experience the effects and manifestations of the Fall. Autism is one such effect. You were indeed created in God's image, but that doesn't mean you are perfect, any more than it means anyone else is perfect. Further, it is not solidly defensible that the physical...

The correct rendering is not necessarily the one that best fits a particular theological viewpoint (right or wrong), but rather the one that best renders the original-language text into English. Theology is a derivation from the text, not the other way around.

The KJV has been the most commonly available translation; that does not make it the standard against which others should be judged. There are two meanings of "standard" in use here; don't conflate them.

I suggest that you do your homework before making such assertions.

“Changes” in relation to what? The original text, or the KJV? The KJV is not the standard by which other English translations should be judged.

There is a difference between getting paid for your work, which the Bible commands, and getting a reward for your good deeds. Conflate the two and you confuse the issues.

That’s the stupidest thing I’ve read all month.

There’s the rub: right understanding of Scripture depends on not taking every word literally.

Sometimes your posts are merely wrong. Sometimes they are partly wrong. Sometimes, as with this one, they cross the line into ignorant stupidity.