Works Complete Faith?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,230
2,208
113
Works do not constitute faith, or there wouldn't be works that burn like chaff.
But the faith that constitutes works will remain when tried in fire.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
17,174
3,699
113
Yes. That is the moment that he that believeth on him exercises (works even?) his faith, and this, subsequently, will 'show' in his works (behavior).

This is why I'd rather say that faith completes (accomplishes) works, rather than works completes (finishes) faith.
For a NT believer, the moment a man believes the gospel, he has become justified and righteous because he has been placed in Christ. No works to earn it, and no works to justify his salvation. Should one go on to good works? Absolutely. Rewards are at stake. A believer could have all his works burned at the JSOC, but he himself is saved.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,230
2,208
113
For a NT believer, the moment a man believes the gospel, he has become justified and righteous because he has been placed in Christ. No works to earn it, and no works to justify his salvation. Should one go on to good works? Absolutely. Rewards are at stake. A believer could have all his works burned at the JSOC, but he himself is saved.
I won't get into the debate about rewards by degree at this moment, not having much time to consider it. It just seems to me that the reward He speaks of in the context of His coming are those of "just" rewards, which can very well be those of an undesirable application with regard to the unbelieving.
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
Where it is written, "Some will say you have faith and I have works. Show me your faith without your works and I will show you my faith by my works." This seems to be answering in a way that is saying, "It is possible that you have works without faith, since you cannot 'show me your faith,' but it's impossible to 'show' my faith without works, since, again, it's not possible to 'show' faith, except by works....

Let establish the exact claim of the OP, here. Is the argument that one "must have works to show faith, and so then the lack of works shows a lack of faith" with the understanding that faith cannot be 'shown' at all apart from works, and that, even if it is invisibly present, it cannot save unless there is work to show it.

If indeed this is the argument, what then do we do with the reality that there are actually works without faith present.
I'm sure it is unanimously agreed upon that works without faith is insufficient to save, as works do not produce faith since faith must come by hearing and hearing by the word of God. That is faith is not inherent to works.

Now then, if faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God then faith does, as is inherent to faith, produce works.

So, the question posed that, "if a person says I have faith but has not works, can that faith save him?" seems to be a rhetorical question calling the claimant a liar, since faith, hearing the word, produces the work of a 'new man.'
No, when James says, "Someone will say 'I have faith'" and that man's saying is infinitely inferior to the man who will SHOW YOU his faith, not merely say empty words, "I have faith"--as John says, "Let us love not in word, but in truth and in deed."

James is comparing the persuasive power of a mere statement "I have faith" against the persuasive power of a walk of faith that speaks for itself.
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
Romans 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

Romans 3:26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
Yep, I believe that.

I believe additional doctrines, as well.

I won't reiterate them all, but, basically, our salvation that Jesus accomplishes is compared to the salvation of the Jews from Egypt (yet, after, they sinned, and, so, fell under God's wrath and forfeited the Promise made to them--today corresponding to eternal life located only in Christ).
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
For a NT believer, the moment a man believes the gospel, he has become justified and righteous because he has been placed in Christ. No works to earn it, and no works to justify his salvation. Should one go on to good works? Absolutely. Rewards are at stake. A believer could have all his works burned at the JSOC, but he himself is saved.
The reason I don't agree that only "rewards" are at stake is because of Ro 2:6-16, and many other such passages.
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
This is why I'd rather say that faith completes (accomplishes) works, rather than works completes (finishes) faith.
I'd prefer to just believe Gods Word--"Abraham was justified by works bc works complete faith".
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
Works do not constitute faith, or there wouldn't be works that burn like chaff.
But the faith that constitutes works will remain when tried in fire.
I don't believe works constitute faith.
You're misrepresenting my view.
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
For a NT believer, the moment a man believes the gospel, he has become justified and righteous because he has been placed in Christ. No works to earn it, and no works to justify his salvation.
Yep, we're saved like the Jews were saved from Egypt.

Still, after they were saved, they sinned and fell under wrath and forfeited the Promise.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,390
1,006
113
Which "All"? Both Jews and Gentiles. Therefore, the "works" it refers to must be works of Law. I'm not saying anything to the contrary.
Sorry but your reply was incorrect on both counts.

The "all" can not be referring to the Jews because the Jews did not exist at the time of Abraham.

Legal works also did not exist at the time of Moses, so works in the context would be good works.

The whole point of Paul's narration on Abraham was to illustrate righteous standing by faith.

Romans 4:13
For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
Sorry but your reply was incorrect on both counts.

The "all" can not be referring to the Jews because the Jews did not exist at the time of Abraham.

Legal works also did not exist at the time of Moses, so works in the context would be good works.

The whole point of Paul's narration on Abraham was to illustrate righteous standing by faith.

Romans 4:13
For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.
LOL "descendants" means "those who would descend", so, yes, obviously, it refers to people who did not exist.

Paul's argument was "He was justified by faith without works of the Law so that the justification by grace through faith could be foreshadowed for all his descendants--not just you believing Jews, who sneer at your Gentile believing brothers, but all of his descendants."
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,390
1,006
113
Why are you calling him a loser? Lol I'm so confused about that.
Because Moses did not make it to the earthly promised land, Moses failed.

