The Error of KJV-Onlyism

"None provided"? That's a lie.

I gave you one clear example from John 6:69 and you simply ignored it. Further down I also posted that Frank Logsdon REPUDIATED the NASB shortly after he helped to create it (since he was on the translation committee). Did you read that post? Logsdon said "I am in trouble with the Lord" and therefore repudiated this bible perversion. Read his testimony and wake up. He also repudiated the critical text.

As to demons being involved read that post again. The WORDS OF DEMONS when addressing Christ were put into the mouth of Peter by the modern versions. There is no way that "thou art that Christ, the Son of the Living God" can be changed to "you are the Holy One of God" (as said by unholy demons).

What is sad is your unwillingness to face the truth.

1 Corinthians 1:27
"But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;"

Do you think/believe God spoke Elizabethan English to the OT prophets, and New Testament writers?

Yes or no will do. No long-winded reply full of faulty assumptions and erroneous conclusions required.

My bad. I misread what you wrote. It is late and I am half falling asleep here. I thought you were attacking how God would never use an Elizabethan English translation as His Pure Word for today. I say this because this point has been mocked by others. I have the quote actually.

I don’t’ believe so.
I am confident in the studies I have done over the past decade on this topic.

Anyway, may God’s grace shine upon you, and good evening.

We really need to watch out for that triangular reasoning too!

Oh, so all those lies you told about me get brushed under the proverbial rug
because you have studied something else for years? Wow. Thanks for nothing.

And this is why KJ onlyists are despised by many. May God open your eyes.

Wow. Just wow. Have a great day bud.

Otherwise reasonable people turning unreasonable. Over a translation? I have heard of KJV only folks but never looked into it. It's sure an 'I' opener.

1 Thessalonians 5:

22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.

This verse is referring to 'all appearance of evil' in the sense of:

"Do not allow yourself to be in any situation whereby it even appears that you are doing something evil."

It is not specifically about your physical appearance having the resemblance of "something evil"; rather, it is about the 'appearance' of you doing something 'evil'.

And, if it is not corrupted, the overall intent of the meaning is:

"Not only should you avoid [actually] doing evil - you should avoid even the 'appearance' of doing anything evil."

And then along comes another and claims non-KJ onlyists do not believe the Bible. It really gets ridiculous.

While they make more assertions, none of which they have any way of knowing the truth of.

My statement has nothing whatsoever to do with the idea of me being the Holy Spirit.

You misunderstood.

What I am saying is that [the] "angry" reactions result from being "poked" by the cattle prod. Otherwise, what-you-are-experiencing is the Holy Spirit trying to get your attention.

The whole point of that statement is - the Holy Spirit is trying to get your attention - He is speaking to you - but you are not listening.

Should have said, he actually acted as if I believed the Bible was originally written in Elizabethan English...

The evidence is in the book.

Who are you asking - the OP?

Because, in human history, there was a 'great expansion' of the Greek language and a 'great expansion' of the English language - each occuring 'worldwide' and at its own "right time" in history. God knew in advance and utilized it for maximum spread of the gospel. It was the "ideal path" (through history) for the gentile world to hear the gospel.

Jews ---> Hebrew
Gentiles ---> Greek; English; [other languages also]

See the pattern?

There is a reason for how all of this transpired. God knew what He was doing.

Well, you know how it is. Now I have to start researching this movement a bit. Looks like you are familiar with this KJV only stuff!

An article I found:

It is perhaps ironic that the KJV 1611 translators themselves, if they were alive today, would not survive for long in the "KJV-Only" camp. They spoke out about the folly of relying on only one reading of the biblical text to the exclusion of other possible renderings. In fact, they criticized Pope Sixtus V (1585-1590) because he didn't allow variant readings in the margins of his version of the Latin Vulgate. They wrote, "They that are wise had rather have their judgments at liberty in differences of readings, than to be captivated to one, when it might be the other."

The KJV 1611 translators also encouraged the use of a "variety of translations" in order to ascertain the meaning of Scripture. Here's what they said: "Therefore as S. Augustine saith, that variety of Translations is profitable for the finding out of the sense of the Scriptures: so diversity of signification and sense in the margin, where the text is not so clear, must needs do good, yea, is necessary, as we are persuaded." It is clear that the KJV-Only advocates make claims about the KJV that even the translators themselves did not make.
~~~~~~~~