Aerials1978
To begin, I believed God would save my marriage, and we still divorced. And when I say believed, I mean I fasted several days a week for months on end, begged and petitioned the Father in non-stop prayer. I’m sorry man, I feel you. If I had to do it all over again, I would fast more, pray more, believe more. It might very well end the same way. However, what else are we to do and to whom else are we to go? It was years ago, and I still often feel intense pain.
Onto the subject at hand. I haven’t dived into this debate for many years, if not decades, because I loathe to do so, and I will probably be angry at myself later for engaging. One reason is I can’t believe anyone would conclude that the gifts ceased at the end of the Apostolic age while reading through the text. It’s just not a natural reading. One must hear or read a teaching like that from John MacArthur to even begin considering such a thing.
Nothing I say should be construed as a smear toward John MacArthur. I have enormous respect for him and his scholarship—generally. Although, just to be transparent, I don’t like him. It’s just a personality thing.
Lest anyone consider what I am about to offer as an ad hominin, let me say that John MacArthur is human just like you and I. The late great Dr. Walter Martin spoke highly of John MacArthur, referring to him as a careful Greek scholar not given to error. Yet, he adamantly disagreed with John MacArthur regarding the perpetuity of the spiritual gifts, as does the historical church. Dr. Martin also pointed out the John Macarthur’s father was one of the original cessationism pioneers, which is a relatively recent movement by the way. So, for John MacArthur to give up his theology, he must give up his late father’s theology as well. Anyone that doesn’t think this may play into his positions is being naïve.
Aerials1978, you made a comment in a much earlier post that I could not let go, which is the real reason I took the time to wade into the fray. However, unless I missed it, no one challenged you on it. I don’t really want to search again for your exact quote, so if I get it materially wrong, please feel free to correct me. You said something to the effect of,
‘Paul never said anything regarding when the gifts began or when they would end.’
I hope I have your comment close enough to make my point.
Regarding the first part, why on earth would Paul discuss when the gifts began? The whole middle east knew when they began, as chronicled by Luke in the Second Chapter of Acts. (I miss that band. Yeah, I’m dating myself.) Everyone knew the gifts began on that particular Pentecost.
To the second part, Paul indeed said when the gifts would cease.
“Therefore you do not lack any spiritual gift as you eagerly wait for our Lord Jesus Christ to be revealed.”
I Corinthians 1:7
I would encourage you to look up the word “gift” in the Greek and you will find it is the same as used later on in the same book.
I’m not sure how Paul could have made this anymore clear. Did he need to say something like ‘…for our Lord and Christ to be revealed at the second coming and not the close of the canon.’ Anyone trying to make the case that “revealed” refers to the close of the canon is failing the straight face test. That would be silly.
Now, while I personally believe the canon closed with the Apostolic age, I see nothing that explicitly states that it did. However, I believe we can surmise this based on history, and all the authors of the New Testament were first-hand witnesses of the Ministry of Jesus, or acquaintances of them. Actually, I’m not sure whether Paul witnessed any of Jesus’ ministry, but clearly, Jesus appeared to him.
That Paul’s use of the word “perfect” later on refers to the close of the canon is rather weak. At the beginning of the letter, Paul ties the subject of gifts in with the coming of Jesus. It is unnatural and out of context to claim he then switched his reference to refer to the canon at the end of the letter.
Do I think anyone has to believe as continuationists do as a prerequisite for the Holy Spirit to distribute those gifts? The Holy Spirit is God. He can exercise those gifts through anyone He wants. He knows honest believers have been taught wrong things by other honest believers. I will say this, buying into the wrong teaching might leave an individual timid about speaking out, exercising supernatural faith, etc. The key word here is “gifts.” The Holy Spirit is a gift giver and longs to fulfill them in the Body of Christ. Cleary, there are abuses as described in the same epistle. However, I will not throw a gift worth more than gold out with the bathwater.
I think I’ve said my piece.