ChatGPT is an Open Source AI
- Thread starter ZNP
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Wow, you can see the strategy of AI taking over the world in this video, but it is hidden.
So at first he tells you how AI can flood the internet with content, most of which you don't want to see. But it would become excellent at fashioning "click bait" titles and videos. As a result people would need AI to help filter out the information so you only see what you are interested in. Once you have done that you have made AI the gatekeeper that controls what you can and cannot see. AI becomes the "Chief of Staff". In the Whitehouse the Chief of Staff is often the most powerful position because no one gets to talk to the president without first getting through him. If AI controls what you can and cannot see it becomes the arbiter of truth for you.
So at first he tells you how AI can flood the internet with content, most of which you don't want to see. But it would become excellent at fashioning "click bait" titles and videos. As a result people would need AI to help filter out the information so you only see what you are interested in. Once you have done that you have made AI the gatekeeper that controls what you can and cannot see. AI becomes the "Chief of Staff". In the Whitehouse the Chief of Staff is often the most powerful position because no one gets to talk to the president without first getting through him. If AI controls what you can and cannot see it becomes the arbiter of truth for you.
How You Will Lose Your Job To AI
This assumes AGI arrives in 2030. We have predictions that it will arrive in 2026 and some are even saying as early as 2024. I suspect they will have a prototype in 2024 but won't have the network capability for widespread rollout for at least another 12 months. So the writing will be on the wall, and for fortune 500 companies that can afford the computers and chips necessary they will be factoring it into hiring policies in 2024 and by June of 2025 you might as well forget getting a job that AI can do in the next 12 months.
If the predictions are correct with AGI arriving in 2026, will Fortune 500 companies be hiring people in June of 2024 if they will need to lay them off in 2026? Let's see, I suspect we'll see hiring freezes in 2024. Already we are seeing layoffs at Tesla and Amazon.com of 10-25% of the workforce. If you have layoffs then you can probably assume there is also a hiring freeze.
1. Cashiers (3 million people)
2. Warehouse workers (870,000)
3. Assembly line workers (213,000)
4. Fast food workers (3.6 million)
5. Telemarketers (45,000)
6. Customer service reps (2.9 million)
7. Retail Sales (15.7 million)
8. Data entry clerk (300,000)
9. Medical technicians (60,000)
10. Financial Data analytics (273,000)
11. Drivers (4.4 million)
31 million jobs that can be replaced this year. That is 20% of our current workforce! This only scratches the surface. We have computers that diagnose computer problems so that mechanics now merely replace parts. It used to be that diagnosing the problem was half the job, so the computers are replacing half of the mechanics (that would be another 300,000). They want to go to a digital currency which would eliminate the need for bank tellers, another 300,000 jobs. We also have 10 million construction workers. If we start having 3d printers making houses, and if we have a huge glut in commercial real estate we might see a huge decline in construction workers, maybe another 2 million jobs.
There are also 6.7 million people working in the public school system nationwide. I suspect that with AI tools like Khanmigo which can tutor your child in any subject for $35 a year that we will see a nice increase in homeschool. So that could very easily be another 600,000 jobs in the very near future. We are talking about the depth of the great depression unemployment and that could be in the next 12 months.
What a choice. Homeschool your kids and give them a real education or teach them how to change their gender, why all white people are evil, why blacks are victims, hatred of Jews - anything except what they need to get through life.
If teachers were educators and not social engineers, I'd have a little more sympathy for them. I'm sure glad that I did not go down that career path. I love teaching. But the world system is hell bent on churning out illiterates who have no idea about reason, logic and common sense. At that, the system is highly effective.
If teachers were educators and not social engineers, I'd have a little more sympathy for them. I'm sure glad that I did not go down that career path. I love teaching. But the world system is hell bent on churning out illiterates who have no idea about reason, logic and common sense. At that, the system is highly effective.
-
1
- Show all
It's only recently that fusion has been able to generate more power than it takes to create fusion in the first place. And this does not take into account the energy required to power the lasers or whatever is used to generate fusion. Then the energy produced has to be converted to something useful such as steam to drive a turbine generator.
Losses in the system will be substantial, so the fusion reaction will have to a gain far more in excess of unity. The reaction has to be sustained for years to make it worthwhile. Current technology is not even close.
If construction of a fusion power station started now, it would be some years before it was producing useful power. It takes 5-7 years to construct a fission reactor. Brand new technology? Just getting building approvals could take years. Sure, a useful system is closer now than previously. I won't be holding my breath for one.
Losses in the system will be substantial, so the fusion reaction will have to a gain far more in excess of unity. The reaction has to be sustained for years to make it worthwhile. Current technology is not even close.
