You want specific answers when the verse simply gives a general overview.
Good morning.
Do you think verse 27 of Daniel is a continuation of verse 26? If so, the "he" has to be, either Titus, the Messiah, or the Caesar of Rome. Not unless your jumping ahead 2000 years in the future and claiming it's the antichrist that's confirming some new covenant with the Jews.
Let me give you my thinking on the subject. My interpretation of Daniel 9:27 is, "And he (Jesus) shall confirm (his new covenant) with the (Jews) for (seven years): and in the (middle) of the week (3 1/2) years) he shall cause the (blood sacrifices in the Temple) and the (gift offerings) to cease,"
The Lord brought with him a new covenant, and for 3 1/2 years confirmed that covenant until he was cut off at the cross.
So, three-and-a-half years remain: enter the two witnesses of Revelation who will finish what Jesus started.
Once the Lord was put to death, buried and raised to life, from that moment forward, any sacrifices made by the Jews had no value whatsoever. He was the last sacrifice until the consummation, and the determined (destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem) had already been prophesied. And the dispersion of the Jews (now desolate) to Gentile lands had also been prophesied.
I realize it may be a new thought but give it some consideration. Verses 25 and 26 fit perfectly into that scenario, as does the revealing of the antichrist, the two witnesses and the 144,000.
Any question?