Search results

I came to my certainty regarding the Trinity without 1 John 5:7.

Fixed it for you. I'm not interested at all in your speculations.

Could DNA evolve? That's a loaded question. Let's start by defining the key term: evolve. To the average scientist, it means simply, "change over time". In any discussion about origins, Earth's age, the proper way to interpret Genesis 1-2, or any number of other contexts, it means, "simple...

Speculation as to what might have happened in the 1700's does not add anything to this discussion.

The burden of proof is always on the person making the claim. Pathetic victim mentality wrapped up in self-righteousness.

You have not demonstrated even once that there is a significant doctrine that is "evident" in the KJV that cannot be constructed from a decent modern translation. Your use of "hate" demonstrates again that you enjoy sensationalism, and aren't interested in respectful, truth-based dialogue...

There is a big difference between someone who uses the KJV because it's the only thing available, and someone who uses the KJV because they have all kinds (and qualities) of reasons for considering every other translation inferior.

The more likely it is that a specific answer to a given question will cause you to end the relationship, the earlier in the relationship you should ask it. Don't waste your time, and don't waste theirs either.

You have ignored the first definition in each case. I can only conclude that you aren't interested in seeing your error. I've presented plenty of evidence; I'm done with this topic.

I'm not going to discuss this verse further in this thread, because it's off-topic. It is generally considered yelling; your opinion on the matter is irrelevant.There is no need to capitalize an entire sentence. Any capitalization (outside standard grammar) in the KJV is a function of the...

Your stubbornness is profound. Why where the ten northern tribes scattered among the nations? Adultery/prostitution, or idolatry? A one-word answer will suffice.

Red herring. In other words, "I can't respond adequately to your post so I'm going to throw up some vaguely-relevant accusatory question to get the attention off me and my non-response." Ain't gonna fly, dude.

I am well aware of the actual meaning and correct interpretation of this verse, but thanks. It's not necessary to yell. You erroneously define the first instance of the term by the third instead of letting each be defined by its own context. What is a normal consequence of sexual intercourse...

God treats idolatry as the more serious sin... by far. The Northern ten tribes weren't scattered to the nations because of physical adultery.

There will be many who disagree loudly with you, and a few, like myself, who quietly agree.

Do your freaking homework and don't dodge the obvious with red herrings.

Irrelevant. Completely.

This one verse should be enough to put your whole argument out to pasture. Isaiah 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things. Further, you have not responded to my post 1218, wherein I posted the following: Hosea 1:2 KJV The...

There is nothing wrong with rejecting a specific word (which is what Westcott did here) while embracing the underlying principle. He says plainly (if you understand how to parse the punctuation), "at present, I find the presumption in favour of the absolute truth of Holy Scripture overwhelming."...

Exactly… regardless of the translation used.