Is The battle of Psalm 83 near?
- Thread starter TheLordIsMyRedeemer
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I think this testimony is evidence that there is overwhelming and incontrovertible proof that the IDF attacked the ship, and the US did not come to their aid and covered it up.
What is doesn't answer is why.
The fact that the President of the US recalled planes sent to their rescue indicates this was a political maneuver and not from the Navy, meaning the commander who sent that ship into harms way was not aware of what was about to happen.
But one wonders why the IDF (this can't be a rogue commander since it involved multiple planes from reconnaissance to fighter jets and it involved three ships, so it included IDF intelligence, Air force and Navy and since LBJ was involved we can imagine that it also involved the Prime Minister of Israel) and Israeli political leaders would do this.
In any trial you don't condemn someone before hearing from them first. We have heard from the Prosecutor, now I'd like to hear from the defense attorney.
What is doesn't answer is why.
The fact that the President of the US recalled planes sent to their rescue indicates this was a political maneuver and not from the Navy, meaning the commander who sent that ship into harms way was not aware of what was about to happen.
But one wonders why the IDF (this can't be a rogue commander since it involved multiple planes from reconnaissance to fighter jets and it involved three ships, so it included IDF intelligence, Air force and Navy and since LBJ was involved we can imagine that it also involved the Prime Minister of Israel) and Israeli political leaders would do this.
In any trial you don't condemn someone before hearing from them first. We have heard from the Prosecutor, now I'd like to hear from the defense attorney.
-
1
- Show all
Ok fair. But to conclude the argument, I think the simplest explanation is the most accurate reason why. Israel wanted USA to enter into the war with the Arabs...and the public typically won't sign off on war unless we are attacked. More specifically, an act of war must be declared by congress.
Recall pearl harbor. USA didn't enter the world war until Japan attack USA. The president had intel it was about to happen and sat on it then too. Need to get the public outraged and ready for war.
Compare it to what's going on now between Israel and Iran. Our own intelligence dept and the independent IAEA say that there's no evidence iran was restarting their nuke weapons program...but that's all you hear from Israel; been hearing that they're just 1 year away from doing it...for 40 years now.
So they sneek attack Iran while in the middle of negotiations with USA, hitting their power plants...and crime against international law because of the potential meltdown by the way.
Iran starts firing back. Israel needs The USA to enter this conflict to win. It's reported that US diplomat to Israel, Mike Huckabee, was in a shouting match with Netanyahu in Israel because he wouldn't allow Americans to flee back to USA before the heavy attacking started. Why not? Everyone else got to leave who wanted to leave.
When 9/11 happened, we received intel from Israel that Iraq was somehow involved and had WMDs. USA went to war and toppled saddam but never found any WMDs...but "coincidentally" Iraq is no longer a problem for Israel.
TL;DR - why? So that USA can be Israel's attack dog.
Recall pearl harbor. USA didn't enter the world war until Japan attack USA. The president had intel it was about to happen and sat on it then too. Need to get the public outraged and ready for war.
Compare it to what's going on now between Israel and Iran. Our own intelligence dept and the independent IAEA say that there's no evidence iran was restarting their nuke weapons program...but that's all you hear from Israel; been hearing that they're just 1 year away from doing it...for 40 years now.
So they sneek attack Iran while in the middle of negotiations with USA, hitting their power plants...and crime against international law because of the potential meltdown by the way.
Iran starts firing back. Israel needs The USA to enter this conflict to win. It's reported that US diplomat to Israel, Mike Huckabee, was in a shouting match with Netanyahu in Israel because he wouldn't allow Americans to flee back to USA before the heavy attacking started. Why not? Everyone else got to leave who wanted to leave.
When 9/11 happened, we received intel from Israel that Iraq was somehow involved and had WMDs. USA went to war and toppled saddam but never found any WMDs...but "coincidentally" Iraq is no longer a problem for Israel.
TL;DR - why? So that USA can be Israel's attack dog.
-
1
- Show all
1. Hamas, Hezbollah and Houthis are all proxies of Iran. That means Iran has been actively involved in supplying them with weapons that they have fired at Israel long before this attack.
2. Iran was given 60 days to negotiate concerning putting a stop to their weapons program. If they didn't have one it would have been a simple thing to invite inspectors in from the UN and demonstrate that. Instead they were in violation of a treaty for nuclear inspections.
3. Iran had enriched enough Uranium for ten nuclear bombs, that is not a US report or an Israeli report, that is from the UN which is heavily influenced by Islamic nations. Experts tell us that enriching Uranium to that extent has no purpose for power plants and can only be used in bombs. They are playing with semantics, are they using tools to tighten the bolts on a nuclear bomb? No. But are they assembling all the pieces like hypersonic missiles and enriched Uranium? yes.
So no, there is no correlation at all between Pearl Harbor and this latest attack.
2. Iran was given 60 days to negotiate concerning putting a stop to their weapons program. If they didn't have one it would have been a simple thing to invite inspectors in from the UN and demonstrate that. Instead they were in violation of a treaty for nuclear inspections.
3. Iran had enriched enough Uranium for ten nuclear bombs, that is not a US report or an Israeli report, that is from the UN which is heavily influenced by Islamic nations. Experts tell us that enriching Uranium to that extent has no purpose for power plants and can only be used in bombs. They are playing with semantics, are they using tools to tighten the bolts on a nuclear bomb? No. But are they assembling all the pieces like hypersonic missiles and enriched Uranium? yes.
So no, there is no correlation at all between Pearl Harbor and this latest attack.