Search results

Then you should look into the beginning of this teaching in Topeka and Azusa. Indeed today you can find many different directions and meanings of this teachings through the splittings and the charismatic movements of the last century. Even on CC. I dont know any charismatic ore pentecostal who...

Have all the gift of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interprete? 1. Cor.12:30 The teaching that all who are baptised with the Holy Spirit and as sign for this is the speaking in tongues says with other words. If you dont speak in tongues you are not baptised with the Holy Spirit. This...

To drive an car is unbiblical, too. Your Argumentation shows that you have no idea about virus sickness and how to fight against it/ protect others. Sorry to say. If you wait till a virus shows the symptoms in somebody for to isolate him. In this time he can infect 100 ore more people without...

This was an one time witness for the jews thatvthe Gospel is also for the gentiles, as Petet told this later to the Jerusalem believers out of the jews, and not an doctrine which was taught to other believers.

This it was in Pauls time. Today people claime that this is the sign that someone is baptised with the Holy Spirit. There is no biblical foundation for this teaching.

Thats right. For that he gave the gift to discern the Spirits.

It is in deed a fact that this was in former times, as you correct statet in Acts, but it was not taught and repeatet in the bible. The events you mentioned were to show that Jesus came not along for the jews, but for everybody.

Again, i am not speaking about tongues. But about the Man made doctrine that speaking in tongues is a sign that someone is baptised/filled with the Holy Spirit.

This is simply not true. If you look to the corinthian church, you cant claime that their believers Was filled with the Holy Spirit. Also nor Paul ore any other writer of the NT taught that filling with the Holy Spirit is combined/ ore seen in speaking in tongues. And in 1. COR 12.30 Paul made...

This is what I noticed in my church, too. Gospel, without to tell the alternative of beeing saved. That means why someone should become Christian when he dont know that he is lost in eternity without Christ.

I dont speak about tongues, maby you should read on what i have anwered.

Well, thats your understanding. I cant find this description in Acts 2 at pentecost. But in Spiritism.

When you read my post, you must have read that I am was not talking from today, but from the beginning of the pentecostal movement. Today you can find kind of this behaviours in charismatic movements. They call it a little smoothier. Holy laughing, holy Rolling, holy rest in the spirit.

Thats right our father in heaven is the ultimativ authority, not our understanding ore our teaching. You miss to proof that your teaching was taught to the Christians during the apostles time.

Google it :-)

Paul said in Romans 8,16: The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God. So we dont need to speak in tongues for to know that we have the Holy Spirit. When we received Him we know it. And as I said. Your teaching is eisegese, but not to find taught in...

This is false teaching. F.e. if this would be true. Then the first person with speaking in tongues in australia would be a woman in 1909. Ergo no believer is to found in australia before 1909. As I said, according your claime. Before Topeka, you cant find this practise nor in the Holyness...

What?

O sorry, i have dictonarys and concordances and also NT word by word translation greec/german. And long time ago i atteded bible school, so i am not depend on Google. Ore you expect that i have learned in school old greec? Also its not my mother language.

Nope, your claime that receiving the Holy Spirit produces the gift of speaking in tongues is a man made false doctrine. This is reportet in Act as sign for the jews, that Jesus came also for gentiles, samaritians and disciples of John the Baptist. thats right. But it was never taught to any...