Concave Hollow Earth Theory

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Possibly, but would of missed out on, how swimming airplanes explain convex earth's rotation. I will have to save that bit for later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cameron143
kinda said:
Possibly, but would of missed out on, how swimming airplanes explain convex earth's rotation. I will have to save that bit for later.
Click to expand...
You may want to adjust your vocabulary some too...maybe instead of swimming airplanes you might go with submarine.
 
Cameron143 said:
You may want to adjust your vocabulary some too...maybe instead of swimming airplanes you might go with submarine.
Click to expand...

Yes, the yellow submarine argument, only Heliocentric believers would say such a thing. They even have a song for it!
 
I won't being doing a thesis after all, since it would be a disservice to Cellular Cosmogony. Professor U.G. Morrow did extensive work and I will not bother trying to do a lessor work than his. I will do an experiment to verify his work, like any rational person would do, if he believed in something.

Cellular Cosmogony can be found on Amazon for purchase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poinsetta

Flat earthers keep posting videos proving the Concave Hollow Earth. Great job! From Canada even.

If earth was convex, the bottom 600 feet would be below the horizon, not unless you believe in the inversion layer (mirage).

If the earth was concave, the water would be rising about 600 feet from point to point, and possible the earth as well, depending on layout.

The Toronto Needle is suppose to be 1,800 feet high. The smaller buildings below the Needle shouldn't be visible, if it wasn't for this mirage that keeps happening, or Concave Hollow Earth. You make the call!

explore-cn-tower%20.jpg
 
kinda said:
To be honest, I was hoping for better. It's 2023, we should have video of earth traveling through the heavens. Ever consider this?

I know you think this case is closed, but you have a biased video of the image. There is always different views at looking at things.

Right off the bat, I honestly couldn't tell you what that picture is of. We can assume, it's from space looking at the earth, but can we trust anything that comes from the U.S.? I personally think, the U.S. was taken over in 1913. Anyways, I will get to the point...

By the way, thanks for giving it your best shot.

Here is just one way, of undermining the image.

Ever hear of optical illusions? Sometimes are minds play tricks on us.




Do have proof that anyone can verify on their own? You know do a test and come to a conclusion, rather than relying on a 3rd party for evidence? There should be some test, that everyone can confirm?

I will show my caveman test soon.
Click to expand...

Quick reminder: September 5th is rapidly approaching.

Anyways, I actually asked a professional surveyor to survey a lake for me, even offered to pay him, and he said, he was to busy. He thought I was a flat earther, but assured, I'm not. I told him I believe the earth is concave and wanted to test the curvature and see it with my own eyes.

He told me, "even if you are successful, no one will believe you". Well, I'm sure there were other people in the past, that no one believed, that were eventually proven correct later on. I just might be ahead of the curve, or sadly mistaken. Either way, I have most of the material I need to do my experiment. Might need to pick a few things at Walmart, do the initial assessment, than watch science at work.

 
Cameron143 said:
I'm not offering proof. But I'm not propagating a theory. I just think if a theory doesn't offer explanations for recurring events, no amount of evidence concerning shape will be convincing.
Differences in shape, though, necessitates alternative explanations for phenomena. If a theory only has partial explanations, it would stand to reason that it would be more difficult to believe.
As far as my curiosity, I was interested how a concave hollow earth would explain certain seemingly naturally occurring events.
Click to expand...

I think our discussion has derailed the other thread. So, we can continue here. .


"I'm not offering proof. But I'm not propagating a theory. I just think if a theory doesn't offer explanations for recurring events, no amount of evidence concerning shape will be convincing. "

It doesn't. Have you read a few pages of this thread? There is a book called, The Cellular Cosmogony. Nothing in the book touches on recurring events???

"Differences in shape, though, necessitates alternative explanations for phenomena. If a theory only has partial explanations, it would stand to reason that it would be more difficult to believe."

Well said?!?! You would have to define partial explanations, examples, and etc. If your saying, since I can't tell you how volcanoes work, than you are having a hard time believing in concave hollow earth. Then...

THE POINT IS WELL TAKEN!

"As far as my curiosity, I was interested how a concave hollow earth would explain certain seemingly naturally occurring events."

That is correct. I asked for proof in what you thought made sense, and didn't get any. So, is this a tie?

Not sure how repeating the same question about volcanoes and earthquakes is so important, especially when you have no proof to show. I find it hypocritical, especially when I stated, I don't think it's possible to know for sure the questions you are asking. It's childish. If this is one of your comedy routines, I think I missed it. :)
 
kinda said:
I think our discussion has derailed the other thread. So, we can continue here. .


"I'm not offering proof. But I'm not propagating a theory. I just think if a theory doesn't offer explanations for recurring events, no amount of evidence concerning shape will be convincing. "

It doesn't. Have you read a few pages of this thread? There is a book called, The Cellular Cosmogony. Nothing in the book touches on recurring events???

