Concave Hollow Earth Theory
- Thread starter kinda
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I actually thought you were kidding. lol Someone might of mention the Androids in a video about the Maui fires, that I watched. Something about his buddy worked on it and verified this, but it's hardly evidence.
There is actually a Ted Talk, Concave Hollow Earth on youtube, that has poor sound quality, that sorta scratches the surface on this underground world, but that's something I don't believe in. I believe we line in a Concave Hollow Earth, not the Heliocentric Model Earth is concave.
I was kidding.
I'm not so sure about Zuckerberg though..
He always reminds me as something other than human. I can't really be sure that he's an Android, not am I sure about his humanity. Lol
There have been some interesting interviews from the testimony of someone who spent time underground having something to do what bases.
I'll listen to the Ted Talk shortly.
I'm not concerned with the shape or way the earth is originally designed, but I do stop to think that the globalists and gts are making underground cities and bases for a reason.
There are several infamous ones in our state. One is open for paid tours. It was designed for old guys from DC.
"In terms of depth below the surface, the Kola Superdeep Borehole SG-3 retains the world record at 12,262 metres (40,230 ft) reached in 1989 and is still the deepest artificial point on Earth."So, I believe the Concave Hollow Earth Theory deserves a serious look. It may go against mainstream science, but so does the Creation story of Genesis.
Edmond Halley is one of the pioneers of the Concave Earth belief, he dedicated his life to science. He has a very interesting story, I think it would benefit people who are interested in science, to learn more about him.
A brief story of Edmond Halley from what I got from the net. Please don't take my word for it, since I didn't really fact check all this stuff. Edmond's dad was a successful business man selling soap and funded his son in his pursuits of science. I believe Halley's Comet was named after Edmond, he also funded Sir Isaac Newton, so his writings could be published and examined. Seems like a legit dude to me!
Edmon Halley was lead to believe that the earth is concave and hollow from his experiments. I'm sure there is more to his story, but that's a brief back ground on one of the pioneers of the Concave Earth Theory.
"To acquire knowledge, one must study; but to acquire wisdom, one must observe".
https://lonestar1776.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/concave-earth-for-dummies/
This is a quote from the website I found to be very interesting. I'm far from an rocket scientist, so my understanding of the Concave earth is elementary at best. I have an open mind and believe it's more than possible, that this theory is true. Please have a look at this website, it may stir up the inner scientist in you.
https://lonestar1776.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/concave-earth-for-dummies/
So when does the earth become hollow?
We will have to hide in the basement, or find an underground parking garage, to hide in, if there is bombs being dropped.
Modern engineering marvel.
I did not know that.
Well, it depends how someone views the earth, but in case you missed it, here is a quick model of the concave hollow earth.
https://rumble.com/v4rhxj9-hollow-statinary-earth-globetard-tells-flattards-water-curves-upward.html?e9s=src_v1_s,src_v1_s_o&sci=694f5173-d576-43c8-95e2-13f802ce1ecd
I really believe we live inside a concave hollow earth, instead of convex earth.
I thought of another experiment any pilot could do. Commercial airplanes cruise at about 27,000. feet above earth, or about 5 miles in altitude. Naturally if one travels about 200 miles in the state of a relatively flat state like Florida, you should have about 5 miles of curvature either up of down by the shape of the earth, depending on what you believe the shape is. In a concave earth, the earth should be up hill 5 miles. Planes have a very slight pitch at 2 degrees, so in about 200 miles, that equals 5 miles.
If the earth was convex, a plane should have a pitch of negative 2 degrees to maintain proper altitude for 200 miles.
Another experiment would be to record time, acceleration, pitch, and speed to reach 27,000 feet above the earth, after take off for a flight. This should be a relatively easy way to measure curvature of the earth. I think the very fact, a plane doesn't pitch down after reaching a 27,000 feet of altitude is a dead give away the earth isn't convex.
"A commercial airplane at 27,000 feet is typically flying with a very slight nose-up pitch (maybe 2-3 degrees), known as the deck angle, to generate lift, not directly related to its altitude or the steepness of ascent/descent, which varies, but this "uphill" feeling is normal for cruising at high altitudes where the plane maintains level flight with a gentle upward angle relative to the airflow. "
I really believe we live inside a concave hollow earth, instead of convex earth.
