Search results

We know when Paul wrote his epistles, that’s not what’s being brought into question. I was using those as examples. Christ has power over Satan and by that same power we as individuals came overcome. Since Satan has not been bound up yet, the Earth is still his dominion. Just look at how this...

My thoughts pure, but they were spoiled My strength was mighty, but it brought weakness My heart aimed for good, but my quiver had no arrows My heart filled with love, but my chambers sat empty My intent brought peace, but my actions caused war My ears heard wisdom, but my eyes fixed on...

Again think scripture is being misapplied.

If you think it’s bad here, you should see the comments on YouTube about this.

Where would be the evidence of the resurrection of the dead in 70 AD? Mark 13: 26-27 gives a descriptive account of the taking of the elect. Also in 2 Timothy 2:17 Paul’s talks about Hymenaeus and Philetus false teaching of the resurrection. As for the Satan no longer being the ruler of the...

Frank Turek whom I admire takes the preterism position as well. The Jewish-Roman Wars are well documented and there is no indication that anything supernatural had occurred. Israel couldn’t have been Babylon as its description is not in conjunction with chapter 17 of Revelation. Israel is show...

In all honesty I really think you’re misapplying scripture here to foment a certain belief or doctrine. Much of what you are using is out of context.

I just don’t see this type of replacement theology as being just. There are too many detailed descriptions that had not been recorded or fulfilled. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come. Matthew 24:14...

My question would be, where is the evidence of this? It’s seems not long after the Church was founded, problems arose. Almost 2000 years later we have many different Churches(denominations) that have perverted and strayed from Christ’s teachings. Could it be that the Olivet Discourse was...

I have a difficult time accepting this as well. Not only that, but wouldn’t there have been overwhelming evidence of such an event? God’s return.

I noticed some apologists use this as Jesus words were true that some would not see death until His second coming. The 40 prothetic terminology. I can see how that is applicable, but there other things that aren’t included such as; worldly events, the entire world would see His second coming...

We still have fun though.

How do you explain logic and rationality if we are just biological anomalies reacting to chemical impulses?

It’s a troll account

Isn’t that more part of the oral tradition(Talmud).

The Apocrypha. James a quoted the book of Enoch. One of the reasons they were never officially canonized was due to their unreliability and somewhat contradictions to actual scripture.

Unless you live off the grid, it’s not really applicable.

It’s probably someone who does.

Posts a controversial OP. Speaks somewhat eloquently and then goes to curb side slang and mockery. I’ve been on enough forums to take notice.