The old covenant is entirely based on obedience, while the new is based on faith.
Galatians 3:10 For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse, as it is written: “Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law.”
Hebrews 10: 1 The law is...
No, "tithing" is not "a guide to give at least 10%" at all. It is a requirement under the Mosaic Law to bring a tenth of your crops and every tenth animal to the temple (tabernacle); there is no "give" at all (double entendre intended). As Christians are not under the Mosaic Law, there is no...
Gee... I wonder why Jesus didn't add "Today" every other time He said, "I tell you the truth".
Maybe because it was part of the second clause, not the first.
Things in the federal government here in Canada are broken. There are good people on the front lines in some areas, but the decisions from the top are terrible, and they have a habit of trickling down and affecting everything.
Daniel 2:34-34 and 2:44-45 refer to Jesus' first coming. He set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor shall it be left to another people... but it is not a kingdom of this world, as He Himself later stated.
As promised...
The above post from stilllearning covers the major points, though I would cite Michael Heiser rather than Bart Ehrman. ;)
The most obvious example is Genesis 19:24, where we have a visible Yahweh on Earth calling down fire from Yahweh in heaven.
I can't locate my copy of...
This is incorrect. Jesus subjected Himself to the guidance of the Holy Spirit within Him. As a man He was temporarily and intentionally less capable than the Father. See Philippians 2:5b-8.
Again, temporarily.
Only temporarily. Jesus the man did not have full knowledge nor full power.
Take...
This isn't about me, or what I claim. You claim that the 1900 Cambridge edition is "the perfect word of God", so your supporting arguments must meet a much higher standard.
The fact is that both Erasmus and the KJV translators engaged in the same practice; comparing available texts in the effort to determine what the text said. That the term came later is completely irrelevant.
The colour orange existed long before there was a word in English for it.
Do you, or do you not, hold to a translation of the Bible that has been through several revisions, wherein there were corrections made to the Bible?
In case you haven't realized it, your arguments are destroying your position.