Woman first....what do you think?

Speaking of checking, this is at least the second time that you have called this female member "brother." Do you ever bother to check people's profiles?

You know (you're about to), you really do have a major problem in relation to how you talk to women (you have other problems as well). Seeing how you love 1 Timothy 2:11-15 so much (even though you don't know what it actually says), let me introduce you to something else that Paul said to Timothy in that same epistle.

1Ti 5:1
Rebuke not an elder, but intreat him as a father; and the younger men as brethren;
1Ti 5:2
The elder women as mothers; the younger as sisters, with all purity.

Not only are you not anywhere even remotely close to being in the position of authority that Timothy was in, but you also have not been intreating/entreating the older women here (again, this member who you keep on calling "brother" is a SISTER...try reading people's profiles) as mothers, nor have you been intreating/entreating the younger women here as sisters with all purity. Quite frankly, you've been an arrogant (and ignorant) jerk. Are you planning on repenting of the same anytime soon, or will you continue to play the hypocrite yourself?

Back to 1 Timothy 2:11-15

1Ti 2:11
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
1Ti 2:12
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
1Ti 2:13
For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
1Ti 2:14
And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
1Ti 2:15
Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

In context, which apparently means nothing at all to you, Paul was speaking of a husband and wife relationship. Hence his reference to Adam and Eve who, in case you have not heard, were the first husband and wife. This same Paul called marital relationships, of which Adam's and Eve's was the first, "a great mystery" in that human marriage was ordained by God to mirror the covenant between Christ and his church.

Eph 5:32
This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
Eph 5:33
Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

In other words, in the same manner in which Christ sacrificially laid his own life down for the church, a husband is to sacrificially lay his own life down for his wife. At the same time, in the same manner in which the church is to reverence Christ, a wife is to reverence HER OWN husband...and not wet-behind-the-ears wannabe "teachers" like you. This is the context of what Paul wrote in 1 Timothy 2:11-15, and it is the same context of what he wrote elsewhere. Like here, for example.

1Co 14:34
Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
1Co 14:35
And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

Here, as in 1 Timothy 2:11-15, Paul was talking about proper order IN THE CHURCHES. In case nobody has yet informed you of this, this forum is not a church. Women are free to speak here, and no "novice" like you is going to stop them from doing so.

Also, in context, which, again, apparently means nothing at all to you, "your women" were the wives who were instructed to ask their husbands at home whatever they might have wanted to inquire about IN THE CHURCHES.

Is Snackersmom (or any of the other females here that you have been speaking arrogantly, ignorantly, disrespectfully, and hypocritically to) your wife? Last I checked, you are both single. Are you IN CHURCH? No. You are on a Christian forum where both men and women are free to share scriptures.

Anyhow, Paul's intended point, which you have sorely missed, is that the marital relationship was designed by God to represent the relationship between Christ and his church, and this is why he did not wives usurping authority over the own husbands in a church setting.

Now, let's see how you behave going forward.

I accidentally left out the word "want" in my initial response. Sorry.

Your post was wanting.

It has already been stated why.
You even acknowledge it here.

This post is giving off Mr. Roboto vibes.

Hi JMH, I don't mind answering this if you are sure you are ready for a mature conversation. But that means both sides have to listen to each other and try to understand the others' point of view.

It would mean no name-calling or petty insults, so If you disagree you need to communicate that respectfully. Deal? 🤝

and who first saw Peter when angels released him from prison...

What is your question and thought process behind this post? I literally have no idea what you are implying here.

Another guy a woman says she's happy to see, but leaves him outside. Hmmm.