Yes. That is the moment that he that believeth on him exercises (works even?) his faith, and this, subsequently, will 'show' in his works (behavior).
This is why I'd rather say that faith completes (accomplishes) works, rather than works completes (finishes) faith.
For a NT believer, the moment a man believes the gospel, he has become justified and righteous because he has been placed in Christ. No works to earn it, and no works to justify his salvation. Should one go on to good works? Absolutely. Rewards are at stake. A believer could have all his works burned at the JSOC, but he himself is saved.
No, when James says, "Someone will say 'I have faith'" and that man's saying is infinitely inferior to the man who will SHOW YOU his faith, not merely say empty words, "I have faith"--as John says, "Let us love not in word, but in truth and in deed."Where it is written, "Some will say you have faith and I have works. Show me your faith without your works and I will show you my faith by my works." This seems to be answering in a way that is saying, "It is possible that you have works without faith, since you cannot 'show me your faith,' but it's impossible to 'show' my faith without works, since, again, it's not possible to 'show' faith, except by works....
Let establish the exact claim of the OP, here. Is the argument that one "must have works to show faith, and so then the lack of works shows a lack of faith" with the understanding that faith cannot be 'shown' at all apart from works, and that, even if it is invisibly present, it cannot save unless there is work to show it.
If indeed this is the argument, what then do we do with the reality that there are actually works without faith present.
I'm sure it is unanimously agreed upon that works without faith is insufficient to save, as works do not produce faith since faith must come by hearing and hearing by the word of God. That is faith is not inherent to works.
Now then, if faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God then faith does, as is inherent to faith, produce works.
So, the question posed that, "if a person says I have faith but has not works, can that faith save him?" seems to be a rhetorical question calling the claimant a liar, since faith, hearing the word, produces the work of a 'new man.'
Yep, I believe that.Romans 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Romans 3:26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
The reason I don't agree that only "rewards" are at stake is because of Ro 2:6-16, and many other such passages.For a NT believer, the moment a man believes the gospel, he has become justified and righteous because he has been placed in Christ. No works to earn it, and no works to justify his salvation. Should one go on to good works? Absolutely. Rewards are at stake. A believer could have all his works burned at the JSOC, but he himself is saved.
I'd prefer to just believe Gods Word--"Abraham was justified by works bc works complete faith".This is why I'd rather say that faith completes (accomplishes) works, rather than works completes (finishes) faith.
I don't believe works constitute faith.Works do not constitute faith, or there wouldn't be works that burn like chaff.
But the faith that constitutes works will remain when tried in fire.
Yep, we're saved like the Jews were saved from Egypt.For a NT believer, the moment a man believes the gospel, he has become justified and righteous because he has been placed in Christ. No works to earn it, and no works to justify his salvation.
Sorry but your reply was incorrect on both counts.Which "All"? Both Jews and Gentiles. Therefore, the "works" it refers to must be works of Law. I'm not saying anything to the contrary.
LOL "descendants" means "those who would descend", so, yes, obviously, it refers to people who did not exist.Sorry but your reply was incorrect on both counts.
The "all" can not be referring to the Jews because the Jews did not exist at the time of Abraham.
Legal works also did not exist at the time of Moses, so works in the context would be good works.
The whole point of Paul's narration on Abraham was to illustrate righteous standing by faith.
Romans 4:13
For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.
Because Moses did not make it to the earthly promised land, Moses failed.Why are you calling him a loser? Lol I'm so confused about that.
Oh, LOL, I thought you were calling the user a loser.Because Moses did not make it to the earthly promised land, Moses failed.
Moses led Israel but stumbled and disobeyed God in anger.
A very good lesson for us all.
We need to separate these two fundamental laws that we were given. Otherwise, we will effectively be opposing God's grace.The Spirit is repaid the righteous.
Righteousness is a gift (Ro 6), making eternal life a gift.
However, "faith in Christ" is only one "tablet" of the Law of Faith; the second "tablet" is "love one another" (1 Jn 3:23), as is argued in Galatians, James, Romans, etc.
Moses failed!Oh, LOL, I thought you were calling the user a loser.
How could you call Moses "loser"?
He was the most humble man on the planet (at the time).
I wouldn't call Moses "loser".
People got in trouble with God for speaking against Moses!
Because Moses did not make it to the earthly promised land, Moses failed.
Moses led Israel but stumbled and disobeyed God in anger.
A very good lesson for us all.
I wouldn't call Moses "loser".
People got in trouble with God for speaking against Moses!
There is a serious flaw in your argument.I'd prefer to just believe Gods Word--"Abraham was justified by works bc works complete faith".
It may not make logical sense, but it actually makes perfect Scriptural sense:There is a serious flaw in your argument.
Abraham did not complete the work of sacrificing his son, Isaac. God intervened and supplied the necessary lamb for the sacrifice.
Abraham believed God and was reckoned righteous, the same way, that we believe in Jesus and are righteous.
It may not make logical sense, but it actually makes perfect Scriptural sense:
1 Corinthians 15
2and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.
1. You want to compare "in vain" to some words that come later, but I'm comparing it to the words immediately in context: "you are being saved if you continue in faith".The phrase "unless you believed in vain" is explained further down in the text...
... vv.13-14 and 17 -
--"And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain."
--"And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins."
Paul's argument, to those not believing in a resurrection, is that, "if Christ be not risen / raised, your faith is vain.... you are yet in your sins"... so believing "in vain" is to leave off the vital fact concerning His resurrection (vv.1-4 ).
It does not mean, somehow failing to measure up to some list of "works-for-salvation" I must do in order to make it.