I thought of another experiment any pilot could do. Commercial airplanes cruise at about 27,000. feet above earth, or about 5 miles in altitude. Naturally if one travels about 200 miles in the state of a relatively flat state like Florida, you should have about 5 miles of curvature either up of down by the shape of the earth, depending on what you believe the shape is. In a concave earth, the earth should be up hill 5 miles. Planes have a very slight pitch at 2 degrees, so in about 200 miles, that equals 5 miles.
If the earth was convex, a plane should have a pitch of negative 2 degrees to maintain proper altitude for 200 miles.
Another experiment would be to record time, acceleration, pitch, and speed to reach 27,000 feet above the earth, after take off for a flight. This should be a relatively easy way to measure curvature of the earth. I think the very fact, a plane doesn't pitch down after reaching a 27,000 feet of altitude is a dead give away the earth isn't convex.
"A commercial airplane at 27,000 feet is typically flying with a very slight nose-up pitch (maybe 2-3 degrees), known as the deck angle, to generate lift, not directly related to its altitude or the steepness of ascent/descent, which varies, but this "uphill" feeling is normal for cruising at high altitudes where the plane maintains level flight with a gentle upward angle relative to the airflow. "
The definition of altitude is height above sea level. Pilots maintain height above sea level either manually or by autopilot settings. You do not need to put the nose down to change altitude. Simply changing the control surfaces of the wing adjusts the amount of lift and so corrects for the earth's curvature. The height of flight relative to the size of the earth means that only minor corrections are required.
Fair enough, but do you really believe that this is a honest answer for what I posted?
I posted a video with the ocean rising above the horizon and a test almost any pilot could conduct to prove shape of the earth. If we were both being honest, I don't think your explanation solves the points I was making. Planes typically have about a positive 3 degree pitch when cruising and about negative 3 degree pitch when descending. I asked the pilot on the last flight I was on, what the pitch was when he was ascending from 15,000 feet, he said 5 degrees. I think might of been put on a watch list for asking to many questions on a flight.
Anyways, as crazy as it sounds, I think the concave hollow earth is a fact, rather than a theory. Planes should be cruising at a negative 3 pitch, if the earth was convex. Can you at least agree, that what I'm saying is logical?
No, your conclusion is based on a misunderstanding of the principles of flight. Something I've overlooked is that the atmosphere moves with the earth itself. The atmosphere is tied to the surface of the earth by gravity. The aircraft is tied to the curvature of the earth as a result. This video explains it better than i can.
https://encrypted-vtbn3.gstatic.com...tdwP2D_Zi4rjjlozIQFHJE-WZakQ54kZvQqlxPz5rM1uC
@GaryA
O.k., I'm not gonna promote a flat earth thread ever, if possible, but from a previous thread you mentioned planes work in a flat earth, giving you a chance to defend this defenseless idea, of planes working in flat earth, which is laughable, like my run on sentence. lol
So, I know Professor Dave is a little arrogant and annoying, but he does have a background in science. I think he still makes mistakes. Like I said, sometimes flat earthers have good points, planes should be angling down, if the earth is convex. Professor Dave belittles that point.
Anyways, explain the flight path in Santiago, Chile to Sydney, Australia, how that flight works on a flat earth model? I already think anything you say is gonna be a deflection, or a distraction, but willing to let you humor me on any answer...
Destroying Flat Earth Without Using Science - Part 3: Airplanes
O.k., I'm not gonna promote a flat earth thread ever, if possible, but from a previous thread you mentioned planes work in a flat earth, giving you a chance to defend this defenseless idea, of planes working in flat earth, which is laughable, like my run on sentence. lol
So, I know Professor Dave is a little arrogant and annoying, but he does have a background in science. I think he still makes mistakes. Like I said, sometimes flat earthers have good points, planes should be angling down, if the earth is convex. Professor Dave belittles that point.
Anyways, explain the flight path in Santiago, Chile to Sydney, Australia, how that flight works on a flat earth model? I already think anything you say is gonna be a deflection, or a distraction, but willing to let you humor me on any answer...
Destroying Flat Earth Without Using Science - Part 3: Airplanes
"Sunlight is bending upwards. The clouds are illuminated from the bottom up."
https://lonestar1776.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/concave-earth-for-dummies/
To me this is just the final nail in the coffin.