The Error of KJV-Onlyism

Which part of "Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: " do you not believe?

It's difficult to have a discussion with someone who knows what you mean more than you know what you mean. Since I don't possess this gift, I guess I will simply have to content myself with the knowledge that my understanding is no longer my own, but yours.
Grace and peace.

It's difficult to have a discussion with someone who knows what you mean more than you know what you mean. Since I don't possess this gift, I guess I will simply have to content myself with the knowledge that my understanding is no longer my own, but yours.
Grace and peace.

See, here's the problem with labels. People go beyond belief to opinion and are guilty of assumptions about others without ever gathering evidence.

I don't believe one can fellowship with unbelievers. What fellowship has light with darkness? But I welcome them to come and worship.

According to the Bible: To be an apostle, you had to have seen the risen Christ. Being an apostle was a part of the spiritual gifts given to the early church. So not all things are for us. They were writing Scripture. Today, we are not still writing Scripture. Unless one wants to join the ranks of Mormons, Muslims, and Catholics, the canon of the Holy Bible is closed. They also can claim to be guided by a spirit that is of truth. But they obviously are in error. Why? Because their belief is contradictory to the Bible. The same is true with Modern Scholarship. I mean really. Modern Textual Critical proponents must duck and dodge at every turn just like the Mormons and Catholics do when they are confronted with Scripture of their odd unbiblical beliefs. I mean, why would your Modern Bible try to hide stuff that makes your side look guilty?

First, 1 Timothy 6:20 changes “Science” to “Knowledge”; Various proponents of Modern Scholarship refer to Textual Criticism as a Science.

Second, in Malachi 2:12, Modern Bibles remove the words “scholar and master” in this verse. This is highly suspicious that two verses that warn us against the very foundation of their belief are removed in their Modern Bibles.

Thirdly, adding to the challenge for Textual Critics, there was a deliberate attempt to mislead by relocating the segment of 1 John 5:8, which reads, “For there are three that testify:” It's shifted to fill the gap in 1 John 5:7, creating the illusion that there's no crucial missing verse. This should immediately raise alarm bells. However, within the Textual Critic community, many might dismiss it with a casual "No cause for concern here, move along," which is worrying. If it were a trivial detail in the Bible that didn't impact doctrine, it might not be as critical, but this directly relates to a fundamental aspect of understanding God's nature.

I could keep going if you like. There is a lot more. This should not exist if the Textual Critic side was true and right.

Perhaps you should try looking for some Christian articles that defend what you believe that may say it more clearly. In the meantime, if you cannot describe the nuances of why the word “Calvinists” is an insulting term and yet “Sadducees” is not an insulting one, then you have failed to back up your belief that you currently hold to. As I said before, I have experienced a lot of conversations with Calvinists over the past 12-14 years. None of them did not say to me, “Stop calling me a Calvinist. It’s insulting.” No such thing has ever happened. Now, a small few did not prefer that label, but this is not the norm from my experience. Most do not mind that they are Calvinist and they even use that word favorably. Also, how would you identify false beliefs if not by their labels? You would have to go into some elaborate explanation that is simply not necessary. It’s like you have to hide the truth of what they are. This is the problem in your belief. You have to go into some long-winded conversation that is simply not needed. Again, your belief is not practical or in line with the Bible or reality. You are simply trying to make reality how you want it to be.

Worshipping with others is fellowship. Your belief is contradictory.

So the proof of what I mean is more easily communicated in an article than in an explanation of what I mean? This is good news. Before I thought I only believed what you say I believe. Now a bunch of people get to tell me what I believe. Awesome.

Gotcha. The church service should exclude the lost. You are brilliant.

As my question was not addressed to you, and your response is replete with irrelevant blather, I have to wonder why you bothered.

Right, like you answered everything I have put forth to you.
I answer what I can within the time constraints of my life.
I also may not always have the answer to everything, but what I do know with Scripture can be shared.

Who ever told you that such a practice was biblical, to begin with?
Look at how they evangelized in the Bible and it is a totally different approach.
Nowhere do we see in the Bible for non-believers to mingle with believers in worship.

You seem to be doing whatever you can to defend the KJV rendering as 'superior' when it is simply 'different'. Frankly, the word "peddle" makes better sense to me, but that's my opinion and I'm certain you would disagree.

Just let it go. This is not a case where the KJV is correct while the modern translations aren't.

Are you the salvation police? Do you meet for corporate worship? Do you imagine everyone there to be saved? Do you remove people from worship? Do you believe the only means of acceptable evangelization are enumerated in scripture?

Miss the point much?

Please show me in the Bible where you see unbelievers encouraged to worship alongside believers.

Which part of "Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: " do you not believe?

I will as soon as you answer my questions.

Oh, oh, oh, pick me, pick me. I know this one.