If construction of a fusion power station started now, it would be some years before it was producing useful power. It takes 5-7 years to construct a fission reactor. Brand new technology? Just getting building approvals could take years. Sure, a useful system is closer now than previously. I won't be holding my breath for one.
Revelation gives us a picture of the Beast system rising out of the sea. It has not "risen". So if it is going to take 6 more years for this beast system to fully arrive it indicates that what we are shown in Revelation is a picture prior to that time.
Yes, Fusion does seem to be part of the equation, but another part of the equation is telling the rest of the world to stop using the reliable sources of power so that they will be able to use it for AI. That is part of the motivation behind the Green new deal and the UN's SDGs and their "Pact for the Future"
Yes, Fusion does seem to be part of the equation, but another part of the equation is telling the rest of the world to stop using the reliable sources of power so that they will be able to use it for AI. That is part of the motivation behind the Green new deal and the UN's SDGs and their "Pact for the Future"
2012 is when they learned how Nvidia was able to make the development of AI take off. What you are seeing now with AI took 12 years to get to this level. It has been advancing exponentially ever since. It took 4 years to come up with AlphaGo, a program that taught itself how to play Go in a matter of months to the point that it developed entirely new strategies and defeated the world champion. They can now train AI to do anything in a hours or perhaps a week. They let it study Youtube videos, or watch someone else do the task, or even they can simulate tasks creating more data for this stuff to study.
It is simple equation now, build bigger computers and your AI becomes more powerful.
But because the AI is often millions of lines of code and they now have AI that can code they can use AI to edit the code they have making the AI work better. So by editing and rewriting code they can make AI better.
But the sad reality is that any job that can be defined and described by Youtube can be taught to AI and robots in a matter of weeks. Tesla robots cost about 120k, but the plan is to lease them for 30k a year. These robots can work 4 shifts a week, so it is like getting a full time worker for 7.5k a year, no benefits, no medical. If the robot needs to be serviced they come in and do that because you are leasing it.
It is simple equation now, build bigger computers and your AI becomes more powerful.
But because the AI is often millions of lines of code and they now have AI that can code they can use AI to edit the code they have making the AI work better. So by editing and rewriting code they can make AI better.
But the sad reality is that any job that can be defined and described by Youtube can be taught to AI and robots in a matter of weeks. Tesla robots cost about 120k, but the plan is to lease them for 30k a year. These robots can work 4 shifts a week, so it is like getting a full time worker for 7.5k a year, no benefits, no medical. If the robot needs to be serviced they come in and do that because you are leasing it.
*Now* They Care: 43% of Surveyed CEOs Fear AI’s Impact on Their Own Jobs
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2024...veyed-ceos-fear-ais-impact-on-their-own-jobs/
A recent report from AND Digital reveals that a significant number of UK-based CEOs are grappling with the potential threat AI poses to their own positions, while simultaneously pushing for its adoption within their organizations.
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2024...veyed-ceos-fear-ais-impact-on-their-own-jobs/
A recent report from AND Digital reveals that a significant number of UK-based CEOs are grappling with the potential threat AI poses to their own positions, while simultaneously pushing for its adoption within their organizations.
I'd never heard of ChatGPT until recently, but someone on a "Star Trek" forum used the program to analyze one of my YouTube videos, and this was the AI's response...
"The speaker reflects on their perspective of the Star Trek franchise, emphasizing their disagreement with its portrayal of human evolution and the absence of religion. They express a belief in the necessity of God's guidance for humanity's moral progress. The speaker invites respectful disagreement but discourages pointless arguments. Overall, they advocate for a more God-centered worldview. "
Personally, I think that description hit the nail right on the head. If you want to see the video yourself, and make your own call, here it is...
"The speaker reflects on their perspective of the Star Trek franchise, emphasizing their disagreement with its portrayal of human evolution and the absence of religion. They express a belief in the necessity of God's guidance for humanity's moral progress. The speaker invites respectful disagreement but discourages pointless arguments. Overall, they advocate for a more God-centered worldview. "
Personally, I think that description hit the nail right on the head. If you want to see the video yourself, and make your own call, here it is...
-
1
- Show all
Technology
Economics
UK Stands to Lose 8 Million Jobs From AI, Analysis Warns
By Irina Anghel
March 26, 2024 at 7:01 PM CDT
Updated on
March 27, 2024 at 3:40 AM CDT
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...to-lose-8-million-jobs-from-ai-analysis-warns
60% of jobs! This is for developed countries, it should be worse in undeveloped nations.
