Search results

PS, re: "We do the same thing...if someone says they worked in the office all day, 'all day' does not normally mean 24 hours." But wouldn't you think that at least a part of a day was involved? Likewise, if someone says they worked in the office all day and night wouldn't you expect that at...

Perhaps someone new visiting this topic may know of examples.

This topic seems to be based on the idea that beliefs can be consciously chosen. But since this is not possible, what is a person suppose to do?

BibleLoverBill, re: "It is not for a different topic!!! It disproves the Roman Catholic forced traditions." Which is of no concern for this particular topic. This topic is concerned with 1 issue and only 1 issue: 1. The Messiah said that He would be three days and three nights in the "heart...

BibleLoverBill, re: "I saw this in a Facebook posting: A clear explanation of the Passion week events--" Thanks, but I'm afraid it deals with issues for a different topic.

Word_Swordsman, re: "Your answer is in those 45 pages." I wonder if you might point out the number of the post which gave examples where a daytime or a night time was forecast or said to be involved with an event when no part of a daytime or no part of a night time could have occurred?

Endoscopy, re: "Going backwards Sabbath (rose late afternoon), Friday, Thursday, crucified Wednesday." That's an issue for a different topic. I just don't understand why you, garee, piroma, cv5, and others want to keep hijacking this topic instead of starting your own topic to discuss your...

Endoscopy, re: "The fact that Jesus stated quite explicitly that the sign of him being the Messiah was the sign of Jonah...That is a very explicit prophecy and attempting to refute the 3 days and 3 nights is by extension attempting to refute who Jesus is." That's an issue for a different...

Endoscopy, re: "You keep trying to state the topic of the thread," Three days and three nights ", is not for the time in the tomb. How idtiotic is that??" I've told you at least 2 times that the topic title and OP were poorly conceived with regard to the intent of the topic. Unfortunately...

garee, re: "I was replying to piroma..." So I wonder why you quoted me if you were replying to piroma? re: "He/She said; (If so, then this topic is not drected to you. It's directed to those who think "the heart of the earth" is referring to the tomb." That was my comment, not piroma's...

garee, re: "The three days is not in reference to the tomb... That's an issue for a different topic. Perhaps you could start one.

piroma, I think you're saying that there is no missing night when you count the night that the Messiah was arrested. If so, then this topic is not drected to you. It's directed to those who think "the heart of the earth" is referring to the tomb.

piroma, re: "Preparation day is Friday isn't it ? how did then Jesus die on Thursday?" How do you account for the lack of a third night?

re: "In post #846 change 'that' to 'that's'." OK, maybe three times is a charm: In post #846, change "That" to "That's".

piroma, This topic is concerned with one thing and only one thing: 1. The Messiah said that He would be three days and three nights in the "heart of the earth" 2. There are some who think that the crucifixion took place on the 6th day of the week with the resurrection taking place on the 1st...

In post #846 change "that" to "that's".

piroma, I still don't see what your comments have to do with this topic. Please explain why you think they do.

Word_Swords man, re: "...Jesus had to die before sunset, on that Thursday." That an issue for a different topic.

piroma, re: "passage saying - morning and suddenly - the day" I still don't see what that has to do with this topic.

Perhaps someone new visiting this topic may know of examples.