A Double Standard in Christianity?

You made the claim; the obligation is on you to support your claim. I'm saying your claim is not supported, which would require me to post the entire New Testament to substantiate.

Translation: "I don't have a verse."

I know how that game goes, and I also know that you know very well the verses that refute your woke opinion.

Actually, it's not a game. You made a claim; it's on you to support that claim.

I am confident that you cannot support your claim as stated.

I know the book says that but it is wrong!

Oh, I'm sure you are. I'm sure you would like to think that at least. I'm sure you very well know the passages in Timothy and Titus that explicitly describe what is required to be a pastor. This means you either deep down you know you are wrong, but would rather embrace woke "christianty", or you are one of those men who would like to believe that speaking in tongues and prophesy are just silly little mistakes in the bible that only elite and very smart men understand, and that they aren't actually real anymore, and thus you say that the words "prophesy" in the new testament actually means preaching. Even though that would make Paul a deceiver. Do you happen to be a Calvinist?

Second class? No. But always with covering because of the angels.

It does, yet people change it every day to make it to say what they want. For example:
1 Timothy 2:9In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; 10But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. 11Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. 12But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 13For Adam was first formed, then Eve. 14And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. 15Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
This is general teaching to the women at Ephesus. Yet V12 is continuously taken out of context to mean ministry while the context speaks only of their personal lifestyle & marriage. V12 speaks only to the marriage relationship, because it agrees with the man being the spiritual head of the household. Women aren't to try to be the spiritual heads, thus it is written.

Who suggested anything about changing Scripture? "Usurp authority" is a translational choice only. Many translators have chosen different terms to translate authentein. Are they "changing Scripture" in your opinion?

They were given to all Christians.

Sometimes, you're simply wrong. Telling you so is a far cry from 'persecution'.

You made the claim; the obligation is on you to support your claim. I'm saying your claim is not supported, which would require me to post the entire New Testament to substantiate.

Yes.

For I am of the kjv-superior position when it comes to the kjv-only controversy.

I have given the biblical support twice now in this thread.

But some people simply do not want to believe what the holy scriptures teach.

And then they want to claim that they are Christians, to whom such verses as John 15:20 and 1 John 4:6 apply.

So then, every single letter, word, phrase, sentence, or passage that is different in the KJV than in Wycliffe is the result of "changing the Scriptures".

When another person makes a claim, any evidence you give is irrelevant to that person's claim until and unless they affirm it.

Yes; because the kjv was translated accurately from the manuscripts and is the exact representation of the originals.

So, if anything is different from the kjv, it is different from the originals also.

Not true.

A person may reject the truth of someone's claim even though it is absolute truth.

Otherwise, according to that argument, the fact that certain people reject Christianity would mean that Christianity is untrue.

Clearly, you did not understand my post.

You need to do a lot more homework.

I assure you, "wokeness" has absolutely nothing to do with my position. I came to believe as I do through examining Scripture carefully.

In your earlier claim, you stated (somewhat indirectly) that women cannot be pastors. Paul's letters to Timothy and Titus give the qualifications for elders, not pastors. They are not the same thing. Bear in mind that today's catch-all role of "pastor" is not spelled out in Scripture. In fact, "pastor" is only used in one place: Ephesians 4. It is placed alongside apostle, prophet, evangelist, and teacher.

Further, Paul commended Phoebe (Romans 16:1) as a deacon, then gave instructions to Timothy about deacons. Given that he commended a female deacon, his instruction to Timothy cannot mean that he forbade females from being deacons. Given that the same 'restriction' is put on elders as deacons, he can't mean that females are forbidden from being elders either.

As for speaking in tongues and prophesying, I believe that both are valid then as today, and that prophesying is not the same as preaching. And no, I'm not a Calvinist either, so you can dispense with your assumptions about me.

God does not contradict Himself. And whatever is in Scripture cannot be wrong. So who is wrong in this matter? The one who tries to go against what is written.