Non human entities already living among us ?

Though the reptilians are also a deadly and confirmed non-human entity, let's take note that most of the deadliest historical recorded non-human entities from the past three centuries to kill and eat humans are of the cat kind.

One thing I was taught by my pastor was already mentioned. I have heard other preachers confirm this and eventually taught it myself. It's hard to disprove that negative if that's all you know. It wasn't the traditional plain view of those who take it literally to prove the cross kinds offspring theory wrong. It was the cross kind mating theorists to prove their case.

I was one to believe what I was first taught by those I highly respected because they had spent so much time in the word than this kid. I simply repeated what I was told with the "sons of God" the only use being angels and Adam. However, there were no other children of God in the OT because I was also taught dispensationalism which had a whole new set of variables that depended upon a certain set of teachings that a saved person would not come to on their own just reading the Bible for themselves. All that to say that I was wrong all those years about that topic. I even went to Colonial R.B. Theimes conferences where I took careful notes while he taught.

You already pointed to one verse that disproves my old theory. Here's one I found in the OLD testament. I didn't have to read far either. It's in Deuteronomy chapter 32.

18Of the Rock that begat thee thou art unmindful, and hast forgotten God that formed thee.
19And when the LORD saw it, he abhorred them, because of the provoking of his sons, and of his daughters.

Am I mistaken here? The Lord, the Rock begat thee reminds me of Jesus ' rebuke of the pharisee teacher of the law in John 3.

"Know ye not that ye must be born again. Apparently there was a Father and son relationship with those in the Old testament. I was taught that new birth did not occur until the NT, but my pastor was wrong, so I was too.

Here we get further clarity of the fact that unregenerate sons and daughters of men can become sons and daughters of the LORD.

That leads me to think that the fair daughters of men in Genesis 6:2 were humans as were the sons of God. I've heard all kinds of theories about crossing kinds and that they did Not reproduce after their own kind as God Himself stated over and over again.
Ellen G. White, an 7th Day Adventist whos writings carry the same authority of scripture as the Bible according to that false religion. She taught this.
Considering, her trances and unbiblical writings, that really isn't convincing that certain kinds of animals inter bred. Likewise, the angels are not humans and we have no indication of them reproducing other than occult sources and scary movies like Rosemary's baby. Angel kind and man kind do not mix.

Plus the sons of God theory is disproven by Old Testament scriptures.

What dark humor. 😳😄
The hunter was crying because the poor leopard had porcupine quills in it's feet. Like the poor kitty had to resort to eating human flesh because his paws were too sore to eat porcupines. Oh how sad. Lol

Who is identified in the passage?

Like I said, the only references to "son of God" in the bible are direct creations of God - Adam, the angels, and Christians (born again of God's Holy Spirit). Your reference (2 Samuel 7:14), was not describing that Solomon was God's son, as was described of Adam and the angels. That He would become so later perhaps, similar to the process of Christians in the New Testament - we become sons of God when we are born again.

What rules? And, who came up with them?

I can agree 100% with #2, #3, and #4 - however, #1 - which is stated with way-too-general wording - may include man-derived rules that have in fact brought about much error.

A lot of modern-day "hermeneutics" - very often trusted blindly and taught without question based on the 'authority' of well-known men - are the very reason for so much error in biblical interpretation today.

Inasmuch as you are suggesting that #2, #3, and #4 are part of these "rules of Bible interpretation" - well and good - but, what are the rest of these rules?

Is there a list somewhere that defines the "rules of Bible interpretation" for the whole world? Or, does every other group have their own rules?

(It may be that I agree with the "rules of Bible interpretation" you are referring to; however, the wording of #1 above is way-too-general for me to know just exactly what it represents. Got a list?)

Perhaps the Reptilians are more real and literal rather than so metaphorical and etheric. Perhaps the legendary reptile beasts of legend that the high Christian saints and heroes of old are as a matter of historical fact recorded as encountering and in some instances slaying or in some means prevailing over in the name of Jesus.

It's general on purpose. Many of my posts are lengthier than many want to read and I don't have time to teach a Bible college class on a forum. Some may use modern PeeWee Hermanutics. I use Bible interpretation provided by the Bible. Read it enough with the Holy Spirit directing and you'll pick them up sooner or later. Seek and ye shall find...

No doubt about it.
AND it's not some grainy Bigfoot footage either.😄

A dog is a non-human entity. So is a cat. Every living creature that is not human is a non-human entity.

Time to call the Men In Black.

I don't see anything wrong with 2-4 bring rules of interpretation. Some would and others would not include those.
I was in a hurry to pay my phone bill in my last post. I finally had my meal break for the day and might be able to start to answer your remark about#1. The I have to rest. I've had 2 hrs sleep in 24 hours and have a little more to do before bed.

I was being a little factitious about teaching a college course. I believe that every Christian should learn them after reading their Bible through from cover to cover. They shouldn't be exclusive to some seminary student. The first pastor I had disagreed and used the KISS principle, while at Bible institute I said, the rest of the church needs to learn this!
After that I learned a couple more on my own.

1. Ask yourself, who is doing the speaking?
The Bible is true, but it records lies as well as truth and does so accurately.
When Satan speaks, consider the source. He manipulates, tempts and lies.
However, if Jesus teaches, we can believe His words.
Jesus is the way, the truth and the life....
John 14 :6

Truth is stranger than fiction, meet Henry.

Did you set the video to start near the end? I like the music, and I recognized it as Hildegard von Bingen's.

While the Reptilian non-humanoid creatures appear to be just brute and ferocious monsters that are outright the enemies of humanity, the cat kind is more nuanced as a powerful non-human entity that best fits the OP of a theory of a non-human entity at the head of a new age cult to control the world.

Perhaps the cats are trying to hide their complicitness, they are the primary non-human entity that both successfully infiltrated and arguably hijacked high human technology of the internet many years ago.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PcqkphR5iMY

Yes, I did see that mentioned somewhere... that the most viewed thing online is kitty cat vids...

It is clear we lost the invasion as their war propaganda against us shows them gloating over us in their complete physical as well as spiritual domination of the earth.

That is amazing! A real living dinosaur!
At first I was impressed with the lifelike statue of the Beast because there's no way the zoo would let someone that close in an enclosure.
Saltwater Crocs are usually aggressive and unpredictable.
Then he moved😄🐊

In the 90s I went to St Augustine Florida and got to see Gomek. I thought his plaque said he was around 19 feet long at the time. Up close it was hard to believe how much girth he had. I was 10-15 ' from him through plexiglass.
Here's an older video of him.