Economics
UK Stands to Lose 8 Million Jobs From AI, Analysis Warns
- IPPR says almost 60% of jobs could eventually be affected
- ‘Jobs apocalypse’ not inevitable if government takes action
By Irina Anghel
March 26, 2024 at 7:01 PM CDT
Updated on
March 27, 2024 at 3:40 AM CDT
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...to-lose-8-million-jobs-from-ai-analysis-warns
60% of jobs! This is for developed countries, it should be worse in undeveloped nations.
So obviously if they are predicting 60% of the jobs will be done by AI in 2030 it indicates that AI will be impacting hiring from now until 2030.
But let's simply look at 2030. If a Fortune 500 company replaces 60% of their workforce with AI in 2030 don't you think that will impact hiring in 2029?
Now if you are graduating with a four year degree from college in 2029 that would mean you entered college in the fall of 2025.
That means you were a senior in HS in the Spring of 2025.
So every single kid in HS now should be thinking about trying to enter the workforce when 60% of the jobs are done by AI.
Now when they say 60% of the jobs it doesn't mean 60% of jobs for new hires. What it probably means is 100% of jobs for new hires. They will still have people at the company who have been there for years and are essential or who it would be too expensive to fire.
Basically they are saying that any kid in HS today will not be able to get a job when they graduate from college in 2029 or later.
But if AI is doing 60% of the jobs couldn't it also help a HS kid or a JHS kid do a job today? Why wait? The even bigger question is why would anyone apply to college and pay 40-60k a year to go to college for the next four years when you know it will not help you get a job? In fact the real question is when does AI take 15% of the jobs because that is probably when it becomes very hard for a college graduate to get a job. Also remember, they will stop hiring a year before they reach that point.
According to this article about 20% of jobs are currently at the highest risk of being done by AI. Now it is reasonable to say that some jobs will be created. If someone leases a robot that can work for four shifts, replacing four or five workers, it is reasonable that this robot would need servicing. Perhaps like a copy machine every few months the robot communicates wirelessly to a server that it requires a part to be replaced. A technician comes out to the location, plugs in the part replacing the worn out one. So for every 1,000 hours of robot labor you will need 1 hour of technician labor.
My point is that we are about to notice that college graduates are not able to get work.
But let's simply look at 2030. If a Fortune 500 company replaces 60% of their workforce with AI in 2030 don't you think that will impact hiring in 2029?
Now if you are graduating with a four year degree from college in 2029 that would mean you entered college in the fall of 2025.
That means you were a senior in HS in the Spring of 2025.
So every single kid in HS now should be thinking about trying to enter the workforce when 60% of the jobs are done by AI.
Now when they say 60% of the jobs it doesn't mean 60% of jobs for new hires. What it probably means is 100% of jobs for new hires. They will still have people at the company who have been there for years and are essential or who it would be too expensive to fire.
Basically they are saying that any kid in HS today will not be able to get a job when they graduate from college in 2029 or later.
But if AI is doing 60% of the jobs couldn't it also help a HS kid or a JHS kid do a job today? Why wait? The even bigger question is why would anyone apply to college and pay 40-60k a year to go to college for the next four years when you know it will not help you get a job? In fact the real question is when does AI take 15% of the jobs because that is probably when it becomes very hard for a college graduate to get a job. Also remember, they will stop hiring a year before they reach that point.
According to this article about 20% of jobs are currently at the highest risk of being done by AI. Now it is reasonable to say that some jobs will be created. If someone leases a robot that can work for four shifts, replacing four or five workers, it is reasonable that this robot would need servicing. Perhaps like a copy machine every few months the robot communicates wirelessly to a server that it requires a part to be replaced. A technician comes out to the location, plugs in the part replacing the worn out one. So for every 1,000 hours of robot labor you will need 1 hour of technician labor.
My point is that we are about to notice that college graduates are not able to get work.
My predictions for the next 5 years of AI - NVIDIA, OpenAI, ASI, Project Stargate - 2024 to 2029
He is predicting that 100 million jobs will be taken by ChatGPT5. Now that is not the number of jobs taken by 3d printers, or robots, or advanced language models. We aren't talking about smart machines like self checkout stands.
But in developed countries with about 500 million jobs they expect 20% will be taken by ChatGPT. I would think 50% or more would be taken by robots, smart machines, 3d printers, language models, etc.
He is predicting that 100 million jobs will be taken by ChatGPT5. Now that is not the number of jobs taken by 3d printers, or robots, or advanced language models. We aren't talking about smart machines like self checkout stands.
But in developed countries with about 500 million jobs they expect 20% will be taken by ChatGPT. I would think 50% or more would be taken by robots, smart machines, 3d printers, language models, etc.