Search results

Well I guess we can be confident that if people would stick with the KJV we would never have aberrant and heretical groups starting. Wait…

I find it odd that other KJV-only folks aren’t jumping in to support you on this. Perhaps yours is the anomaly view.

Already you are changing the text. I don’t see that, and the text says nothing about “our very existence”. Your position makes no sense in light of the three words, “from this generation”. Mine does. There is nothing whatsoever in the text about the written form of the text… not even a hint...

I provided the Scripture already for this. You haven’t responded.

Your choice of words is disturbing. Who is the "You" here? Anyone who disagrees with you? It looks like you're becoming paranoid about this.

I haven't seen any reason to think your assertion has any validity. I don't think for a second that KJV-only folks are, in general, "stupid and intellectually retarded". However, some of the arguments (ideas) touted in favour of KJV-onlyism are stupid, and ideas are fair game for criticism.

Psalm 12:6 is not a prophecy.

Um, you missed his point.

Often I carefully don't address the content of a post because the fallacies therein make the content irrelevant. There is no point in responding otherwise to fallacious arguments. I also strongly suspect that you see a very small percentage of my posts.

I have posted "I win!" several times when someone announces that they are putting me on Ignore. If I sought to have people do that, I would indeed be a troll, at least in that.

No, it isn't. It's a simple metaphor, which I have explained. You have either ignored or rejected the plain sense and made up a fantasy. 1 Help, Lord; for the godly man ceaseth; for the faithful fail from among the children of men. The subject of this verse is "the godly man" and "the...

I understand the sentiment. My post was primarily facetious, but it underscores something about this site: you can put another poster on 'Ignore' but that doesn't stop 'me' from responding further to 'their' posts.

I didn't do the translating, so your accusation is baseless. Your translation is still wrong, because the Hebrew text for Psalm 23:1 says "YHVH", not "Jehovah". There's another, more accurate word for "commendable reference": corruption. "Receive Graces"? Are you a Catholic?

Please use the "Reply" button at lower right. Otherwise, we have no clear idea to whom you are responding.

Read Strong's definition again. See that "fig."? That's short for figuratively. And then explain how idolatry is less severe a sin than adultery/prostitution. If it were evil for Hosea to marry a prostitute, why do you think it is less evil for him to marry an idolater? Evil is evil, period...

For some reason, despite my best efforts to tell you plainly, you don't accept the fact that you don't know jack about me, so stop making asinine assumptions. Either quote my exact words, or keep your comments to yourself. As I've said before, I don't buy into the dispensational hogwash. Don't...

Hosea 1:2 KJV The beginning of the word of the Lord by Hosea. And the Lord said to Hosea, Go, take unto thee a wife of whoredoms and children of whoredoms: for the land hath committed great whoredom, departing from the Lord. "whoredoms", Strong's Dictionary: 2183 (Hebrew form), zanuwn...

Here's the first part of John 3 from the original 1611 KJV: Note the two sidenotes saying, "or, from above" for "again" (againe). The modern printings of the KJV exclude these marginal notes, giving an artificial sense of certainty.

Biased speculation at best, ridiculous cultic delusion at worst.

There is certainly something to that. It would be great to see Jesus get the kind of attention and fervour that the average American college football team garners. Ultimately, only the Lord can judge each person's behaviour, because only He can see the heart.