"Differences in shape, though, necessitates alternative explanations for phenomena. If a theory only has partial explanations, it would stand to reason that it would be more difficult to believe."

Well said?!?! You would have to define partial explanations, examples, and etc. If your saying, since I can't tell you how volcanoes work, than you are having a hard time believing in concave hollow earth. Then...

THE POINT IS WELL TAKEN!

"As far as my curiosity, I was interested how a concave hollow earth would explain certain seemingly naturally occurring events."

That is correct. I asked for proof in what you thought made sense, and didn't get any. So, is this a tie?

Not sure how repeating the same question about volcanoes and earthquakes is so important, especially when you have no proof to show. I find it hypocritical, especially when I stated, I don't think it's possible to know for sure the questions you are asking. It's childish. If this is one of your comedy routines, I think I missed it. :)
Click to expand...
My original post was an earnest desire to see if there was an explanation for questions I have concerning concave and hollow earth theory. Not receiving any answers I offered advice about what, in my opinion, would help in garnering interest in any theory. That is, having plausible explanations for frequently occurring phenomena. I'm actually a little disappointed some of my questions couldn't be answered. So whatever interest I had in learning more about the subject has been frustrated. But my intention to learn more was genuine. By not answering my questions I know nothing more than when we started. I was never looking for proof. I was looking for reasonable explanations. Why would anyone want to invest time in a theory that offers no explanations for everyday occurrences?
I was merely trying to decide how extensive the reasoning and how plausible the explanations are behind the theory to make a determination if the theory is worth investing time in.
So, I'll ask one more time, does the theory offer explanations--not proof-- about such things as earthquakes and volcanic activity? I'm not familiar with the scope of explanation concave hollow earth theory has developed. I thought you were. Thus, my questions.
 
Cameron143 said:
So, I'll ask one more time, does the theory offer explanations--not proof-- about such things as earthquakes and volcanic activity? I'm not familiar with the scope of explanation concave hollow earth theory has developed. I thought you were. Thus, my questions.
Click to expand...


So, I will re-post my answer one more time.............Hopefully, you can forgive me for being redundant.


kinda said:
Why can't concave hollow earth theory, share plate tectonics?

I will keep your question in the back burner, when I have more time, or stumble across a different reason, I will try to remember to post it. Tesla believed he could create a earthquake machine and some speculate the U.S. has the technology now to do so.

I still have to do my survey experiment, to confirm what others have already proved. Can you remind me in 3 months?
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cameron143
So, to further prove the earth is a concave sphere.....

3-concave-earth-enlarged.png


concave-earth-real1c.png


More details about moon phases between 21 minutes and 30 seconds, to 32 minutes and 36 seconds.


 
So, the video above is probably the most in depth video of concave hollow earth.

Topics include...

Cell Earth - Seasons
Cell Earth - Up Is In, Down Is Out
Cell Earth - The Glass Sky
Cell Earth - FE vs CE
Cell Earth - Perspective
Cell Earth - Seasons
Cell Earth - Light Doesn't Travel In A Straight Line
Cell Earth - Solar Eclipse
Cell Earth - The Horizon
Cell Earth - The Octahedron
Cell Earth - Lunar Phases
Cell Earth - Lunar Eclipse
Cell Earth - Milky Way
Cell Earth - Meteors
Cell Earth - Sprites & Elves
Cell Earth - Negative Refraction
Cell Earth - Solar Time
Cell Earth - Coriolis Effect
Cell Earth - GPS
Cell Earth - The Father And The Sun
Cell Earth - Comets
Cell Earth - The Great Deluge
Cell Earth - Why Is The Sky Blue
Cell Earth - Airplane Halos
Cell Earth - Red Clouds
Cell Earth - Double Rainbows
Cell Earth - Ocean Tides
Cell Earth - Rainbows & Sundogs
Cell Earth - Megacryometeors
Cell Earth - Gegenschein
Cell Earth - Crystal Field Theory
Cell Earth - The Selenelion
Cell Earth - The Luxembourg Effect
Cell Earth - The Rectilineator
Cell Earth - Octahedron Evidence
Cell Earth - Rapid Fire (Compilation)
Cell Earth - NEOWISE Comet
Cell Earth - Looking For The Curve
Cell Earth - Centrifugal Divergence Gravity
Cell Earth - Airplanes
Cell Earth - Inverted World
Cell Earth - Welcome To Cellular Cosmology
Cell Earth - The Midnight Sun
 
I mean do people really believe the earth travels 67,000 mph? Just curious. That's pretty fast.

Is there any video of the earth flying through space yet? I would like to see that. Really!
 
So, I tried to do my survey experiment today, but it turns out my telephoto lens is not strong enough. I also will have to figure what weather pattern is best, to photograph long distance. So, will try and rent a high powered camera, to do this experiment.

One person came up to me and asked what I was doing, it was a long discussion, and actually thought Concave Hollow Earth was interesting. Imagine that! Hmmm.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back