God's 7000 Year Plan for Mankind - And a Timeline!

You've got it wrong. The covenant was made when Abraham was 75 years old, and 430 is the time period between that covenant and the law which Moses received on Mount Sinai. Nowhere does it say that it starts to count from Abraham's death. Besides, how could it be more than 100 years apart from the other count, that he begot Isaac at 100 and his descendants in foreign land - Egypt and Canaan - for 400 years?

Yes the Othodox jews would agree with you saying the covenant was made when Abraham was 75 years old. Now the real funny part is they use the same Masorectic texts we do in our english versions but they certainly don't believe they were in Egypt for 430 years. They say 215 years in Cannan and 215 years in Egypt. Dont really understand what they are trying to hide

So far this is the most convincing theory about the time of the second coming, it's solidly based on the Scripture and perfectly consistent with God's six-one operation pattern.

I read this far, then stopped. I seem to remember Jesus said:

NO MAN KNOWS THE DAY! pretty sure that includes the time, date, or general targeted belief........

NO MAN KNOWS THE DAY!

yeah, I'm going with Jesus onn thissin'

Yeah, the 7th day is the millennial sabbath. And that one missing year doesn't matter. You see, by the definition of Jubilee cycle in Lev. 25, one cycle is always counted from Tishri to Tishri on civil calendar, which is in fall season. It's also a common belief that Jesus will return in a Tishri to fulfill the three fall feasts. But if the first Year of Man is counted from Nissan, the first month, than there's half a year between Nissan and Tishri, and that's the one "missing" year.

Which is another reason why the saints reign with Christ Jesus in Heaven in the 7th mill.

We don't know if it's already been over 6000 years or not, because as I pointed out, the calendar system is different, besides the final 2000 years start to count from the resurrection, not the nativity, so the final millennium starts from at least 2030. This timeline is just a rough estimate, the Day of the Lord could be anywhere between 2028-2042.

We should understand the feast days in Christ now. Remembering him for all he has done (blow the horn), being forgiven by him, being aflicted ourselves (atonement) and living in temporary shelters (tabernacles) as we gather in the harvest. They're all current realities in Christ.

This is all speculation. Bible chronology is embedded in the Bible and we do not need to look at any calendar system. You should study Martin Anstey's The Chronology of the Old Testament. He has even adjusted for Ptolemy's error.

Well, the best dividing line is the word of God itself. If it is not found clearly in the word by at least two or three witnesses, then better to shelve it.

In summary, 7 days in the creation week foreshadow 7000 years of human history, 4000 years from Adam to Christ, 2000 years from Christ's ministry to the second coming, and 1000 years of millennial kingdom.

Yeah, the 7th day is the millennial sabbath.

Pretty much agree with these parts ^ (as I mentioned in a previous post the other day).

All old testament saints knew what Martha also knew well, that they would be "resurrected IN the LAST DAY" (John 11:24; see also Job19:25-27... and Dan12:13 where "at the END of the days [the 'days' referred to in THAT CONTEXT]," essentially brings one to [see it is speaking of] the END of the TRIB yrs, aka the START of the EARTHLY MK age, i.e. "THE LAST DAY" or 7th Millennium). That is when all OT saints will be "RESURRECTED" (which is defined as "to stand again [on the earth, bodily--after having died]"... they will be "like the angels" in that they will not marry nor reproduce / bear children [only the "still-living" saints (at the time) who enter the MK age in their mortal bodies will have that capacity... as will their children, grandchildren, etc...])


It seems that Paul was given the task of disclosing something that hadn't yet been disclosed ("Behold, I SHOW *you* A MYSTERY..."), which has to do with the fact that, as far as in the "days of creation" go, Genesis 2:22 says (re: the events of the SIXTH day), "and [He] brought her UNTO THE MAN"... which reminds me of the following quote:



[paragraph excerpt from "The Coming Kingdom: An Outline of the Revelation" by G V Wigram]

"The first Adam in Eden pointed like a finger post to Him that was to come, was a type of Him as the last Adam, and yet He who was the last Adam existed before the first, even in eternity. In the garden of Eden, Adam was created first, and out of a crooked rib taken from his side while he slept Eve was formed.' In its separation from the human body, such a thing would be in itself most unsightly, yet God built it up into Eve as a companion and helpmeet for him. The last Adam will have a bride, the confidante of His love, the church formed by the Holy Spirit a new creation in Christ Jesus."

--GV Wigram, Bible Truth Publishers



Genesis 2 -

21 So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep, and while he slept, He took one of the man’s ribs and closed up the area with flesh. 22 And from the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man, He made a woman and brought her to him. 23 And the man said:

“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for out of man she was taken.”




Luke 24:39 - [Jesus, on His Resurrection Day... later that same evening, after the Jn20:17 thing]

"See My hands and My feet, that I am He. Touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones, as you see Me having."

And so the thread goes on assuming things not clearly taught in the Word - it may be interesting and informative, but it is of a much different nature than the inspired Word of God.

According to pastor Brandon of Roch Harbor church, even in this literal utopia of everlasting peace and prosperity, there are still some bad apples seeking to rebel like those grumpy Israelites in the wilderness, and at the end they will join Satan when Satan is released.

No we shouldn't. Crucifixion on Passover, burial on Unleavened Bread, resurrection on First Fruit, birth of the Church on Pentecost, all took place LITERALLY on these feasts. Why should the rest three be symbolical?

This idea is held by many people, and it is based on the Bible verse which says that God regards a thousand years as one day, and vice versa. If we accept the fact that the age of the earth is slightly over 6,000 years, then we should have already been within the final Millennium. Which would mean perfect peace and righteousness on earth right now. Since we see the exact opposite all around us, we cannot really apply this theory to God's time frame.

Theyre not just symbolic, but very personal to each of us,

And when he had called the people unto him with his disciples also, he said unto them,Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. Mk.8:34

Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 1Cor.5:8

Of His own will He brought us forth by the word of truth, that we might be a kind of firstfruits of His creatures. Jas.1:18

We're being made in his image. It's when, but also how.

And so the thread goes on assuming things not clearly taught in the Word - it may be interesting and informative, but it is of a much different nature than the inspired Word of God.

We should understand the feast days in Christ now. Remembering him for all he has done (blow the horn), being forgiven by him, being aflicted ourselves (atonement) and living in temporary shelters (tabernacles) as we gather in the harvest. They're all current realities in Christ.

Dominion belongs to Gods' people now, but as our King showed, we govern by the attributes of his Spirit.