Moses led Israel but stumbled and disobeyed God in anger.

A very good lesson for us all.
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
Because Moses did not make it to the earthly promised land, Moses failed.

Moses led Israel but stumbled and disobeyed God in anger.

A very good lesson for us all.
Oh, LOL, I thought you were calling the user a loser.
How could you call Moses "loser"?
He was the most humble man on the planet (at the time).
I wouldn't call Moses "loser".
People got in trouble with God for speaking against Moses!
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,390
1,006
113
The Spirit is repaid the righteous.

Righteousness is a gift (Ro 6), making eternal life a gift.

However, "faith in Christ" is only one "tablet" of the Law of Faith; the second "tablet" is "love one another" (1 Jn 3:23), as is argued in Galatians, James, Romans, etc.
We need to separate these two fundamental laws that we were given. Otherwise, we will effectively be opposing God's grace.

The two commandments are below.

1 John 3:23-24
This is His commandment, that we believe in the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, just as He commanded us. The one who keeps His commandments abides in Him, and He in him. We know by this that He abides in us, by the Spirit whom He has given us.

Believing in Jesus initiates our salvation.

Romans 10:9
That if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.

Once you are saved and receive the Holy Spirit, then you can walk in the Spirit. Which confirms your salvation, maintains your salvation. But be very careful, salvation is a gift and so is love, both freely given to us as gifts.

Now say, thank you Jesus.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,390
1,006
113
Oh, LOL, I thought you were calling the user a loser.
How could you call Moses "loser"?
He was the most humble man on the planet (at the time).
I wouldn't call Moses "loser".
People got in trouble with God for speaking against Moses!
Moses failed!
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
Because Moses did not make it to the earthly promised land, Moses failed.

Moses led Israel but stumbled and disobeyed God in anger.

A very good lesson for us all.
I wouldn't call Moses "loser".
People got in trouble with God for speaking against Moses!
Numbers 12
5 And the Lord came down in the pillar of the cloud, and stood in the door of the tabernacle, and called Aaron and Miriam: and they both came forth.
6 And he said, Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the Lord will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream.
7 My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine house.
8 With him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark speeches; and the similitude of the Lord shall he behold: wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?
9 And the anger of the Lord was kindled against them; and he departed.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,390
1,006
113
I'd prefer to just believe Gods Word--"Abraham was justified by works bc works complete faith".
There is a serious flaw in your argument.

Abraham did not complete the work of sacrificing his son, Isaac. God intervened and supplied the necessary lamb for the sacrifice.

Abraham believed God and was reckoned righteous, the same way, that we believe in Jesus and are righteous.
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
There is a serious flaw in your argument.

Abraham did not complete the work of sacrificing his son, Isaac. God intervened and supplied the necessary lamb for the sacrifice.

Abraham believed God and was reckoned righteous, the same way, that we believe in Jesus and are righteous.
It may not make logical sense, but it actually makes perfect Scriptural sense:

1 Corinthians 15
2and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.

Hebrews 3
14For we have become partakers of Christ, if we hold fast the beginning of our assurance firm until the end...
Hebrews 10
36For you have need of endurance, so that when you have done the will of God, you may receive what was promised.

So, there is indeed a substantive justification, partaking, and, yet, for those who do not endure, it goes away, and it is as though they had never had it at all--they are blotted out of the Book of Life, God forgets their (faith which was counted as) righteousness (as He warns in Ezekiel).

Logic can be the enemy of Scripture--Scripture provides us with the precedents, then logic can come in.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,923
2,118
113
It may not make logical sense, but it actually makes perfect Scriptural sense:

1 Corinthians 15
2and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.
The phrase "unless you believed in vain" is explained further down in the text...

... vv.13-14 and 17 -

--"And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain."

--"And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins."


Paul's argument, to those not believing in a resurrection, is that, "if Christ be not risen / raised, your faith is vain.... you are yet in your sins"... so believing "in vain" is to leave off the vital fact concerning His resurrection (vv.1-4 , 5-8<--but He ACTUALLY DID!!<--this is the crux of the argument).

It does not mean, somehow failing to measure up to some list of "works-for-salvation" I must do in order to make it.
That's not the CONTEXT, at all.
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
The phrase "unless you believed in vain" is explained further down in the text...

... vv.13-14 and 17 -

--"And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain."

--"And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins."


Paul's argument, to those not believing in a resurrection, is that, "if Christ be not risen / raised, your faith is vain.... you are yet in your sins"... so believing "in vain" is to leave off the vital fact concerning His resurrection (vv.1-4 ).

It does not mean, somehow failing to measure up to some list of "works-for-salvation" I must do in order to make it.
1. You want to compare "in vain" to some words that come later, but I'm comparing it to the words immediately in context: "you are being saved if you continue in faith".

2. The issue was about how there could have been a substantive justification upon hearing with faith, but also a justification later on.
I provided precedents.
There is no issue.

3. Since you're objecting, though, why is the believer "condemned" for sinning in Romans 14:23? Why does Paul say he could be a "castaway", despite having been saved, just as the Jews fell under God's wrath and didn't inherit the promise, because they sinned after being saved (1 Co 9:26-1 Co 10)? Why does James say "justified by works"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.